Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9116 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 34672 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
SHAJI P.,
AGED 43 YEARS, S/O ABDU,
PAADAYIL VEEDU,
AGALI VILLAGE, AGALI,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678581
BY ADVS.K.SUNITHA VINOD
YAYATHI VIJAYAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695001
2 THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF,
THE DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, PUDUPALLI THERUVU,
NURANI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678001
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ,
AGALI POLICE STATION, AGALI, MANNARKKAD,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678581
4 THE THAHASILDAR ( LR ),
ATTAPPADI TRIBAL TALUK, ATTAPPADY,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678581
5 AYISHA BEEVI,
D/O KUNJALI KADAMPADI VEETTIL,
KUNDAMANGALAM P.O, PUTTANIKKADU,
MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678583
6 HASEENA
W/O SIDKEEK,
KOTTANGODAN VEETTIL,
BHEEMANADU P.O KOTTOPPADAM, MANNARKKAD TALUK,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678583
W.P.(C) No.34672 of 2023
-:2:-
7 AYAMUTTI
H/O AYISHA BEEVI KADAMPADI VEETTIL,
KUNDAMANGALAM P.O, PUTTANIKKADU,
MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT,, PIN - 678583
8 BALASUBRAHMANIYAM
S/O ARUCHAMI GOUNDER, ALAMARAM,
PUDUR P.O PUDUR, ATTAPPADI,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678581
9 RASHID M.B
S/O BAPPUTTY , MANKIATH HOUSE, THAZHE OORU,
AGALI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678581
BY ADVS.
MANAS P. HAMEED
K.MOHANAKANNAN
H.PRAVEEN (KOTTARAKARA)(K/736/2011)
R1-R4 SRI.P.M. SHAMEER, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
R8&R9 SRI K MOHANAKANNAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 03.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.34672 of 2023
-:3:-
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2024
The petitioner alleges that respondents 5 to 9 are
trespassing into his property and are threatening and
intimidating him - even with attack on his life, in spite of the
fact that he is enjoying Ext.P7 order of interim injunction, in a
suit filed by him before the learned Munsiff, Mannarkkad. He
explains that, his family comprises of his wife and a two year
old child, and that they are now living in morbid fear of being
attacked and done away with, by the party respondents; and
therefore, that he preferred Ext.P11 complaint before the 3 rd
respondent, seeking protection - evidenced by Ext.P12 receipt,
followed by Ext.P13 complaint before the 2nd respondent -
District Police Chief; but that no action has been taken thereon
by either of the said Authorities to afford necessary protection
to him and his family. He submits that, he has, therefore, been
left without any other option, but to approach this Court to seek
reliefs, as has been sought for.
2. Sri.K.Mohanakannan - learned counsel for
respondents 8 and 9, however, submitted that the above
imputations made by the petitioner and argued by his counsel -
Smt.Sunitha Vinod, are not accurate because, his clients have
also obtained interim injunction against the petitioner namely,
Ext.R8(b) from the same Court, which is also pending. He
explained that his clients purchased the property covered by
Ext.P7, along with another extent from respondents 6 and 7
and that they are now in full possession of the same. He alleged
that, it is to get over this that the petitioners have approached
this Court through this writ petition, trying to take over the
possession of the property under the strength of police
protection orders to be obtained from this Court. He argued
that since the disputes between the parties are civil in nature,
which are already pending before the competent Civil Courts,
the petitioner could not have approached this Court to seek
orders as prayed for.
3. Sri.P.M.Shameer - learned Government Pleader,
affirmed that the disputes between the parties are only civil in
nature and the Police cannot intervene into the same or deal
with it in any manner whatsoever. He however submitted that,
in terms of the interim order granted by this Court on
19.10.2023, the lives of the petitioner have been fully protected
and trespass into their property has been averted and removed.
4. I have evaluated the afore rival submissions, on the
touchstone of the various materials available on record.
5. I must record upfront that I do not propose to enter
into the rival contentions on its merits, except for the sake of
disposal of this writ petition, being fully aware of its
implications, particularly when civil disputes are pending
between the parties.
6. Compendiously, the petitioner is admitted to have
obtained Ext.P7 interim order against respondents 6 and 7 and
that respondents 8 and 9 purchased the said property
subsequently. Interestingly, the purchasers, namely
respondents 8 and 9, then obtained Ext.R8(b) order against the
petitioner from the same Court, in O.S. No.165 of 2023, which
is also pending.
7. Therefore, as matters now stand, both sides have
orders against each other and there is also a confusion before
this Court as to whether they cover the same properties, or
others. In any event, these are not matters which this Court can
look into, since they are already seized by the competent Civil
Court.
8. It is also without doubt that this Court had passed an
interim order on 19.10.2023 and that the Police had
implemented the same, offering protection to the petitioner and
to his property. As long as this situation continues, it cannot be
disturbed, unless the party respondents are able to obtain
necessary orders from the Civil Court, either after vacating
Ext.P7 or modifying the same, as warranted under the statutory
mandate.
9. In the afore circumstances, I have no doubt that the
petitioner is entitled to relief because, whatever be the reason,
the party respondents cannot take law into their own hands or
unleash violence to obtain possession of the property, when
Ext.P7 order is still in force. Their remedy is certainly to
approach the Civil Court and seek relief.
10. That said, I record the submissions of
Sri.K.Mohanakannan, that his clients have not and will not
cause any threat or intimidation to the petitioner and that they
will not act in violation of law, or Ext.P7 order of the Munsiff
Court. He pleaded that his client be given full liberty to move
the said court and obtain necessary orders; and that this Court
make no declarations on the internecine contentions.
11. In the afore circumstances, I allow this writ petition,
confirming the interim order dated 19.10.2023; consequently,
directing the 3rd respondent to ensure that the lives of the
petitioner and his family, as also his property, are adequately
protected; however, adhering to any orders to be issued by the
Civil Court in future.
12. To paraphrase, the protection for the lives of the
petitioner and his family will continue; but if the Civil Court is
to issue any order with respect to the property, then, its
protection will depend upon the same and will be continued
based on its tenor.
It is further reiteratingly clarified that this Court has not
considered the disputes between the parties with respect to the
properties in question - either that which is involved in this
case or others; and that all are left open, to be pursued by the
parties appropriately before the competent Forum/Court.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE anm/bpr
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 34672/2023
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.1205/2021 DTD 24-09-2021 OF AGALI SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE
Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.
NO1725/1973 OF MANNNARKKAD SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE DATED 08-05-1973
Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF PURCHASE CERTIFICATE NO 346/1973 DTD 12-03-1973 FROM AGALI LAND
Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT NO KL09070101472/2023 DATED 04/04/2023
Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE NO. 79936439 DATED 09-08- 2023 ISSUED BY VILLAGE OFFICER IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER TO BE PRODUCED BEFORE AGALI GRAMA PANCHAYATH
Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE ENCUMBRANCE CERTIFICATE NO.2417/21 DATED 29-10-2021 FROM AGALI SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY FROM 01-01- 1990 TO 27-10-2021
Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF INTERIM PROHIBITORY ORDER IN I.A 321/2022 IN O.S NO 76/2022 OF MUNSIFF -MAGISTRATE COURT MANNARKKAD
Exhibit P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 3.3.2023 SENT BY 3RD RESPONDENT TO 4TH RESPONDENT NUMBER TLKATP/250/2023/LR1 SEEKING A REPORT ON THE TITLE OF THE PROPERTY
Exhibit P9 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT DTD 25-06-2023 NUMBER TLKATP/250/2023/LR1
Exhibit P10 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD 22-02-2023 ISSUED BY DISTRICT REGISTRAR NUMBER DRGPKD/2022/2022-E2 AND THE HEARING NOTE SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 01.03.2023
Exhibit P11 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUMBITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 28-05-2022
Exhibit P12 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT EVIDENCING THE COMPLAINT DTD 29-11-2022 TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT
Exhibit P13 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD 14-07-2022 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT
Exhibit P14 A TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE NO 1542/17 DD 27-09-2017 ISSUED BY FROM DISTRICT HOSPITAL PALAKKAD CERTIFYING THE DISABILITY OF THE WIFE OF THE PETITIONER
Exhibit P15 A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO 275/2022 OF AGALI POLICE STATION DATED 14.12.2022
Exhibit P16 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO 164056/2023 DTD 22-02-2023 ISSUED BY DISTRICT REGISTRAR DIRECTING TO APPEAR FOR HEARING IN THE MATTER
Exhibit P17 THE STATEMENT GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER ON 01-03-2023 DURING THE HEARING
Exhibit P18 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT NO 874/2022 DTD 30-06-2022 CERTIFYING THE POSSESSION OF THE PROPERTY BY HASEENA IN PUDUR VILLAGE
Exhibit P19 A TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER IN I.A 321/2022 IN O.S NO 76/2022 OF THE MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT MANNARKKAD, SERVED ON THE PETITIONER
Exhibit P20 A TRUE COPY OF THE A AND B REGISTER OF AGALI VILLAGE WITH RESPECT TO SY NO
Exhibit P21 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER FORWARDED TO THE THAHASILDAR BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT AND THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE THAHASILDAR CONFIRMING THE RIGHT OF THE PETITIONER OVER THE PROPERTY ALONG WITH SKETCH AND NOTES OF HEAD SURVEYOR, IN WHICH THE RESPONDENTS 5 TO 9 ARE TRYING TO TRESPASS OBTAINED UNDER RTI ACT
Exhibit P22 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE NO 82001933 DTD 23-11-2023 ISSUED TO KSEB AGALI OFFICE
Exhibit P23 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE NO 82003727DTD 23-11-2023 ISSUED TO AGALI GRAMA PANCHAYATH
Exhibit P24 A TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF PENDING CASES AGAINST THE 8TH RESPONDENT OBTAINED UNDER RTI ACT
Exhibit P25 A TRUE COPY OF THE CANCELLED POSSESSION CERTIFICATE NO 2073/2023 DTD10-08-2023 EARLIER ISSUED TO THE 8TH RESPONDENT
Exhibit P26 A TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF FACTS DTD 20-11-2023 AND ANNEXURES FORWARDED TO THE ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT OBTAINED UNDER THE RTI ACT
Exhibit P27 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.715/2023 DTD 12-10-2023 SENT BY VILLAGE OFFICER TO THE SECRETARY AGALI GRAMA PANCHAYATH MARKED AND FORWARDED TO THE PETITIONER AND ITS POSTAL COVER
Exhibit P28 A TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF THE POLICE OFFICER FILED ALONG WITH THE MEMO DTD 08-02-2023 FILED BY THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN CON. CASE(C) NO.184/2024
Exhibit P29 A TRUE COPY OF THE I.A NO 321/2022 IN O.S NO 76/2022 BEFORE THE MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT MANNARKKAD
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS
Exhibit R8 (a) TRUE COPY OF THE TITLE DEED OF 8TH RESPONDENT NO.248/1/2023 DATED 16-2-2023 OF SRO, AGALI
Exhibit R8 (b) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN IA NO.887/2023 IN OS 165/2023 DATED 18- 8-2023
Exhibit R8 (c) TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTION PRODUCED AS IA NO.887/2023 IN OS 165 OF 2023 DATE 16/8/23
Exhibit R9 (a) TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED ONE K.HASEENA AS PER REGISTERED DOCUMENT NO.2370/2022 OF SRO, ALANELLUR DATED 7-11-2022.
Exhibit R9 (b) TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION SENT BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER TO THE PETITIONER DATED 5-10-2023
Exhibit R9 (c) TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT WAS ALSO CANCELLED EVIDENT FROM THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER DATED 12-10-2023 GIVEN TO THE SECRETARY AGALI GRAMA PANCHAYAT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!