Sunday, 19, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajesh vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 11607 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 11607 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Rajesh vs State Of Kerala on 23 April, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

     TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL    2024 / 3RD VAISAKHA, 1946

                        WP(C) NO. 13509 OF 2024

PETITIONER/S:

           RAJESH,
           AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.VASU, EEUMAKKATTUKUDY HOUSE,
           MATTOOR P.O- KALADY, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 683574
           BY ADV MEREENA.J.JOSEPH

RESPONDENT/S:

     1     STATE OF KERALA,
           REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
           GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
           PIN - 695001
     2     THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER,
           COMMISSIONERATE OF LAND REVENUE, PUBLIC OFFICE
           BUILDING, MUSEUM JUNCTION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN -
           695001
     3     THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
           CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682030
     4     THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
           OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI,
           PIN - 682001
     5     THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
           MOOKKANNOOR VILLAGE OFFICE, MOOKKANNOOR, PIN - 683577

OTHER PRESENT:

           SRI. AJITH VISWANATHAN- GP

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WPC 13509/2024
                                -2-



                           JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 23rd day of April 2024)

The petitioner, who is the owner of 14 Ares 8 Square Metres

of property in Mookkanoor Village of Aluva Taluk in Ernakulam

District, has filed the writ petition seeking to direct the 4th

respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer to consider Ext.P2

application and to pass orders thereon, within a time frame to be

fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner states that he is the owner in possession

of 14 Ares 8 Square Metres of land comprised in Survey

Nos.83/11-2 and 83/3-2 of Mookkanoor Village of Aluva Taluk in

Ernakulam District. The land is garden land. It is not cultivated

with paddy. It is not fit for paddy cultivation either. However, the

land is described as nilam in Revenue records.

3. The petitioner wants to use the land for other purposes.

Hence, the petitioner filed Ext.P2 application in Form-6 before the

Revenue Divisional Officer, invoking the provisions of Rule 12(1)

of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules,

2008. The application was filed on 17.11.2023. The application

has not been considered so far. Unless the application is

considered expeditiously, the petitioner will be put to untold

hardship and loss, contends the petitioner.

4. The Government Pleader representing the respondents

resisted the writ petition. The Government Pleader controverted

all material allegations made by the petitioner, in the writ petition.

The Government Pleader, however, submitted that since the

petitioner has invoked a statutory remedy under the provisions of

the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008,

the application submitted by the petitioner can be considered by

the competent authority in accordance with law, provided the

application is received, is complete in all respects and is

supported by all necessary documents.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Government Pleader representing the respondents.

6. The property of the petitioner is said to be a dry land,

but it has been described as nilam in Revenue records. Rule

12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland

Rules, 2008 provides for making applications for changing the

nature of land in Revenue records. The petitioner has invoked the

provisions of Rule 12(1) of the Rules, 2008 by filing application in

Form-6. It being a statutory application, the Competent Authority

is bound to consider the application and pass orders thereon

within a reasonable time.

The writ petition is therefore disposed of with a

direction to the 4th respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer to

consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 Form-6 application, if the

same is received supported by all requisite documents and paying

prescribed fee, if any, and to pass orders thereon in accordance

with law, within a period of three months.

Sd/-

N.NAGARESH JUDGE

JS

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13509/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit-P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ALLOWING THE FORM 5 APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE PROPERTY COVERED BY SY.NO83/11-2 AND SURVEY NO.83/3-2 OF MOOKKOONNAR VILLAGEDATED 9/11/2023 Exhibit-P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 6 APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE PROPERTY COVERED BY SY.NO83/11-2 AND SURVEY NO.83/3-2 OF MOOKKOONNARDATED 17/11/2023

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter