Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11087 Ker
Judgement Date : 26 October, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. A.J.DESAI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 4TH KARTHIKA, 1945
WA NO. 1780 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 25594/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
APPELLANT/1ST RESPONDENT IN WPC:
APJ ABDUL KALAM TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
CET CAMPUS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, PIN - 695 016
BY ADV ELVIN PETER P.J.
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS & RESPONDENT NO.2:
1 JOEL SUNNY VARGHESE, AGED 23 YEARS
S/O. SUNNY VARGHESE, 8TH SEMESTER,
COMPUTER SCIENCE ENGINEERING 4TH YEAR STUDENT,
UNIVERSITY UNION COUNCILLORS, SREE BUDDHA COLLEGE
OF ENGINEERING, PATTOOR - 690 529, ALAPPUZHA
DISTRICT, RESIDING AT JITESH VILLA,
PULLIKANAKKU.P.O., KAYAMKULAM,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-, PIN - 690 537
2 ASWIN S.S., AGED 21 YEARS,
S/O. SHAJI. L.R., 6TH SEMESTER,
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 3RD YEAR STUDENT,
UNIVERSITY UNION COUNCILLORS, MAR BASELIOS
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 015, RESIDING AT
PARAYANKONAM, CHERUVIKKAL, SREEKARYAM.P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.
W.A.No.1780 of 2023
2
3 STATE OF KERALA
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY
ITS SECRETARY., PIN - 695 001
OTHER PRESENT:
ADV. GOWRI BALAGOPAL FOR THE APPELLANT; SPL.GP TO
ADDL.AG ADV. RAMANAND K.B.
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
26.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.A.No.1780 of 2023
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 26th day of October 2023
A.J. Desai, C.J.
By way of the present appeal filed under section 5 of the
Kerala High Court Act, 1958, the appellant/1st respondent has
challenged the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated
29.08.2022 in W.P.(C)No.25594 of 2022 mainly on the ground that
the learned Single Judge, while disposing of the writ petition, had
made certain observations in paragraph 31 of the impugned
judgment, which may create difficulties for the University in
future.
2. We heard learned Advocate appearing for the appellant
and examined the judgment in question in this appeal.
3. Paragraph 31 of the judgment reads as under:
"31. In summation, I am left with doubt that Statute No.5 of Chapter IV of the "First Statues", as it presently stands, is unconstitutional and contra legis, in as much as it denies valuable rights to the vast majority of students who are studying in the various affiliated Colleges of the W.A.No.1780 of 2023
University; while granting it to a much lower number of students, which does not concede to any intelligible differentia in fostering such a classification."
4. By the above observations, the learned Single Judge has
raised some doubts about Statute No.5 of Chapter IV of the First
Statutes and has not declared it as unconstitutional or illegal.
Hence, we do not find any reason to interfere with the
judgment impugned. The writ appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/-
A.J. Desai Chief Justice
Sd/-
V.G. Arun Judge vpv
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!