Sunday, 19, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jegannadhan vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 11207 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 11207 Ker
Judgement Date : 19 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Jegannadhan vs State Of Kerala on 19 April, 2024

Author: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

Bench: P.V.Kunhikrishnan

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
    FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 30TH CHAITHRA, 1946
                      BAIL APPL. NO. 3380 OF 2024
CRIME NO.394/2024 OF THALAYOLAPARAMBU POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM
  PETITIONER(S):

      1     JEGANNADHAN, AGED 21 YEARS
            S/O PONNAPPAN, MOONARATHOONIYIL VEETTIL,
            KULASEKHARAMANGALAM VILLAGE, EDAVATTOM KARA,
            EDAVATTOM.P.O., THALAYOLAPARAMBU, PIN - 686605
      2     ASHAL, AGED 19 YEARS
            S/O SATHEESHAN, VAIMBANATHVEETTIL,
            KULASEKHARAMANGALAM VILLAGE, EDAVATTOM KARA,
            EDAVATTOM.P.O., THALAYOLAPARAMBU, PIN - 686605
      3     MUHAMMAD ANSARY, AGED 19 YEARS
            S/O DILEEP, VAZHATHARAYIL VEETTIL,
            KULASEKHARAMANGALAM VILLAGE, EDAVATTOM KARA,
            EDAVATTOM.P.O., THALAYOLAPARAMBU, PIN - 686605
            BY ADVS.
            PAUL ABRAHAM VAKKANAL
            VINEETHA SUSAN THOMAS
            ABRAHAM VAKKANAL (SR.)
  RESPONDENT(S):

      1     STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF
            KERALA, REPRESENTING THE S.I. OF POLICE,
            THALAYOLAPARAMBU POLICE STATION, PIN - 682031
      2     ABIN KUNJUMON, AGED 24 YEARS
            S/O KUNJUMON, NADUTHURUTHEL HOUSE, NEAR KARTHYANI
            TEMPLE, KIZHAKKEPURAM KARA, VADAYAR VILLAGE,
            KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686605
            BY ADVS.
            PRASUN.S
            N.A.RETHEESH(K/184/2005)
            SRI.PRASANTH M.P., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
       THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
  19.04.2024,   THE    COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
  FOLLOWING:
 B.A.No.3380 of 2024
                                     2




                   P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
                --------------------------------
                      B.A.No.3380 of 2024
                 -------------------------------
            Dated this the 19th day of April, 2024

                               ORDER

This Bail Application is filed under Section 439 of the

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.)

2. The petitioners are the accused in Crime

No.394/2024 of Thalayolapparambu Police Station. The

above case is registered against the petitioners alleging

offence punishable under Sections 141, 142, 143, 147,

294(b), 341, 323, 363, 365, 368, 212 r/w 149 of IPC.

The petitioners were arrested and produced before the

court on 10.04.2024 and they were remanded to judicial

custody.

3. The prosecution case in brief is as follows:

On 05.04.2024 at about 09.30 p.m, the accused in

furtherance of their common intention followed first

informant and when he reached near to Karthyayani

Temple, Thalayolapparambu, the accused Nos.1 and 2

uttered obscene words towards the first informant and

accused Nos.3 and 4 wrongfully restrained him and beat

him. Thereafter accused Nos.1 to 4 forcefully taken him

in their bike and thereafter kept him at Chunkam and he

was confined there. Hence it is alleged that the accused

committed the afore said offences.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and

the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. When this Bail application came up for

consideration, the counsel appearing for the petitioner

submitted that the entire dispute between the petitioners

and the defacto complainant are settled and an affidavit

of the defacto complainant is also produced as Annexure

A2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the Bail

application and submitted that the offence alleged

includes non compoundable offence.

6. It is a fact that the petitioners are in custody

from 09.04.2024 onwards. Considering the facts and

circumstances of the case, I think the continued detention

of the petitioners is not necessary. The petitioners can be

released on bail after imposing stringent conditions.

7. Moreover, it is a well accepted principle that

the bail is the rule and the jail is the exception. The

Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chidambaram. P v

Directorate of Enforcement (2019 (16) SCALE 870),

after considering all the earlier judgments, observed that,

the basic jurisprudence relating to bail remains the same

inasmuch as the grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the

exception so as to ensure that the accused has the

opportunity of securing fair trial.

8. Considering the dictum laid down in the above

decision and considering the facts and circumstances of

this case, this Bail Application is allowed with the

following directions:

1. Petitioners shall be released on bail on

executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty

Thousand only) each with two solvent sureties

each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the

jurisdictional Court.

2. The petitioners shall appear before the

Investigating Officer for interrogation as and when

required. The petitioners shall co-operate with the

investigation and shall not, directly or indirectly

make any inducement, threat or promise to any

person acquainted with the facts of the case so as

to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the

Court or to any police officer.

3. Petitioners shall not leave India without

permission of the jurisdictional Court.

4. Petitioners shall not commit an offence

similar to the offence of which they are accused, or

suspected, of the commission of which they are

suspected.

5. Petitioners shall appear before the

investigating officer on all Mondays at 10 A.M. till

final report is filed.

6. If any of the above conditions are violated

by the petitioners, the jurisdictional Court can

cancel the bail in accordance to law, even though

the bail is granted by this Court.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE DM

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 3380/2024

PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 11-4-2024 IN CMP 1904 / 2024 BY THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT - I, VAIKOM.

ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT. 15-4-2024.

ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 18- 4-2024 ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL, GOVT. POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, KADUTHURUTHY, SHOWING INTER ALIA THAT THE 1ST APPLICANT IS HAVING ADMISSION NO. 5199 AND IS A FINAL YEAR STUDENT OF THE SAID COLLEGE.

ANNEXURE A4 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DT. 17-4- 2024 ISSUED BY THE CENTRE IN CHARGE, IMAGE CREATIVE EDUCATION, PALARIVATTOM, SHOWING INTER ALIA THAT THE 2ND APPLICANT WAS A REGULAR STUDENT IN THAT INSTITUTION FROM 2021- 2023 AND HIS COURSE WAS COMPLETED IN NOVEMBER 2023.

ANNEXURE A5 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DT. 17-4- 2024 ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL, ORIENTAL SCHOOL OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT, LAKKIDI, WAYANAD, SHOWING INTER ALIA THAT THE 3RD APPLICANT IS STUDYING B.SC. HOSPITALITY & HOTEL ADMINISTRATION IN THE SAID INSTITUTE.

ANNEXURE A6 TRUE COPY OF THE DATE SHEET DT. 19-3- 2024 ISSUED BY THE DIRECTOR (STUDIES) OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR HOTEL MANAGEMENT AND CATERING TECHNOLOGY, SHOWING THE EXAMINATION SCHEDULE FOR

ACADEMIC YEAR 2023-2024 IN RESPECT OF THE COURSE PURSUED BY THE 3RD APPLICANT.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY//

PA TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter