Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9621 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 17TH BHADRA, 1945
CRL.MC NO. 7193 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT ST 528/2019 OF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II, SULTHANBATHERY
PETITIONER/S:
JAIN PALAI
AGED 53 YEARS
S/O. JOSEPH, ELAVUNGAL, HOUSE, CHUNDAKOLLY,
PULPALLY P.O, ,SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD DT., PIN
- 673579
BY ADV A.V.JAMES
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA
REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.,
PIN - 682031
2 K.T. JOSEPH
AGED 59 YEARS
S/O THOMAS, KARUMANKUNNEL HOUSE, MULLANKOLLY
POST, PULPALLY VILLAGE, SULTHAN BATHERY TALUK
WAYANAD DT, PIN - 673579
OTHER PRESENT:
VIPIN NARAYAN PP
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 08.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
-2-
Crl.M.C No. 7193 of 2023
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
======================================================
Crl.M.C No. 7193 of 2023
=============================================================
Dated this the 8th day of September, 2023
ORDER
The above Crl.M.C. is filed challenging Annexure A6 order
passed by the Judicial First Class Magistrate -II, Sulthan Bathery in
CMP No.2077 of 2023 in SC No.528 of 2019. Annexure A6 is an
order passed by the learned Magistrate in a petition filed by the 2 nd
respondent under Section 254(1) Cr.P.C read with Section 45 and 73
of the Evidence Act. Petitioner is the complainant in ST No.528 of
2019 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II Sulthan
Bathery, which is filed against the petitioner alleging offence
punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by
the 2nd respondent. The petitioner was examined as witness before the
lower court and during cross examination, it is stated by him that the
accused had written and signed Ext.P1 cheque. But the accused
submitted that handwriting I n Ext.P1 is not of the accused and
he did not draw a cheque to the 2 nd respondent a s stated by the
2nd respondent. Therefore, the 2nd respondent prayed to sent
Ext.P1 cheque for expert opinion to ascertain whether the signature
Crl.M.C No. 7193 of 2023
seen in Ext.P1 belongs to the accused. The learned Magistrate
allowed the same. Aggrieved by the same, this Crl.M.C is filed.
2. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor.
3. This court perused Annexure A6 order. The trial court
only allowed the petition filed by the 2nd respondent for sending the
handwriting for expert opinion. The admissibility of the same is to be
decided at the time of final hearing. All other contentions raised by
the petitioner in this Crl.M.C are left open. The petitioner can
challenge the expert opinion once the same is received, in accordance
with law. This court is of the opinion that Annexure 6 order passed by
the court below need not be interfered by invoking the powers under
Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The petitioner is given liberty to raise all his
contentions including the admissibility of the expert opinion, at the
time of final hearing.
With the above liberty, this Crl.M.C is dismissed.
sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE das
Crl.M.C No. 7193 of 2023
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 7193/2023
PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT S T NO 528/2019 DATED 18.07.2019 FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE THE JFCM-LL, SULTHAN BATHERY Annexure A2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE DEPOSITION OF THE COMPLAINANT DATED 20.05.23.
Annexure A3 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE EXAMINATION OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT U/S 313 OF CR.P.C.
Annexure A4 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE CMP NO.2077/23 FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 08.06.2023.
Annexure A5 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE COUNTER FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN CMP NO.2077/23 DATED 07.07.23 Annexure A6 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER IN CMP. NO.
2077/2023 DATED 03.08.2023 OF THE JFCM- II, SULTHAN BATHERY
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!