Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10213 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 September, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 30TH BHADRA, 1945
RP NO.947 OF 2023
ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.07.2023 IN WP(C) 20153/2012
OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C):
ELSAMMA JOSEPH CHALAMANA
AGED 53 YEARS, D/O.LATE GEORGE JOSEPH
CHALAMANA HOUSE, KALATHODU, OLLUKKARA P.O.,
THRISSUR, PIN - 680655
BY ADVS.
K.R.PRATHISH
P.K.SREEVALSAKRISHNAN
JOEL CHALAMANA
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WP(C):
1 THE CHIEF SECRETARY
STATE OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
2 THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY LSGD (LOCAL SELF GOVERNMNENT
DEPARTMENT)
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
3 THE CHIEF TOWN PLANNER
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
4 THE SECRETARY
CORPORATION ZONAL OFFICE, OLLUKKARA P.O.,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680655
5 ASSISTANT ENGINEER THRISSUR CORPORATION
ZONAL OFFICE, OLLUKKARA,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680655
6 BUILDING INSPECTOR THRISSUR CORPORATION
ZONAL OFFICE, OLLUKKARA,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680655
BY ADV. SANTHOSH P.PODUVAL, SC
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
R.P.947/2023 in WP(C)20153/2012 2
ANU SIVARAMAN, J.
---------------------------------
R.P.No.947 of 2023 in WP(C)No.20153 of 2012
----------------------------------
Dated this the 21st day of September, 2023
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioner that Annexures A1 and A2 consent letters had been
issued by the neighbouring land owners on 19.01.2005 and
03.08.2023 respectively and that the same may also be
considered by the Corporation while deciding the question of
regularisation of the construction made by the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the Corporation submits that in
case the consent letters are received by the Corporation, they
will also be looked into.
Having considered the contentions advanced and
without expressing any view on the merits of the matter, the
judgment under review is modified to the extent that the
consent letters produced by the petitioner shall also be
considered by the Corporation while considering the question of
numbering of the building.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE csl R.P.947/2023 in WP(C)20153/2012 3
APPENDIX
REVIEW PETITIONER'S DOCUMENTS :
ANNEXURE A1 : TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT RECEIVED FROM THE NEIGHBOUR TO THE PETITIONER DATED 19.01.2005
ANNEXURE A2 : TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT RECEIVED FROM THE SAID NEIGHBOUR DATED 03.08.2023.
ANNEXURE A3 : TRUE COPY OF THE CMS OF THIS WP(C)NO.20153 OF 2012 BEFORE THIS COURT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!