Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abhishek Saji vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 9212 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9212 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Abhishek Saji vs State Of Kerala on 3 April, 2024

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
    WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1946
                      BAIL APPL. NO. 1860 OF 2024
  CRIME NO.6/2023 OF NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, KOCHI, Ernakulam
AGAINST   THE   ORDER/JUDGMENT   DATED   IN    SC    NO.1939    OF   2023   OF   I
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.6:

            ABHISHEK SAJI,
            AGED 25 YEARS
            S/O. SAJI T.K, THARAKANARUPARAMBIL HOUSE,
            KANCHIYAR (P.O), KANCHIYAR,IDUKKI DISTRICT,
            PIN - 685511
            BY ADV NIREESH MATHEW


RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT:

    1       STATE OF KERALA,
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM,
            KOCHI., PIN - 682031
    2       UNION OF INDIA,
            REP. BY INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU,
            COCHIN, REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, HIGH
            COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN-682031 IS IMPLEADED AS
            ADDL. R2 AS PER ORDER DATED 20/03/2024 IN
            CRL.MA.1/2024.
            BY ADV
            SMT. NIMA JACOB - PP
            SRI. RAJA GOPALAN NAIR, CGC

     THIS   BAIL   APPLICATION    HAVING      COME   UP   FOR    ADMISSION       ON
03.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 BAIL APPL. NO. 1860 OF 2024
                              ..2..



                MOHAMMED NIAS C.P, J.
          ========================
                  B.A. No. 1860 of 2024
          ========================
          Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2024


                         ORDER

This is an application filed under Section 439 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail.

2. The petitioner is the 6th accused in Crime

No.6/2023 of Narcotic Control Bureau, Cochin Zonal Unit.

The offence alleged against the petitioner is under Sections

21, 22(c), 28 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances Act, 1985, (for short, 'NDPS Act')

3. The prosecution case is that, based on the

information received from Ernakulam Head Post Office on

21.6.2023 at around 14.15 hours, that four suspicious

parcels containing suspected narcotic substances were lying

at their office, the team of NCB Cochin reached Ernakulam

Head Post Office. Thereafter, the suspected parcels were

seized in the presence of independent witnesses. From the BAIL APPL. NO. 1860 OF 2024 ..3..

said parcel, 2.23 grams (200 LSD blots) of thick multi-

coloured design paper believed to be LSD were recovered.

Based on the same, the NCB summoned three persons,

including the petitioner herein. When their statements were

recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, all of them

admitted their role in procuring the LSD blots. The petitioner

herein was arrested on 23.6.2023 and since then he has

been in judicial custody.

4. This is the 2nd bail application filed by the

petitioner. The earlier bail application was rejected by an

order dated 22.11.2023 in B.A No. 9066 of 2023. The

learned counsel for the petitioner argues that, at the time of

the rejection of the first bail application, the complaint was

not filed. After filing the complaint, it is submitted that the

only allegation remaining against him was that he had gone

to the post office to enquire about the details of the courier

in question and also the tracking from the details received

on his mobile number. It is submitted that, apart from the

above, there is nothing to connect the petitioner.

5. While dismissing the earlier application, the BAIL APPL. NO. 1860 OF 2024 ..4..

involvement of the petitioner was clearly pointed out apart

from the statement given by the petitioner and other

accused that the said parcel was through an online

application, namely 'Wicker Me' by using the e-mail ID of

the petitioner or his mobile phone. It is also stated that a

payment was made through the cryptocurrency "XMR" pad

worth Rs.8,000/- Indian Rupees through the wicker.

6. Considering the fact that there are materials

showing the involvement of the petitioner and the fact that

the rigour under Section 37 of the NDPS Act is applicable,

the fact that the petitioner is already involved in other

crimes under the N.D.P.S Act itself, I am not inclined to

grant bail to the petitioner. The application filed by the other

accused is also to be dismissed. This Court takes notice of

the earlier order itself.

In such circumstances, I do not find any merit in this

application and accordingly, the same is dismissed.

Sd/-


                                      MOHAMMED NIAS C.P

LU                                            JUDGE
 BAIL APPL. NO. 1860 OF 2024
                                ..5..



                  APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 1860/2024

PETITIONER ANNEXURES :

ANNEXURE 1             TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE OCCURRENCE REPORT

IN O.R NO. 6/2023 OF NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU, COCHIN DATED 21.06.2023 ANNEXURE 2 TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 9066/2023 DATED 22.11.2023

// True Copy // PA To Judge

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter