Wednesday, 15, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mukesh vs State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 10894 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10894 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Mukesh vs State Of Kerala on 12 April, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                          PRESENT
    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
  FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 23RD CHAITHRA,
                           1946
                CRL.MC NO. 3102 OF 2024
 CRIME NO.62/2016 OF CHADAYAMANAGALAM POLICE STATION,
                          KOLLAM
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN LP NO.5 OF 2021 OF
       SPECIAL COURT- OFFENCES UNDER SC/ST (POA)
                 ACT,1989,KOTTARAKKARA
             ..............................
PETITIONER/ACCUSED-A4 :

         MUKESH, AGED 36 YEARS
         S/O MURALEEDHARAN PILLAI, KARTHIKA,
         CHERIYA VELINALLUR MURI, VELINALLUR VILLAGE,
         KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691 516.
         BY ADVS.
         K.V.ANIL KUMAR
         SWAPNA VIJAYAN
         RADHIKA S.ANIL


RESPONDENT/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT :

   1     STATE OF KERALA
         REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
         HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682 031.
   2     THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
         PUNALUR DY.S.P. OFFICE, PUNALUR,
         KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691 305.
   3     VISHNU, AGED 28 YEARS
         S/O ASHOKAN, ANEESH MANDIRAM,
         CHERIYAVELINNALLOOR MURI,
         ELAMADU VILLAGE,
         KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691 516.


         SRI. M.C. ASHI (PP)
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 12.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC 3102/2024

                                               2




                           BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
                      ......................................................
                              Crl.M.C. No.3102 of 2024
                       ...................................................
                      Dated this the 12th day of April, 2024


                                           ORDER

Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C to

quash all proceedings against him.

2. Petitioner is the fourth accused in L.P.No.5/2021 on the files of the

Special Court for SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Kottarakkara, arising out

of Crime No.62/2016 of Chadayamangalam Police Station, registered

for the offences under Sections 341, 294, 323, 324 and 326 of the

Indian Penal Code, 1860 apart from 3(1)(xii) of the Scheduled

Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The third respondent is the de facto complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, on 09.01.2016 accused had abused

the de facto complainant by calling his caste name, and assaulted

him with an iron rod, and thereby committed the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned Public

Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has

been settled and hence the proceedings against the petitioner ought

to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering the nature

of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by continuing the

proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10 SCC 303],

the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High Court

can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the

victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal

proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others

v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra

Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC

653].

7. I have perused Annexure-D affidavit filed by the third respondent.

The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon verification,

it is understood that the affidavit is genuine, and de facto

complainant stands by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the

matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this

case. There is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing.

The continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in

futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioner in L.P.No.5/2021

on the files of the Special Court for SC/ST (POA) Act Cases,

Kottarakkara, are quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AMV/15/04/2024

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

ANNEXURE-A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.

62 / 2016 OF CHADAYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION DATED 11.01.2016.

ANNEXURE-B CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 62 / 2016 OF CHADAYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION DATED 15.08.2016.

ANNEXURE-C CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 01.02.2020 IN S.C. NO. 71/ 2016 OF SPECIAL COURT FOR SC/ST (POA) ACT CASES, KOTTARAKARA.

ANNEXURE-D AFFIDAVIT OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

TRUE COPY

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter