Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11028 Ker
Judgement Date : 26 October, 2023
WP(C) NO. 35097 OF 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 4TH KARTHIKA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 35097 OF 2023
PETITIONER/S:
ALICE RAJAN MAMPILLY
AGED 76 YEARS
W/O. RAJAN P MAMPILLY, MAMPILLY HOUSE, NEAR VHSC,
NJARAKKAL, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI ALSO AT : MURIKKUMPADAM,
V.P ROAD, AZHEEKKAL P.O., KOCHI - 682510., PIN - 682505
BY ADVS.
K.T.THOMAS
NIKHIL BERNY
RESPONDENT/S:
1 ELAMKUNNAPUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYAT
ELAMKUNNAPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KOCHI REP. BY ITS
SECRETARY., PIN - 682503
2 THE SECRETARY
ELAMKUNNAPUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYAT, ELAMKUNNAPUZHA,
ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682503
3 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER & DISTRICT OFFICER
DISTRICT OFFICE, REGIONAL DATA PROCESSING CENTRE,
GROUND WATER DEPARTMENT, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI,
PIN - 682030
SRI.P.M.BENZIR (SC)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
26.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 35097 OF 2023
2
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
========================
W.P.(C)No.35097 of 2023
------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 26th day of October 2023
JUDGMENT
Petitioner claims to be the owner of 5.85 Ares of land in
Re.Survey No.124/5 of Block No.10 of Puthuvype Village. Petitioner
was conducting a peeling shed in the fire buildings situated in the said
property. Petitioner now wants to start an ice plant in the said
property, after demolishing the existing buildings, for which purpose,
he obtained a building permit on 23.12.2021. Since water is a major
raw material, it was felt essential to construct a tube well to extract
water for the purpose of the ice plant. Petitioner contends that the
tube well has been constructed, after spending a huge amount,. All
what remained was insertion of plastic tubes into the bored hole. At
the time, the Panchayat intimated the petitioner that the tube well
being constructed without obtaining permission is illegal and issued
Ext.P8 notice has been issued on 21.10.2023 directing the petitioner to
stop the unauthorised construction.
2. Sri.K.T.Thomas, learned Counsel for the petitioner
submitted that immediately on being served with Ext.P8, an
application has been submitted for obtaining permission for
construction of a tube well and the said application pending WP(C) NO. 35097 OF 2023
consideration. It was further submitted that on being informed that
the applications was not properly filed, a physical copy of the
application was submitted on 25.10.2023, which is pending
consideration. In the meantime, petitioner contends that if the
constructed well has to be closed as directed by te Panchayat,
petitioner would be put to irreparable loss. Learned Counsel further
submitted that petitioner will await the decision of the Panchayat
and till then, to avoid collapse of the well already constructed, he
may be permitted to insert the plastic tube.
3. Sri.P.M.Benzir, learned Standing Counsel for the
Panchayat, upon instructions submitted that though an online
application was initially submitted, petitioner has, on 25.10.2023,
submitted a physical copy seeking to construct a tube well, which is
under process. It was further submitted that a tube well cannot be
constructed without permission of the Panchayat as well as the
Ground Water Department and therefore, the construction already
carried out, ought to be closed.
4. Having heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and
the learned Standing Counsel for the Panchayat, I am of the view
that the interests of justice leans in favour of permitting the
petitioner to insert the plastic tube into the already constructed tube
well. Though the conduct of petitioner in constructing the tube well
without permit cannot be appreciated. Such a permission is
necessary in the peculiar circumstances. However, the permission to WP(C) NO. 35097 OF 2023
insert the tubes shall not enure any equity or benefit to the
petitioner when his application for permission to construct the tube
well is being considered. The application submitted by the petitioner
for construction of tube well, if it is in order, shall be considered by
the 2nd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within
30 days from today, uninfluenced by the above permission to insert
the tube.
5. It is clarified that the 2nd respondent will be entitled to
take a decision in accordance with law, and the petitioner shall not
extract any water until and unless, permission is obtained from the
2nd respondent. If in case, permission to construct the tube is
refused, petitioner undertakes to remove the tubes inserted and
close the well, without any objection.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE jm/ WP(C) NO. 35097 OF 2023
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 35097/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 26.04.2023 ISSUED BY PUTHUVYPE VILLAGE OFFICE Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 20.10.2023 ISSUED BY PUTHUVYPE VILLAGE OFFICE Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF LICENCE NO.7/14-15 DATED 22.05.2014 ISSUED BY ELAMKUNNAPUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYAT Exhibit-P4 TRUE COPY OF BUILDING PERMIT NO.A3/12163/18 DATED 23.12.2021 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit-P5 TRUE COPY OF APPROVED PLAN ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit-P6 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT DATED 21.10.2023 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER ONLINE ALONGWITH E-FILE DETAILS Exhibit-P7 TRUE COPY OF THE SITE PLAN OF TUBE WELL Exhibit-P8 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 21.10.2023 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!