Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sandhya vs The Secretary
2023 Latest Caselaw 5575 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5575 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2023

Kerala High Court
Sandhya vs The Secretary on 11 May, 2023
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
                                    &
                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
        Thursday, the 11th day of May 2023 / 21st Vaisakha, 1945
                       WP(CRL.) NO. 314 OF 2023(S)
PETITIONER:

      SANDHYA, AGED 44, W/O JOSHI, AANJILIVELLIL HOSE,

      CHEMPU P.O, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 608.

RESPONDENTS:

  1. THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, STATE OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT,
     THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001.
  2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, PRISONS
     HEADQUARTERS, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 012.
  3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, VIYYUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT- 680
     010.
  4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VAIKOM POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM
     DISTRICT, PIN - 686 141.


     Writ petition (criminal) praying inter alia that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(Crl.) the
High Court be pleased to direct the respondent no. 1 to 3 to grant
ordinary leave/parole to the husband of the petitioner by extending the
benefit of Rule 397 of Kerala Prisons and Correctional Services
(Management), Rules, 2014 on regular basis pending disposal of the above
writ petition.


     This petition again coming on for orders upon perusing the
petition and the affidavit filed in support of WP(Crl.), this Court's
Order dated dated 11/04/2023 and upon hearing the arguments of M/S
P.MOHAMED SABAH, LIBIN STANLEY, SAIPOOJA, SADIK ISMAYIL, R.GAYATHRI,
M.MAHIN HAMZA & ALWIN JOSEPH, Advocates for the petitioner and of PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR for the respondents, the court passed the following:

                                                    P.T.O.
       ALEXANDER THOMAS & C. JAYACHANDRAN, JJ.
      =====================================
               W. P. (Crl.) No. 314 of 2023
      =====================================
            Dated this the 11th day of May, 2023

                              ORDER

We had disposed the case and dictated the judgment on

11.4.2023. Before signing the judgment, we found that it is highly

imperative to secure some clarifications from both sides. Hence,

this case has been listed as "to be spoken to" today.

2. We find that, in many cases, applications are filed

under Sec.389 of the Cr.P.C. in pending Criminal Appeals filed by

prisoner convicts, praying for interim suspension and release on

interim bail basis, on grounds like illness/death/marriage etc., of

relatives and even illness of the prisoner convict etc. Sec.73 of the

Kerala Prisons & Correctional Services (Management) Act, 2010

(hereinafter referred for short as 'The Prisons Act') deals with 'Release

on parole' and the grounds cited in Sec.73 are cases of serious

illness or death of any members of the prisoner's family or any of

his nearest relatives or for any sufficient cause. However, the

power vested under Sec.73 can be exercised only by the State

Government. We are also told that the rules framed under the W. P. (Crl.) No. 314/ 2023

..2..

abovesaid Act does not contain any provision relating to the

conditions upon which the State Government may release a

prisoner on parole, in terms of Sec.73. Sec.78 of the Act deals with

'Leave'. Rule 397 of the Kerala Prisons & Correctional Services

(Management) Rules, 2014, framed under the abovesaid Act, deals

with 'ordinary leave' and Rule 400 thereof deals with 'emergency

leave'. The grounds for availing 'emergency leave' in terms of Rule

400 are cases of serious illness, death, etc., of near family relatives

covered by that Rule and also, cases of marriage of near relatives,

etc.

3. Prima facie, we are persuaded to take the view that, if

the grounds for seeking 'interim bail' are grounds covered by

Sec.73 or Sec.78 or the provisions of the abovesaid Rules, like Rule

400, then the plea will have to be taken up before the competent

authority under the Prisons Act and the Rules framed thereunder.

Going by the line of decisions of the Apex Court, it is seriously

open to doubt, as to whether the discretionary power under

Sec.389 of the Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence and release of the W. P. (Crl.) No. 314/ 2023

..3..

prisoner on bail can be availed in cases mentioned hereinabove.

Hence, in the interest of justice, we are of the view that both sides

will have to be heard in detail on these aspects.

4. The 2nd respondent-Director General of Prisons will

immediately furnish instructions to the learned Prosecutor, as to

whether they have a consistent and regular practice of considering

and granting 'emergency leave' in cases of serious illness, death,

marriage, etc., of close relatives covered by the Rules and as to

whether ordinarily, when the prisoner convict may not be eligible

for grant of 'ordinary leave' in terms of Rule 397 such prisoners

could be granted 'emergency leave' for genuine and bonafide

grounds like death, serious illness, marriage, etc., of their close

relatives and also, as to whether such pleas are dealt with

expeditiously, etc. The 2nd respondent-Director General of Prisons

should give written instructions regarding the consistent practice

being following by the Prison's Department on the abovesaid

aspects and also, as to how situations in which the prisoner with

illness is dealt with, as per the rules and norms. The cases of W. P. (Crl.) No. 314/ 2023

..4..

exceptions for eligibility for grant of 'ordinary leave' and

'emergency leave' may also be apprised to this Court, in terms of

the provisions of the Rules. Both sides will also apprise this Court

as to whether there could be contingencies that are not covered by

the Prisons Rules for grant of leave and how such scenarios are

now being tackled.

5. Both sides will also apprise regarding the width and

amplitude of the powers conferred in terms of Sec.389 of the

Cr.P.C. and also, specifically, as to whether the grounds which are

otherwise available in terms of the abovesaid provisions of the

Prison's Act and the Rules framed thereunder can be the basis for

grant of 'interim bail' by resort to Sec.389 of the Cr.P.C.

6. The learned Prosecutor will also make available the

files in relation to the plea of the petitioner for grant of

'parole/leave' and also, the time frame within which the decision

on the pending application can be taken, etc., and may also

produce copy of the report of the 4th respondent-SHO in the

matter.

W. P. (Crl.) No. 314/ 2023

..5..

7. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and

the learned Prosecutor may give their respective written

submissions in the matter.

8. Further, we are apprised that the Kerala Prisons &

Correctional Services (Management) Rules, 2014, framed under

the abovesaid 2010 Act, has been published only in Malayalam

language. There are various provisions in the said Rules which

have to be examined in depth. We are really handicapped in

adjudicating this case in the absence of an authenticated English

version of the abovesaid Rules. Hence, it is ordered, in the interest

of justice, that, the Additional Chief Secretary to Government in

the Home Department and the Law Secretary will ensure that

authenticated English version of the abovesaid Rules are made

available for the perusal of this Court. Steps will also be taken by

the competent authority of the State Government in the Home

Department and the Law Department to ensure that such

authenticated version of the English translation of the abovesaid

Rules are published without any further delay. This direction has W. P. (Crl.) No. 314/ 2023

..6..

been issued keeping in view the legal principles already laid down by

this Court in decisions as in Thanga Dorai v. Chancellor,

Kerala University [1995 (2) KLT 663, para 21], Murali

Purushothaman v. State of Kerala [2002 (1) KLT 698], etc.

The Registrar General will forward a copy of this order to the

Additional Chief Secretary to Government in the Home Department

and the Law Secretary, for necessary information and immediate

compliance.

9. Further, we would request Sri.Asok M.Cherian, learned

Additional Advocate General to appear and assist this Court in this

matter. The Registry will show the name of Sri.Asok M.Cherian,

learned Additional Advocate General in the Cause List.

List the case before this Bench as "to be spoken to" on

24.5.2023.

Hand over to both sides.

Sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE

Sd/-

C. JAYACHANDRAN, JUDGE MMG

11-05-2023 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter