Sunday, 19, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sreejith C.S vs The Regional Transport Officer, ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 10595 Ker

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10595 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2024

Kerala High Court

Sreejith C.S vs The Regional Transport Officer, ... on 11 April, 2024

Author: N.Nagaresh

Bench: N.Nagaresh

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
     THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 22ND CHAITHRA, 1946
                        WP(C) NO. 12388 OF 2024
PETITIONER

             SREEJITH C.S
             AGED 40 YEARS
             S/O SREEDHARAN, CHENGALOOR HOUSE,
             NEAR CHENANKULANGARA TEMPLE, CHERPU,
             CHAVOOR THRISSUR., PIN - 680561

             BY ADV RAJESH CHAKYAT


RESPONDENTS:

     1       THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, THRISSUR
             CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE,
             THRISSUR., PIN - 680003
     2       THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
             TOWN WEST POLICE STATION, THRISSUR,
             PIN - 680003
     3       THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
             CHERPU POLICE STATION,
             THRISSUR, PIN - 680561

             SRI.SREEJITH V.S-GOVERNMENT PLEADER

     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
11.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) No.12388 Of 2024
                               2




                         JUDGMENT

Dated this the 11th day of April, 2024

The writ petition was filed by the petitioner aggrieved by

the situation that the 1st respondent is not inspecting

petitioner's car for renewal of registration and also for not

issuing duplicate Registration Certificate for the reason that

the car is presently under judicial custody. Since the original

Registration Certificate was lost, the petitioner cannot

approach the Court with a claim petition to release the vehicle

bearing registration No.KL-45B- 0100.

2. The petitioner filed Ext.P2 complaint to the 2nd

respondent. The entire proceedings before the 1st respondent

is over and it was insisted by the 1 st respondent that before

renewal of registration, he has to inspect the car. One

Sunilkumar took away the car and he was arrested by the 3rd

respondent in connection with Crime No.1043/2023 of Cherpu WP(C) No.12388 Of 2024

Police station and the car was seized and produced before

the Court and the same is now under the judicial custody and

kept with the 3rd respondent.

3. When the above aspect was informed to the 1 st

respondent, the authority insisted for orders from the Court

and orally informed that without orders from the Court, the 1st

respondent cannot inspect the car. Without the original

Registration Certificate, the petitioner cannot approach the

Court and file a claim petition and get the car released,

contends the petitioner.

4. Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted

that since Crime No.1043/2023 of Cherpu Police Station, is

pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court-1,

Thrissur, inspection can be conducted if the competent

Court gives permission.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

and the learned Government Pleader representing the WP(C) No.12388 Of 2024

respondents.

6. The petitioner can claim custody of the vehicle if

the petitioner produces Registration Certificate. The original

Registration Certificate is missing. Only if the petitioner

produces a duplicate Registration Certificate, the petitioner

can approach the competent Criminal Court for custody of

the vehicle. To obtain duplicate Registration Certificate, the

petitioner has to get a Fitness Certificate in respect of the

vehicle. It is for that limited purpose, the petitioner seeks a

direction to the 1st respondent-Regional Transport Officer to

inspect the vehicle.

7. Taking into consideration the entire facts of the

case, I am of the view that for the said limited purpose the

petitioner need not be driven to the jurisdictional Criminal

Court as the petitioner is already before this Court. If the

Regional Transport Officer makes an inspection of the

vehicle that will not in any manner affect the criminal WP(C) No.12388 Of 2024

proceedings pending.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of

directing the 1st respondent to inspect the vehicle of the

petitioner, which is now with the 3rd respondent, for the

limited purpose of renewal of registration. Such an

inspection shall be conducted within a period of one month.

Sd/-

N.NAGARESH JUDGE hmh WP(C) No.12388 Of 2024

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12388/2024

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF CAR BEARING REGISTRATION NO. KL 45B 0100 Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE FINANCIER DATED 31.05.2023 Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 04.07.2023 Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE DECLARATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 04.07.2023 Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 12.07.2023 Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 01.11.2023 SHOWING REMITTANCE OF TAX

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter