Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Priyanth Pushpakumar vs State Of Kerala
2023 Latest Caselaw 11317 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11317 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 October, 2023

Kerala High Court
Priyanth Pushpakumar vs State Of Kerala on 27 October, 2023
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
      FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 5TH KARTHIKA, 1945
                        CRL.REV.PET NO. 51 OF 2008
  AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CRA 788/2006 OF 6th ADDITIONAL DISTRICT
                             COURT, ERNAKULAM
                 CC 1613/2006 OF JUDL.M.F.C.-I,ERNAKULAM
REVISION PETITIONER:

              JOSEPH JAYANTH, BARDARBOLE KARA,
              THODUVA VILLAGE, PUTHALA DISTRICT, SRI LANKA.

              BY ADV SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI



RESPONDENT:

              STATE OF KERALA
              SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HARBOUR POLICE STATION,, (IN
              CRIME NO. 175/2005), REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
              HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

              SR PP SRI C N PRABHAKARAN




     THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
27.10.2023, ALONG WITH Crl.Rev.Pet.699/2008, 860/2008, THE COURT ON
THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.REV.PET NO. 51 OF 2008
with connected cases

                                        2



              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                   PRESENT
                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
    FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 5TH KARTHIKA, 1945
                       CRL.REV.PET NO. 699 OF 2008
     AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CRA 789/2006 OF 6th ADDITIONAL
                   DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM
               CC 1613/2006 OF JUDL.M.F.C.-I,ERNAKULAM
REVISION PETITIONER:

             PRIYANTH PUSHPAKUMAR, S/O. SUNIL ANTONY FERNANTO,
             AGED 30, VERUBALA VILLAGE,, KALUTHARU DISTRICT,
             SRILANKA.

             BY ADV SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI



RESPONDENT:

             STATE OF KERALA
             SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HARBOUR POLICE STATION,
             (IN CR.NO.175/05), REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC, PROSECUTOR,
             HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

             BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR




      THIS    CRIMINAL       REVISION       PETITION     HAVING   COME   UP   FOR
ADMISSION    ON    27.10.2023,    ALONG       WITH     Crl.Rev.Pet.51/2008    AND
CONNECTED    CASES,    THE    COURT     ON    THE    SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 CRL.REV.PET NO. 51 OF 2008
with connected cases

                                        3



              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                   PRESENT
                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
    FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 5TH KARTHIKA, 1945
                       CRL.REV.PET NO. 860 OF 2008
     AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CRA 790/2006 OF 6th ADDITIONAL
                   DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM
               CC 1613/2006 OF JUDL.M.F.C.-I,ERNAKULAM
REVISION PETITIONER:

             MERIN RODRIGO, S/O. BENEDIC RODRIGO,
             AGED 44, VERUVILA VILLAGE, KALTHOOR DISTRICT,
             SRILANKA.

             BY ADV SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI



RESPONDENT:

             STATE OF KERALA
             SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HARBOUR POLICE STATION, (IN
             CRIME NO.175/2005), REPRESENTED BY, PUBLIC
             PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.


      THIS    CRIMINAL       REVISION       PETITION     HAVING   COME   UP   FOR
ADMISSION    ON    27.10.2023,    ALONG       WITH     Crl.Rev.Pet.51/2008    AND
CONNECTED    CASES,    THE    COURT     ON    THE    SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 CRL.REV.PET NO. 51 OF 2008
with connected cases

                                        4


                                      ORDER

When the matter came up for hearing, the

learned counsel for the revision petitioner,

submitted that, the substantial sentence ordered

had already been undergone and the fine amount has

been fully and completely deposited and hence

nothing remains to be interfered with. But the

deposit was made under protest. Today it is fairly

conceded by the learned counsel for the review

petitioners, the deposit can be applied towards

fine and hence accepted.

Hence all Revision Petitions will stand

dismissed accordingly.

Sd/-

P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE

sms

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter