Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Fr. Jose Augustine vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 9471 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9471 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Fr. Jose Augustine vs State Of Kerala on 4 April, 2024

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                      PRESENT
                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
         THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1946
                             WP(C) NO. 13917 OF 2024
PETITIONER:
              FR. JOSE AUGUSTINE, AGED 56 YEARS
              S/O. AUGUSTINE, PROCURATOR,
              MANANTHAVADY ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE
              P.O.MANANTHAVADY, WAYNAD DISTRICT.,
              PIN - 670645

              BY ADVS.
              M.SASINDRAN
              SATHEESHAN ALAKKADAN

RESPONDENTS:
     1      STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
            DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695001

     2        THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
              COLLECTORATE, WAYANAD., PIN - 673020

     3        THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR
              DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RECOVERY,
              KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, VELIYAMBALAM,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695010

     4        THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR(RR)
              REVENUE RECOVERY CENTRAL ZONE,
              KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
              KOZHIKODE., PIN - 673004

     5        THE SUB REGISTRAR
              MANANTHAVADY, WAYANAD DISTRICT.,
              PIN - 670645

OTHER PRESENT:

              SR.GP - DEEPA NARAYANAN

     THIS     WRIT    PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
04.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) No.13917 of 2024                                    2




                                   VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
                   .................................................................
                              W.P (C) No.13917 of 2024
                   .................................................................
                        Dated this the 4th day of April, 2024


                                         JUDGMENT

Petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:

"i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ order to the respondent No.3 to send certificate of sale, covered by Ext.P1, to the 5th respondent Registrar forthwith;

ii) command the 5th respondent Registrar to make necessary entries in the records of the Registrar's office, showing the name of the petitioner as owner of the property covered by Ext.P1;

iii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ order or direction to the 5th respondent to issue non encumbrance Certificate to the petitioner in respect of the property covered by Exhibit P1;

iv) set aside Ext.P7 in so far as it shows encumbrance in the property purchased by the petitioner in public sale under the Revenue Recovery Act.

v) declare that the property purchased by the petitioner covered by Exhibit P1 to Exhibit P6 is free of all encumbrances.

vi) exempt the petitioner from producing the English Translation of Malayalam Exhibits produced along with this writ petition and the petitioner further undertakes that they are ready and willing to produce English Translation of Malayalam documents as and when required;

vii) award cost to the petitioner;

viii) issue any other writ order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case"

2. It is averred that the property having an extent of 60.50 Ares in re-

survey no.260/3B of Arattuthara Desom in Mananthavady Amsom,

Mananthavady Taluk in Wayanad District was put for sale by the 2 nd

respondent as per the provisions of the Revenue Recovery Act. The

petitioner bid in auction the said property and the sale was confirmed on

22.01.1993. Ext.P1 confirmation letter as well as Ext.P2 sale certificate

was issued in favour of the petitioner. Thereafter possession was also

handed over and tax was also received from the petitioner as evident from

Ext.P3. The grievance raised by the petitioner is that the name of the

previous owner is still remaining in the encumbrance certificate and that

the factum of sale in favour of the petitioner is not seen reflected in Ext.P7

and in the records of the Sub Registrar's Office. Petitioner relying on

Section 89(4) of the Registration Act submits that every revenue officer

granting a certificate of the sale to the purchaser of immovable property

sold by public auction shall send a copy of the certificate to the registering

officer within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the whole or any part of

the property comprised in the certificate is situate, and such officer shall

file the copy in his book no.1. On the strength of the said provision

petitioner would contend that it is the duty of the 3 rd respondent to direct

the 5th respondent to make necessary changes in the ownership of the

property after conducting sale and consequently the 5th respondent is also

duty bound to make necessary entries in the records in the Sub

Registrar's Office and issue an encumbrance certificate noting the

necessary changes that has taken place.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

After hearing both sides I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition

with a direction to the 3rd respondent to intimate the factum of sale and

issuance of Ext.P2 sale certificate to the 5 th respondent within a period of

two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The 5 th

respondent on receipt of the same shall make necessary entry regarding

the same in book no.1 and in other relevant records and thereafter fresh

encumbrance certificate shall be issued to the petitioner noting the

changes that has happened pursuant to the sale conducted as evident

from Ext.P2. The encumbrance certificate shall be issued within a period

of two weeks from the date of receipt of intimation from the 3 rd respondent

as directed above.

With the abovesaid directions the writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE

cks

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13917/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF CONFIRMATION OF SALE DATED 22.01.1993,ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF SALE DATED 10.05.1993, ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN RESPECT OF THE ABOVE SAID PROPERTY.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 20.11.1993 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MANANTHAVADY IN RESPECT OF THE PROPERTY IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 30.06.2023, IN FAVOUR OF THE CHURCH IN RESPECT OF ALL THE PROPERTIES.

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 11.07.2023 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MANANTHAVADY.

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE THANDAPER ACCOUNT DATED 30.06.2023 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER IN RESPECT OF THE ABOVE SAID PROPERTY.

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT IN RESPECT OF THE PROPERTY SITUATED IN RS NO.260/3 B, HAVING AN EXTENT OF 60/70 ARES.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter