Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10588 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 October, 2023
WP(C) NO. 33925 OF 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 24TH ASWINA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 33925 OF 2023
PETITIONER/S:
SREEKANTH K SREEVALSAN
AGED 56 YEARS
S/O SREEVALSAN, DEVISSERY HOUSE, PALLIPPURAM P.O. CHERAI
MURI, PALLIPPURAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
PIN - 683514
BY ADVS.
ANOOP KRISHNA
V.A.PRADEEP KUMAR
JENNY THANKAM
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVT
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI, FORT
KOCHI PO, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682001
3 THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER
KRISHI BHAVAN KAKKNAD, KAKKANAD PO, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.,
PIN - 682030
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER
VILLAGE OFFICE , VAZHKKALA, KAKKANAD PO,, PIN - 682030
SR.GP. SMT.DEEPA N.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
16.10.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 33925 OF 2023
2
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
========================
W.P.(C)No.33925 of 2023
------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 16th day of October 2023
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is the owner of an extent of 0.98 Ares of land in Survey
No.237/24-2 of Vazhakkala Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam
District. Petitioner alleges that he had filed an application in Form 5
under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008
(for short 'the Rules'). Copy of the application submitted by the petitioner
is produced as Ext.P3.
2. According to him, though the application was filed on
15.02.2023 neither has the report been submitted by the Agricultural
Officer nor has any decision been taken by the 2nd respondent.
3. Form 5 application filed by the petitioner is statutory
application as per Rule 4(d) of the Rules. The competent authorities
therefore have a legal duty to consider the said application in accordance
with law within a reasonable time. Therefore, there will be a direction to
the 3rd respondent to submit a report as per the Rules.
4. Having heard Sri.Anoop Krishna, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Smt.Deepa N., learned Senior Government Pleader, I am
of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to
take a decision on Ext.P3 application in a time bound manner.
5. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 3rd respondent to WP(C) NO. 33925 OF 2023
submit a report as contemplated under Rule 4(e) of the Rules, within a
period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Pursuant to receipt of the said report, the 2nd respondent shall take a
decision on Ext.P3 application within four months thereafter. The
timeline specified above shall strictly be complied with by the respective
officers.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE jm/ WP(C) NO. 33925 OF 2023
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 33925/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE TITLE DEED NO 3503 OF 2006 OF SRO TRIKKAKARA DATED 19.10.2006 Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX DATED 23.01.2023 PAID BY THE PETITIONER Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR CONVERSION DATED ON 15.02.2023 Exhibit P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE DATA BANK OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!