Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6286 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 June, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 22ND JYAISHTA, 1945
F.A.O.NO.347 OF 2013
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 07.01.2011 IN E.A.NO.1605 OF 2009 IN
E.P.NO.125 OF 2006 IN O.S.NO.66 OF 2005 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL
SUB COURT, IRINJALAKKUDA
APPELLANT:
JACOB, S/O.VARGHESE, AGED 45 YEARS,
MECHERY HOUSE, MELOOR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
BY ADVS.
SRI.C.A.CHACKO
SMT.C.M.CHARISMA
SMT.MEGHA K.XAVIER
RESPONDENTS:
1 FEDERAL BANK LTD.,
CHALAKKUDY BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER,
CHALAKKUDY, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680307.
2 AVARACHAN,
S/O.VARGHESE, MECHERY HOUSE, MELOOR VILLAGE,
MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK-673306.
3 PAUL,
S/O.VARGHESE, MECHERY HOUSE, MELOOR VILLAGE,
MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK-673306.
4 VARGHESE,
S/O.VARGHESE, MECHERY HOUSE, MELOOR VILLAGE,
MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK-673306.
BY ADVS.
JAYAPRADEEP
MOHAN JACOB GEORGE
THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
12.06.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
F.A.O.No.347 of 2013
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The appellant, who is the 3rd defendant in O.S.No.66 of
2005 filed E.A.No.1605 of 2009 in E.P.No.125 of 2006 on the
file of the Principal Sub Court, Irinjalakkuda, an application
under Order XXI Rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,
to set aside the sale conducted on 12.10.2009. That application
ended in dismissal by the order dated 07.01.2011, which is
under challenge in this appeal filed invoking the provisions
under Order XLIII Rule 1(j) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
2. This appeal is one filed along with C.M. Application
No.990 of 2013 for condonation of delay of 872 days, which
was condoned by the order dated 29.01.2014. In I.A.No.1804
of 2013, this Court granted an interim stay of all further
proceedings in E.P.No.125 of 2006 in O.S.No.66 of 2005, which
was extended for a period of one month by the order dated
28.02.2014. Thereafter, the said order was never extended.
3. Today, when this matter is taken up for
consideration, the learned counsel for the appellant would
submit that the appellant does not want to prosecute this
appeal further.
F.A.O.No.347 of 2013
Based on the aforesaid submission made by the learned
counsel for the appellant, this appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE
Sd/-
P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE
MIN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!