Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10718 Ker
Judgement Date : 19 October, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 27TH ASWINA, 1945
WA NO. 1831 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WP(C) 33555/2023 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
SOORAJ C.S
AGED 34 YEARS
S/O SUDHAKARAN, CHECHERI HOUSE, GURUVAYOOR,
GURUVAYOOR PO, THIRSSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680101
BY ADVS.
SAJI VARGHESE KAKKATTUMATTATHIL
AMMU M.
AMALENDU A.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/ADDL. RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE COOPERATIVE ELECTION COMMISSION (SCEC)
3RD FLOOR, CO-OPERATIVE BANK TOWERS, VIKAS BHAVAN,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033
2 THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES
DEPARTMENT OF COOPERATIVE OFFICE,
JAWAHAR COOPERATIVE BHAVAN, DP I JUNCTION,
THYCADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014
3 JOINT REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL)
THRISSUR, OFFICE OF THE JOINT REGISTRAR,
THRISSUR, PIN - 680003
4 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL)
COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES DEPARTMENT, CHAVAKKADU,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680506
5 THE RETURNING OFFICER
MULLASSERYUNIT, CHAVAKKAD, INSPECTOR OF MULLASSERY UNIT
CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680506
6 CHAVAKKAD FARKA COOPERATIVE RURAL BANK LTD
NO: F 1250, CHAVAKKAD PO, THRISSUR,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 680506
7 SAYTH MOHAMMED
S/O KUNJU, KUNNATH HOUSE, BEACH ROAD, CHAVAKKAD PO,
THRISSUR, PIN - 680506
WA NO.1831 OF 2023
2
8 MR.CA.PRATHAPAN ALIAS GOPAPRATHAPAN
S/O APPU, CHOZHEEDAKATHU HOUSE, THIRUVATHRA P.O,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680516
9 MR. P.V. BADARUDEEN
S/O MUHAMMED, PANICKA VEETTIL HOUSE, GURUVAYOOR PO,
THRISSUR ., PIN - 680101
10 MR. PRASHANTH C.P
S/O PRABHU, CHAKKARA HOUSE, IRATTAPUZHA, BLANGADU PO,
THRISSUR, PIN - 680506
11 MR, P.K.ABOBACKER
S/O MOIDU, PUTHANPURYILKALEERAKATHU HOUSE,
THOTTAPPU,MARADU PO,THRISSUR, PIN - 680512
12 MR. M ABDUL SALAM
S/O HUSSAIN MUSALIYAR, MUSALIYAR, MANZIL HOUSE,
POOVATHUR, P.O, THRISSUR, PIN - 680508
13 ADDL.R13 P.K.MOHANAN,
AGED 68 YEARS, S/O KRISHNAN, POOKOTTIL HOUSE,
POOKODE VILLAGE, DESAM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680505
14 ADDL.R14 SANOOP T.S.,
AGED 31 YEARS, S/O SHEKARAN T.K., THAMARATH HOUSE,
MANATHALA VILLAGE, DESAM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680506
15 ADDL.R15 SHAJI.T.A.,
AGED 55 YEARS, S/O APPU, THAZISSERY HOUSE,
POOKODE VILLAGE, THAMARAYUR DESAM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680505
16 ADDL.R16 P.K.RAJESH BABU,
AGED 49 YEARS, S/O BASKARAN NAIR, ANJANAM,
GURUVAYUR VILLAGE, DESAM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680101
17 ADDL.R17 ASHARAF V B.,
AGED 49 YEARS, S/O BAVA, VELIYAMKODE HOUSE,
MANATHALA VILLAGE, DESAM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680506
18 ADDL.R18 R.K.NOUSHAD,
AGED 53 YEARS, S/O ABDUL KADHAR,
RAYAM MARAKKAR VEETIL HOUSE, VIA MADRASSA,
MANATHALA VILLAGE, THEKKENCHERY DESAM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680506
19 ADDL.R19 RAMYA K.,
AGED 37 YEARS, W/O A.VIJAYAKUMAR, AKAMBADI HOUSE,
GURUVAYUR VILLAGE, THIRUVENKIDOM DESAM, CHAVAKKAD
TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680101
WA NO.1831 OF 2023
3
20 ADDL.R20 P.A. NAZAR,
AGED 49 YEARS, S/O ALU., PANDARI HOUSE,
KADAPPURAM VILLAGE, DESAM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680506
21 ADDL.R21 JOUHARATH ASHKAR,
AGED 37 YEARS, W/O ASHKAR, ARAKKAL HOUSE,
PUNNAYURKULAM VILLAGE, CHAMMANOOR DESAM, CHAVAKKAD
TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 679561
22 ADDL.R22 FABINA NOUSHAD,
AGED 35 YEARS, W/O NOUSHAD., PUTHUVEETTIL HOUSE,
MANATHALA VILLAGE, PUNNA DESAM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK,
THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680506
[ADDL.R13 TO R22 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED
16.10.2023 IN I.A-1/2023 IN WP(C) 33555/2023]
SRI.ARJUN
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.10.2023,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WA NO.1831 OF 2023
4
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 19th day of October, 2023
Anu Sivaraman, J.
This writ appeal is preferred against the judgment of the learned
Single Judge refusing to interfere with the rejection of an objection
raised to the nomination filed by respondents 7 to 12 for contesting in
the election to the Managing Committee of the 6 th respondent-Society.
It is the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant that
respondents 7 to 12 are facing surcharge proceedings and are therefore
disqualified for contesting the election in terms of Rule 44(1)(l) of the
Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules (hereinafter referred as 'the
Rules').
2. The learned Single Judge held that an order of surcharge has not
been passed against respondents 7 to 12 and that therefore the objection
raised in terms of Rule 44(1)(l) of the Rules is not sustainable.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant contends that, in view of the
fact that there is a finding to the effect that respondents 7 to 12 have
misappropriated amounts from the Society and since they are facing WA NO.1831 OF 2023
proceedings for surcharge, they should not be permitted to participate
in the election process. It is further contended that the official
respondents are hand in glove with respondents 7 to 12 and that
therefore, proceedings are not being finalized.
4. We notice that Section 68(1) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies
Act (hereinafter referred as 'the Act') provides that in case, in the
course of an audit, inquiry, inspection or the winding up of a society, it
is found that any person entrusted with the organization or management
of society or who is or has been an officer or employee of the society,
has made any payment contrary to the Act and the rules or the bye-
laws, or has caused any loss or damage in the assets of the society by
breach of trust, or willful negligence or mismanagement or has
misappropriated or fraudulently retained any money or other property
belonging to such society or has caused the destruction of the records,
the Registrar may, of his own motion, cause an enquiry into the conduct
of such person. It is provided under Section 68(2) of the Act that, after
the inquiry under sub-section (1), the Registrar is empowered, after
giving the person concerned an opportunity of being heard, to require WA NO.1831 OF 2023
the person concerned to restore the money or the property or to pay
contribution and costs or compensation as the Registrar may consider
just and equitable. It is therefore clear that it is after a notice under
Section 68(2) of the Act is issued to the person concerned and after
considering the objections of such person that an order of surcharge can
be passed against a person under Section 68(2) of the Act. Until such an
order is passed under Section 68(2) of the Act, a person cannot be said
to be surcharged so as to incur the disqualification as provided in Rule
44(1)(l) of the Rules.
In the above view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the
judgment of the learned Single Judge does not suffer from any
illegality so as to require interference in this intra court appeal. The
appeal thus fails and the same is, accordingly, dismissed.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN, JUDGE Sd/-
C. JAYACHANDRAN, JUDGE NP WA NO.1831 OF 2023
APPENDIX OF WA 1831/2023
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES Annexure 1 IMPLEADING PETITION FILED BY RESPONDENTS 13 TO 22 IMPLEADING THEMSELVES AS ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!