Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9821 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 22ND BHADRA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 29916 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
SANTISON
AGED 54 YEARS
S/O YESUDASAN, PUTHEN PURACKAL, THAVARANA, UPPUTHARA P.O,
IDUKKI DISTRICT., PIN - 685505
BY ADVS.
T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN
K.K.AKHIL
T. SREELAKSHMI UNNIKRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI
COLLECTORATE, IDUKKI, PIN - 685603
2 THE TAHSILDAR
TALUK OFFICE, PEERMADE, IDUKKI., PIN - 685531
3 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
VILLAGE OFFICE, UPPUTHARA, IDUKKI, PIN - 685505
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI. BIMAL K. NATH-SR.GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
13.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 29916 OF 2023
2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner states that he is having absolute
title, possession and ownership over 81 Ares and 75
Sq Meters of land situated in Survey No. 338/13 of
Upputhara Village in Peermade Taluk in Idukki District
covered by Exts. P1 and P2. The land tax in respect of
the said property was accepted only provisionally, as
can be seen from Ext. P1. Since the petitioner
proposed to sell a portion of the property, he applied
for ROR certificate, possession certificate and other
revenue certificates before the 3rd respondent.
However, the 3rd respondent refused to grant the
same, since the Survey number of the property is
included in Rajamanickam Commission Report.
Accordingly, the petitioner has approached this Court
for direction to the 3rd respondent to accept basic tax WP(C) NO. 29916 OF 2023
in respect of the said property and to issue revenue
certificates including location sketch, ROR certificate,
possession certificate and tax receipt without making
any adverse endorsements.
2. The petitioner refers to Ext. P3 judgment of
this Court passed under similar circumstances
directing the revenue authorities to issue revenue
certificates without making adverse endorsements.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned Government Pleader for respondents.
4. The petitioner has obtained title to the
property by virtue of Exts. P1 and P2. In Ext. P3
judgment, this Court has held that proceedings under
the Land Conservancy Act cannot be invoked in cases
where the party concerned has valid title over the
property. It was further held that, in such cases, the WP(C) NO. 29916 OF 2023
State will be free to initiate appropriate civil
proceedings to establish its title and until such orders
are obtained in Civil Court proceedings, no embargo
can be placed on the right of the petitioner to enjoy
the property or in dealing with the same in the
manner they choose.
In the light of Ext. P3 judgment, I direct the 3 rd
respondent to issue revenue certificates including
ROR certificate, location sketch and possession
certificate, without making any adverse
endorsements, on remitting the requisite fees. The
petitioner shall also be permitted to pay tax in
respect of the aforesaid property and the tax receipt
shall not carry any adverse endorsement. It is made
clear that the above order will be subject to the
adjudication of the title in any civil suit, if any, WP(C) NO. 29916 OF 2023
instituted by the Government.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE bnu WP(C) NO. 29916 OF 2023
APPENDIX
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT, DATED 18/6/2022 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NUMBER 3065/2000 DATED 15/11/2000 OF SRO, PEERMADE Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 6/11/2020 IN WP(C) NO.19377/2020 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!