Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5861 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 May, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 3RD JYAISHTA, 1945
WP(CRL.) NO. 214 OF 2023
IN CRIME NO.152/2021 OF TIRURANGADI POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM
PETITIONER:
GEETHA
AGED 48 YEARS
W/O BABURAJ,
KOTTUVALAKKAD HOUSE,
KARIPARAMB, THIRURANGADI,
MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676306
BY ADVS.
NAVANEETH.N.NATH
SANEL CHERIAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031
2 THE STATE POLICE CHIEF
KERALA STATE POLICE HEAD QUARTERS,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695010
3 THE SUB INSPECTOR
THIRURANGADI POLICE STATION,
CHEMMAD, KERALA, PIN - 676306
4 PRAJITHA
W/O ABHILASH,
VENGALATH HOUSE,
PUTHENPEEDIKA, WEST PARAPPANANGADI,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,PIN - 676319
BY ADV
NOUSHAD K.A
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
24.05.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(Crl).No.214 of 2023
3
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
====================
W.P.(Crl).No.214 of 2023
=====================
Dated this 24th day of May, 2023
JUDGMENT
Petitioner seeks for a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider
and take appropriate action on Ext.P2 representation.
2. Petitioner is the defacto complainant in Crime No.152/2021 of
Tirurangadi Police Station, alleging offences punishable under Section
420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
3. According to the complaint, accused had collected an amount
of Rs.11,66,000/- from the defacto complainant, after promising to pay
interest every month and also collected 32 sovereigns of gold and
failed to return the money and the gold, despite repeated requests
and thereby committed the offence alleged against her. The FIR was
registered on 13.03.2021. Later, by Ext.P2, petitioner complained to
the State Police Chief that, she will not get justice due to the unholy
nexus of the accused with the Police. After filing the said
representation, this writ petition has been preferred seeking the relief
as noted earlier.
4. The learned Public Prosecutor, upon instructions, submitted
that the evidence revealed that there is no evidence for the alleged W.P.(Crl).No.214 of 2023
transaction and being a monetary dispute between the parties, a final
report was submitted referring the case as civil in nature and the refer
charge was accepted as R.C.No.1145/2021.
5. In view of filing of the refer report and the acceptance of the
same by the Magistrate's Court, the remedy of the petitioner is not by
preferring a representation in the nature of Ext.P2. The said
representation refers to Crime No.152/2021 and seeks for a direction
to have a proper investigation through another police officer.
6. Since, even before Ext.P2 representation was submitted, the
final report was filed and the same has been accepted by the learned
Magistrate, I am of the view that the relief sought for in this writ
petition cannot be allowed. However, petitioner will be entitled to
work out her remedies in accordance with law against the refer report.
With the above observations, this writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE Jka/24.05.23.
W.P.(Crl).No.214 of 2023
APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 214/2023
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO. 152/2021 BEFORE THE TIRURANGADI POLICE STATION
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ALONG WITH THE RECEIPT DATED 06.02.2023
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!