Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11269 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 October, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
Friday, the 27th day of October 2023 / 5th Karthika, 1945
WP(C) NO. 30443 OF 2017(E)
PETITIONER:
PROF. P.S.SANKARAN NAIR, AGED 73 YEARS, S/O. KESAVA PILLAI (LATE),
SREESHYLAM, OPP. KSRTC BUS STATION, ETTUMANOOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT -
686631
RESPONDENTS:
1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695 004.
2. CHIEF ENGINEER (HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGAMENT), OFFICE OF THE CHIEF
ENGINEER (HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY
BOARD LTD, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695
004.
3. ACCOUNTS OFFICER (PENSION AUTHORISATION), OFFICE OF THE CHIEF
ENGINEER (HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY
BOARD LTD., VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695
004.
4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD., ELECTRICAL
DIVISION, PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN - 686 575.
Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
pleased to direct the respondents to disburse the family pension to the
petitioner by way of an at par cheque, or by cash against proper receipt,
pending disposal of the Writ Petition (Civil).
This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and
the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and upon hearing the arguments of
M/S. LINDONS C.DAVIS & E.U.DHANYA Advocates for the petitioner and of
STANDING COUNSEL for respondents, the court passed the following:
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, J.
-------------------------------------
W.P(C) No.30443 of 2017
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 27th day of October, 2023
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issues
raised in this writ petition is covered by a judgment rendered by this Court in
Malabar Cancer Centre Society, Kannur and Others v. T.M.Dinesh
Kumar and Others [2018 (2) KHC 373]. The learned counsel submits that
the limited request of the petitioner is for channeling the family pension to the
bank account of the petitioner of his choice through a crossed at par cheque
or through a cash against proper receipt.
The learned standing counsel shall get instruction.
Tag this matter along with W.P.(C) No.9236 of 2017.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, JUDGE
SMA
27-10-2023 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!