Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11237 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 October, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 5TH KARTHIKA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 35346 OF 2023
PETITIONERS:
1 PURUSHOTHAMAN, AGED 81 YEARS
S/O LATE KITTU,
PANAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KOMANA MURI,
AMBALAPUZHA VILLAGE,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 688 561.
2 K.K. BABU, AGED 62 YEARS
S/O KOCHUCHERUKKAN,
PRASOONAM, KOMANA MURI,
AMBALAPUZHA VILLAGE,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 688 561.
BY ADVS.
K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN
PINKU MARIAM JOSE
ANIL KUMAR T.P.
RESPONDENTS:
1 SECRETARY, AMBALAPUZHA SOUTH GRAMA PANCHAYATH
AMBALAPPUZHA GRMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE,
AMBALAPUZHA P.O.,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 688 561.
2 AMBALAPUZHA SOUTH GRAMA PANCHAYATH
AMBALAPUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE,
AMBALAPUZHA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 688 561.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
27.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) 35346/2023
2
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
......................................................
W.P.(C).No.35346 of 2023
...................................................
Dated this the 27th day of October, 2023
JUDGMENT
Challenging Ext.P3 and P4 notices issued by the first
respondent, petitioners have preferred this writ petition.
2. Petitioners are senior citizens and are the absolute owners
in possession and enjoyment of 17 cents and 21 ½ cents of
properties comprised in Survey No.73/15A and Re-Survey
No.323/6-2 of Ambalapuzha Village respectively. Petitioners
are alleged to have encroached into a puramboke land.
3. Based upon a complaint from a neighbouring property
owner, the first respondent has issued two notices dated
18.10.2023, produced as Ext.P3 and P4, directing the
petitioners to remove the encroachments and to restore the
Puramboke property back to its original position within 15
days of receipt of the notice.
4. According to the petitioners, before issuing the notices the WP(C) 35346/2023
first respondent has not even provided an opportunity of
hearing to the petitioners. It was contended that they have
valid and substantial grounds to prove that they have not
encroached into any puramboke land and have ample
evidence to prove the same.
5. Having heard Sri.K.S.Hariharaputhran, the learned counsel
for the petitioners, I am of the view that this writ petition
can be disposed of with a direction, since Ext.P3 and Ext.P4
are only notices, which requires an opportunity of hearing
to be granted to the petitioners and a decision to be taken
only thereafter.
6. In view of the above, there will be a direction to the first
respondent to treat Ext.P3 and Ext.P4 as show cause notices
issued to the petitioners and if an objection is filed by them
within 15 days from today, a decision thereon shall be
taken, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 60
days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment,
after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners as
well as the complainant, if any.
WP(C) 35346/2023
7. Till a decision is taken, no coercive action pursuant to
Ext.P3 and Ext.P4 shall be proceeded with.
The writ petition is disposed of.
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AMV/27/10/2023 WP(C) 35346/2023
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 35346/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF BASIC TAX RECEIPT NO.19 DATED 07-12-1987, ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, AMBALAPUZHA TO THE 1ST PETITIONER AND HIS WIFE, VIJAYAMMA EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 21-09-2023 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, AMBALAPUZHA TO THE 2ND PETITIONER AND HIS WIFE, PRASANNA, EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 18-10-2023, ISSUED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER BY THE RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 18-10-2023, ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER BY THE RESPONDENT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!