Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10563 Ker
Judgement Date : 16 October, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
MONDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 24TH ASWINA, 1945
WA NO.1648 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 19562/2023
-----
APPELLANT:
SREELATHA. P.T., AGED 54 YEARS,
W/O.MURALEEDHARAN K.P, LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL
TEACHER, S.V.U.P. SCHOOL, MUTHATHY, KOROM P.O,
PAYYANUR VIA, KANNUR DIST. PIN : 670307 RESIDING
AT 'NAVANEETHAM', VILLAGE OFFICE TEMPLE ROAD,
PAYYANUR P.O., KANNUR DIST., PIN - 670307.
BY ADV. MURALI PALLATH
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY TO GOVT., GENERAL EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT (ANNEX II)
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001.
2 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION,
DIRECTORATE OF GENERAL EDUCATION, JAGATHY,
THYCAUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
PIN - 695014.
3 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
KANNUR, THANA P.O., KANNUR DIST.,
PIN - 670002.
4 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICE, TALIPARAMBA,
MINI CIVIL STATION, TALIPARAMBA,
KANNUR DIST., PIN - 670141.
5 THE ASST. EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
ASST. EDUCATIONAL OFFICE, PAYYANUR,
W.A.No.1648/2023 2
PAYYANUR P.O, KANNUR DIST., PIN - 670307.
6 THE HEADMASTER, S.V.U.P. SCHOOL, MUTHATHY,
KOROM P.O, PAYYANUR VIA, KANNUR DIST.,
PIN - 670307.
7 THE MANAGER, S.V.U.P. SCHOOL, MUTHATHY,
KOROM P.O., PAYYANUR VIA, KANNUR DIST.,
PIN - 670307.
BY ADV.M.SASINDRAN
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT.VINITHA B.
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16.10.2023,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.A.No.1648/2023 3
J U D G M E N T
A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.
This intra-court appeal is at the instance of
the Aided School teacher. She was not allowed to
rejoin duty in school citing that disciplinary
action is pending against her. The disciplinary
action was actually initiated as she remained absent
without leave. Initially, she availed Leave Without
Allowance. It appears that it has not been extended.
The subject of the disciplinary enquiry proposed
itself is based on unauthorised absentation. The
learned single Judge refused to interfere with the
matter. Pending appeal, the Manager issued a notice
to the appellant proposing an action. The appellant
also responded. If the continuous absence had
resulted in disciplinary action, indirectly the
appellant cannot now rejoin duty through a writ of
mandamus. Anyway, as rightly pointed out by the
learned single Judge, the disciplinary action will
have to be concluded in a proper manner. We direct
the competent respondents to conclude the
disciplinary action within two months. No further
direction is required in this matter. The request to
rejoin duty will be based on the outcome in
disciplinary action.
The writ appeal is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
Sd/-
SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGE ln
APPENDIX OF WA 1648/2023
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A TRUE COPY OF REVISION PETITION DATED 07.09.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE WRIT PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 27.09.2023 ISSUED BY THE 7TH RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF REPLY LETTER DATED 13.10.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE APPELLANT TO THE 7TH RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!