Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10927 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 11796 OF 2017
PETITIONER:
SANDEEP G.S
S/O GANGADHARAN NAIR, T.C.23/701(1), PAVITHRAM,CHALAI P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF
ATTORNEY HOLDER AND BROTHER, G.S.SANTHOSH, S/O
GANGADHARAN NAIR, RESIDINGAT PAVITRAM, T.C.23/702,
VALIYASALA, CHALAI P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV SRI.M.SREEKUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
1 VENGANOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VENGANOOR,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695523.
2 SECRETARY
VENGANOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, VENGANOOR,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 523.
3 JAYAKUMARI S
MEMBER, KADAVINMOOLA WARD, VENGANOOR GRAMAPANCHAYATH,
RESIDING AT A.J. BHAVAN, KIZHAKKETHARATHALA, KOLIYOOR,
MUTTACAUD P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 523.
BY ADVS.
SRI. RAJESH KANNAN
SRI.POOVAPPALLY M.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
12.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 11796 OF 2017
2
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
--------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No.11796 of 2017
----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 12th day of April, 2024
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following
prayers:
"(i) to declare that respondents are not entitled to utilise any portion of petitioner's property comprised in Re.Sy.No.202(6) of Venganoor Village without acquiring the same under due process of law and to issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ direction or order commanding respondents to desist from forcibly taking any portion of petitioner's property comprised in Re.Sy.No.202(6) of Venganoor Village in the interest of justice;
and
(ii) such other reliefs that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit;" SIC
2. When this writ petition came up for WP(C) NO. 11796 OF 2017
consideration on 04.04.2017, this Court passed the
following order:
"Admit.
Issue notice by speed post to respondents 1, 2 and 3.
Post after vacation.
There will be an interim direction to the respondent Panchayath not to effect any construction, through the property of the petitioner,
in the meanwhile."
Retaining the above order, this writ petition can
be closed. Therefore, order dated 04.04.2017 is made
absolute. But, I make it clear that the respondent
Panchayath is free to take possession of the property
of the petitioner after following the procedure
established by law. Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN nvj JUDGE WP(C) NO. 11796 OF 2017
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11796/2017
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF SETTLEMENT DEED NO.2272/2014 OF SUB REGISTRY OFFICE, THIRUVALLAM DATED 31.10.2014.
EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF LAND TAX RCEIPT NO.0200599 DATED 8.12.16 ISSUED FROM THE VILLAGE OFFICE, VENGANOOR TO THE PETITIONER.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS : NIL
//TRUE COPY//
PA TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!