Wednesday, 15, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Arjun vs The State Of Kerala
2024 Latest Caselaw 10893 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10893 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Arjun vs The State Of Kerala on 12 April, 2024

Author: Bechu Kurian Thomas

Bench: Bechu Kurian Thomas

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
     FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1946
                     CRL.MC NO. 3055 OF 2024
    CRIME NO.104/2017 OF Irinjalakuda Police Station, Thrissur
  C.C.NO.77 OF 2018 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE'S COURT,
                             IRINJALAKUDA
PETITIONER/ ACCUSED NO.2 :

          ARJUN
          AGED 29 YEARS, S/O PRASANNAN,
          CHANASSERY HOUSE, PAINGODU DESOM,
          THEKKUMKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
          PIN - 680 589

          BY ADV ABRAHAM MATHAN



RESPONDENT/ STATE AND DEFACTO COMPLAINANT/ VICTIM :

    1     THE STATE OF KERALA
          REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
          ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031

    2     THAMI MUDHARI
          AGED 33 YEARS
          S/O ASHRAF MOWLAVI, THARUPEEDIKAYIL HOUSE,
          VELLANGALLUR DESOM, VADAKKUMKARA VILLAGE,
          MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
          PIN - 680 661

    3     ASHRAF MOWLAVI,
          AGED 57 YEARS, S/O KUNJUMON,
          THARUPEEDIKAYIL HOUSE, VELLANGALLUR DESOM,
          VADAKKUMKARA VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK,
          THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 661

          SRI. T.R. RENJITH, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

          ADV.ANAND KALYANAKRISHNAN
 CRL.MC NO. 3055 OF 2024
                              2

     THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
12.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 3055 OF 2024
                                      3

                       BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                    ---------------------------------------
                         Crl.M.C.No.3055 of 2024
                    ---------------------------------------
                   Dated this the 12th day of April, 2024

                                   ORDER

Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C to

quash all proceedings against him.

2. Petitioner is the 2nd accused in C.C. No.77 of 2018 on the files of

the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Irinjalakuda, arising out of Crime

No.104 of 2017 of Irinjalakuda Police Station, registered for the offence

under Section 420 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The 2 nd

respondent is the defacto complainant and the 3 rd respondent is the

injured witness.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had on 22.11.2016

cheated the defacto complainant by obtaining his vehicle bearing

Registration No.KL-45-N-6920 and thereafter sold the car to the 5 th

accused, who later dismantled the same and thereby committed the

offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

counsel for the respondents, apart from the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter

has been settled and hence the proceedings against the petitioner ought

to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering the nature of

offences alleged, no purpose would be served by continuing the CRL.MC NO. 3055 OF 2024

proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10

SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High

Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the

victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings. This

view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab

and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra Yadav and Others v.

State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexures 4 and 5 affidavits filed by

respondents 2 and 3. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that

upon verification, it is understood that the affidavits are genuine, and the

defacto complainant and the other deponent stand by the contents

thereof. I am satisfied that the matter has been settled and no public

interest is involved in this case. There is no impediment for granting the

prayer for quashing. The continuance of the proceedings will only be an

exercise in futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioner in C.C. No.77

of 2018 on the files of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Irinjalakuda

are quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE RKM CRL.MC NO. 3055 OF 2024

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES :

Annexure 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE F.I.R IN CRIME NO.

104 OF 2017 OF IRINJALAKUDA POLICE STATION

Annexure 2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO. 104 OF 2017 OF IRINJALAKUDA POLICE STATION DATED 19.12.2017

Annexure 3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 31.01.2023

Annexure 4 AFFIDAVIT SWORN IN BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 21.03.2024

Annexure 5 AFFIDAVIT SWORN IN BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT DATED 21.03.2024

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter