Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3146 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 2ND CHAITHRA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 9783 OF 2023
PETITIONERS:
1 E.S.PRATHYASH, AGED 29 YEARS
S/O.SAKTHIDHARAN, ERANEZHUTH HOUSE,
CONVENT ROAD, KANIMANGALAM DESOM & VILLAGE,
THRISSUR, PIN - 680027
2 ASWINKUMAR K.S, AGED 27 YEARS
S/O.K.P.SHAJI, KALLIDUMBIL HOUSE,
VALKULAMBU DESOM, KIZHAKKENCHERRY 1ST VILLAGE,
KORENCHIRA P.O, ALATHUR TALUK,
PALAKKAD, PIN - 678684
BY ADVS.
REBIN VINCENT GRALAN
DINESH G WARRIER
VIMAL VIJAY
RESPONDENTS:
1 KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY
KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, PATTOM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695004
2 SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695004
SRI.P.C. SASIDHARAN (SC)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 23.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.9783 of 2023
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2023
The petitioners, who are practising Lawyers at Thrissur
and Palakkad Districts in the Criminal Courts, have filed this
writ petition seeking to set aside Ext.P3 to the extent it
prescribes the date "1st January, 2022" as the cut off date for
acquiring not less than three years of active practice in the
Criminal Courts for selection and appointment to the post of
Assistant Public Prosecutor Grade-II (Category No.659/2022)
instead of the date "1st January, 2023".
2. The petitioners further seek to declare that the
fixation of the date 1st January, 2022 as the cut off date for
acquiring not less than three years of active practice in the
Criminal Courts for selection and appointment to the post of
Assistant Public Prosecutor Grade-II is to be corrected as
"1st January, 2023" and Ext.P3 Gazette Notification is liable to
be corrected accordingly. The petitioners have further sought WP(C) No.9783 of 2023
certain incidental reliefs.
3. The petitioners state that they are Lawyers
practising in Criminal Courts since 2019. They applied for
appointment to the post of Assistant Public Prosecutor Grade
II in response to Ext.P3 Notification. Their applications were
rejected as per Exts.P4 and P5, on the ground that the
petitioners did not complete three years practice on the first
day of the year in which the applications were invited.
4. The petitioners state that the date of Gazette
Notification was 31.12.2022. The last date for submission of
application was 01.02.2023. However, by fixing the cut off
date as 1st January, 2022 for acquiring not less than three
years active practice in Criminal Courts, the petitioners are
denied opportunity to participate in the selection.
5. The petitioners state that they have a legitimate
expectation that they will be permitted to compete for
selection to the post of Assistant Public Prosecutor as they
have already completed three years of active practice in WP(C) No.9783 of 2023
Criminal Courts.
6. Counsel for the petitioners pointed out that the
Kerala Public Service Commission usually invites applications
for appointment to the post of Assistant Public Prosecutor in
the middle of the calender year. The selection process is
completed in the same year and appointments will be done in
the same year. In the present case, the Kerala Public Service
Commission has published the Notification only on the last
date of the year i.e., on 31.12.2022. Thereby, persons who
have completed three years of practice as on that date are
prevented from participating.
7. The counsel for the petitioner pointed out that as
the Notification was made on 31.12.2022, the entire process
of selection shifts to the year 2023. All steps pursuant to the
Notification can be taken only in the year 2023. In such
circumstances, it would only just and proper that persons who
hold qualification as on 01.01.2023 are also permitted to
participate in the selection.
WP(C) No.9783 of 2023
8. The counsel for the petitioner further pointed out
that the applications are invited and the last date for
submission of application is fixed as 01.02.2023. As the last
date is of the year 2023, those who would have the
qualification as on the 1st day of January, 2023 should be
permitted to compete in the selection process.
9. It is further urged on behalf of the petitioners that
recruitment to the cadre of Assistant Public Prosecutor comes
with long breaks and the last selection process was five years
ago, in the year 2017. Unless the petitioners are permitted to
participate in the present selection proceedings, it is likely that
in the next recruitment process, the petitioners would be
declared as unfit due to age bar.
10. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the
petitioners pray that the 2nd respondent be directed to include
the name of the petitioners in the shortlist as well as in the
final ranklist to be published for the post of Assistant Public
Prosecutor Grade II.
WP(C) No.9783 of 2023
11. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners
and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
12. Ext.P3 Gazette Notification is under challenge. By
Ext.P3 Gazette Notification dated 31.12.2022, the Kerala
Public Service Commission invited applications online from
qualified candidates for appointment to the cadre of Assistant
Public Prosecutor Grade II, in the Scale of Pay of ₹56,500-
1,18,100/- against all anticipated vacancies. Clause 7 of
Ext.P3 stipulated that the candidate must be a member of the
Bar and must have not less than three years of active practice
in Criminal Courts as on 1st January, 2022. It is the
prescription of the cut off date as 1st January, 2022, which has
adversely affected the petitioners.
13. Rule 7(ii) of the Special Rules for the post of
Director of Prosecution (Administration), Deputy Director of
Prosecution and Senior Assistant Public Prosecutor, Assistant
Public Prosecutor (Senior Grade), Assistant Public Prosecutor
Grade-I, Assistant Public Prosecutor Grade-II, 2018 which is WP(C) No.9783 of 2023
governing appointment to the cadre of Assistant Public
Prosecutor Grade II, it is specifically stipulated that the
persons who applied for the post of Assistant Public
Prosecutor Grade II shall have not less than three years of
active practice in Criminal Courts on the 1 st day of January of
the year in which applications are invited. The said provision
is so clear that it is not susceptible to two meanings. The
Notification was published on 31.12.2022 in the year 2022.
The 1st day of January of the year is 01.01.2022. Therefore,
going by the Statutory Rules, the applicants should
necessarily hold three years of active practice in Criminal
Court as on 01.01.2022.
14. The contention of the counsel for the petitioners is
that since the Gazette Notification is published on 31.12.2022,
the entire selection process spread over through the year
2023. Even the last date for submission of application is fixed
as 01.02.2023. Therefore, necessarily the qualifications need
to be satisfied only as on 01.01.2023. I am afraid such an WP(C) No.9783 of 2023
interpretation is not possible in view of the clarity with which
Rule 7(ii) of the Special Rules has been framed.
15. The counsel for the petitioners relied on the
judgments of the Apex Court in Ashok Kumar Sonkar v.
Union of India [(2007) 4 SCC 54] and Rakesh Kumar
Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi) and others [(2013) 11 SCC
58] in order to urge that the cut off date for acquisition of
qualification should be the last date of submission of
application. The judgments in Ashok Kumar Sonkar (supra)
and Rakesh Kumar Sharma (supra) were delivered in a
different context. In the case of recruitment to the post of
Assistant Public Prosecutor Grade II, the recruitment,
selection and appointment are governed by Statutory Rules.
The Service Rules clearly provide that the qualification as to
active practice in Criminal Court shall be satisfied as on the
1st January of the year in which applications are invited.
This Court has considered the issue earlier in the
judgment in W.P.(C) No.5279 of 2023. This Court found WP(C) No.9783 of 2023
similar argument unsustainable. In view of the facts as stated
above, the writ petition is found without any merit. The writ
petition is therefore dismissed.
Sd/-
N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk WP(C) No.9783 of 2023
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9783/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF PRACTICE DATED 22.11.2019 ISSUED BY THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA IN RESPECT OF THE 1ST PETITIONER Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF PRACTICE DATED 22.11.2019 ISSUED BY THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA IN RESPECT OF THE 2ND PETITIONER Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED 31.12.2022 (CATEGORY NO.659/2022) FOR SELECTION AND APPOINTMENT TO THE POST OF ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR GRADE II IN THE KERALA STATE PROSECUTION SERVICE, ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT PERTAINING TO THE 1ST PETITIONER, REJECTING HIS APPLICATION AS DOWNLOADED FROM THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT PERTAINING TO THE 2ND PETITIONER REJECTING HIS APPLICATION AS DOWNLOADED FROM THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED 30.08.2017 FOR THE POST OF ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR GRADE II ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30.01.2023 IN OA.(EKM) NO.182/2023 & CONN.CASES ISSUED BY THE HON'BLE KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!