Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 755 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 January, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 22ND POUSHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 40 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
1 THE THAVANOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
AGED 42 YEARS
THAVANOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679573
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADV O.D.SIVADAS
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE,
NEW DELHI, 110 001
REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER
2 THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER,
NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE,
NEW DELHI , PIN - 110001
3 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD 4, TIRUR,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676001
BY ADV. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, STANDING COUNSEL
ADV JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, KERALA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
12.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WPC No.40 of 2023
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 12th day of January, 2023
Petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society
registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies
Act, 1969. Ext.P1 order of assessment was issued
against the petitioner. In the assessment order,
petitioner's claim for deduction under Section 80P
was rejected on the ground that there was no
evidence to show that petitioner satisfied the
ingredients of the Primary Agricultural Credit Society
as contemplated under the Kerala Co-operative
Societies Act.
2. While assailing the assessment order before
the 1st respondent, petitioner has sought to canvas
that the judgment of the Supreme Court in Mavilayi
Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner
of Income Tax; 2021 (1) KLT 485 now governs the
field thereby rendering the assessment itself as
incorrect.
WPC No.40 of 2023
3. Since the petitioner has already preferred an
appeal as Ext.P3 and the same is pending
consideration before the National Faceless Appeal
Centre (1st respondent), I deem it fit that this writ
petition be disposed of directing the 1st respondent to
consider the appeal in a time bound manner.
4. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 1st
respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders
on Ext.P3, as expeditiously as possible within a
period of 2 months from the date of receipt of a copy
of this judgment.
5. Till the disposal of the appeal, no coercive
steps shall be initiated against the petitioner
pursuant to Exts.P1 and P2.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE SKP/12 -01 WPC No.40 of 2023
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 40/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 24/09/2022 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-21 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 24/09/2022 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-21 EXHIBIT3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 22/10/2022 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2020-21 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 19/12/2022 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT WP(C).NO. 22847 2022 DATED 14/07/2022 RENDERED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!