Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 11043 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.M.MANOJ
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1946
MAT.APPEAL NO. 658 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.09.2021 IN
OP NO.498 OF 2015 OF FAMILY COURT, OTTAPPALAM
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
SUJILA
AGED 44 YEARS, D/O. SANKARANARAYANA GUPTHAN,
AMBALATH VEEDU, KULAPPADAM POST,
KUMARAMPUTHUR VAZHI, MANNARKKAD TALUK,
PALAKKAD DIST- 678 593
BY ADV R.SREEHARI
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1 UNNIKKUTTAN
AGED 50 YEARS,S/O. KUNJU GUPTHAN,
POTHIYEDATH VEEDU, VAZHEMBURAM POST,
OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT 678 633
2 KUNJUGUPTHAN
AGED 81 YEARS, S/O. KUTTAGUPTHAN,
RESIDING AT POTHIYEDATH VEEDU, VAZHEMBURAM POST,
OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT 678 633
SRI P JAYARAM, FOR PARTY RESP.
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 12.04.2024, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.661/2021, THE COURT ON
THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
Mat Appeal Nos.658 & 661 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.M.MANOJ
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1946
MAT.APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.09.2021 IN
OP NO.235 OF 2016 OF FAMILY COURT, OTTAPPALAM
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:
SUJILA
AGED 44 YEARS
D/O. SANKARANANRAYANA GUPTHAN, AMBALATHU VEEDU,
KULAPPADAM POST, MANNARKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD
DISTRICT-678 583
BY ADV R.SREEHARI
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
UNNIKUTTAN
AGED 50 YEARS
S/O. KUNHU GUPTHAN, POTHIYODATHU VEEDU, VAZHAMBURAM
POST, KARAKURUSSI AMSOM, MANNARKKAD TALUK,
PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 633
BY ADV RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 12.04.2024, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.658/2021, THE COURT ON
THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
Mat Appeal Nos.658 & 661 of 2021
JUDGMENT
Raja Vijayaraghavan, J.
When these matters are taken up, the learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the
reliefs sought have become infructuous and requests that these petitions
be dismissed as not pressed.
In view of the said submission, these petitions are dismissed as not
pressed.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE
Sd/-
P.M.MANOJ JUDGE IAP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!