Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10563 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 22ND CHAITHRA, 1946
CON.CASE(C) NO. 917 OF 2024
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 14.12.2023 IN WP(C) NO.23902 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT
OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C):
SMT.LEELA V NAMBIAR @ JAYALAKSHMI,
AGED 87 YEARS
W/O.LATE K V VASUDEVANNAMBIAR,
28/829, 'ASHIANA", NEAR KAV BUS STOP,
MAVOOR ROAD, CHEVAYUR,
CALICUT -673017, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VILLA
#170/171, CELEBRITY NATURES HABITAT,
BIDARAGUPPE,
SARJAPURATTIBELLE ROAD,
BANGALORE, PIN - 562107
BY ADVS.
V.V.NANDAGOPAL NAMBIAR
PREEJA. P.VIJAYAN
SMITHA (EZHUPUNNA)
CHITRA JOHNSON
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 3, 5, 6 & 9 IN WP(C):
1 ARUN K VIJAYAN,
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
CIVIL STATION COLLECTORATE ROAD,
KANNUR, PIN - 670002
2 KALA BHASKER
THE TAHASILDAR, THALIPPARAMBATALUK,
KANNUR DISTRICT., PIN - 670001
3 RAJAN E.K,
TAHASILDAR (LR), PAYYANNUR,
KANNUR DISTRICT- 670 307., PIN - 670307
Con.Case (C) No.917 of 2024
in 2
W.P.(C) No.23902 of 2023
4 RAJESH,
STATION HOUSER OFFICER,
PERINGOME POLICE STATION, PERIGOME,
KANNUR-, PIN - 670307
OTHER PRESENT:
SPL.GP - C.E.UNNIKRISHNAN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 11.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case (C) No.917 of 2024
in 3
W.P.(C) No.23902 of 2023
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
.................................................................
Con.Case (C) No.917 of 2024
in
W.P.(C) No.23902 of 2023
.................................................................
Dated this the 11th day of April, 2024
JUDGMENT
The above contempt of court case is filed complaining that
Annexure-A4 order has been issued in violation of Annexure-A3
interim order. An affidavit has been filed by the 3 rd respondent wherein
it is stated that on getting further details from the Taluk land Board so
as to identify and demarcate the property, a fresh order has to be
passed in Ext.P11 Form 8 application submitted by the petitioner and
therefore Annexure-A4 order will be recalled and Ext.P11 application
will be re-considered afresh after getting all necessary documents to
identify the property. The learned Special Government Pleader would
submit that at least three months time is required to complete the
process.
In view of the fact that the authorities are withdrawing
Annexure-A4 order, I am inclined to close the contempt of court case
recording the undertaking of the 3rd respondent that further orders in
this regard will be issued in accordance with law, within an outer limit
of three months from today. If there is any violation of the abovesaid
undertaking, petitioner will be free to reopen this contempt of court
case.
Sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE
cks
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 917/2024
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1 TRUE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14.12.2023 IN WPC NO.23902/2023
Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE I.A 1 OF 2024 DATED 10.01.2024 IN WPC NO.23902/2023 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT
Annexure A3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED
Annexure A4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.
D3/3304/2023 DATED 06.03.2024 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!