Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 313 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 21ST POUSHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 31333 OF 2017
PETITIONERS:
1 NARAYANAN.C.K, SALES MAN (RETD), KOYILANDY TALUK
AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE MARKETINGSOCIETY LTD. NO.
1786, PERAMBRA, RESIDING AT CHENNIYANKULANGARA,
CHANGAROTH,KADIYANGADU P.O., KOZHIKKODE.
2 NARAYANAN M, SALES MAN (RETD), KOYILANDY TALUK
AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE MARKETINGSOCIETY LTD.
NO. 1786, PERAMBRA, RESIDINGAT AISWARYA, PERAMBRA,
KOZHIKKODE.
3 SREEDHARAN P.M, SALES MAN (RETD), KOYILANDY TALUK
AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE MARKETINGSOCIETY LTD. NO.
1786, PERAMBRA, RESIDIHNG AT NISHIDA, VADAKKAYIL
VEEDU,MENJANNYAM P.O., PERAMBRA, KOZHIKKODE.
4 DAMODARAN T.P, SALES MAN (RETD), KOYILANDY TALUK
AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE MARKETINGSOCIETY LTD. NO.
1786, PERAMBRA, RESIDING AT THACHULLAPARAMBIL HOUSE,
ERAVATTOOR,KUTTOTH P.O., MEPPAYUR VIA, PERAMBRA,
KOZHIKKODE.
5 BALAKRISHNAN A, ACCOUNTANT (RETD), KOYILANDY TALUK
AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE MARKETINGSOCIETY LTD. NO.
1786, PERAMBRA, RESIDINGAT AYADATHIL, PERAMBRA,
KOZHIKKODE.
6 SREEDHARAN K, ACCOUNTANT (RETD), KOYILANDY TALUK
AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE MARKETINGSOCIETY LTD. NO.
1786, PERAMBRA, RESIDINGAT MALPADIKANDIMEETHAL,
PAIDOTH ROAD,PERMBRA P.O., KOZHIKKODE.
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN
SRI.P.E.SAJAL
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO
GOVERNMENT,CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,THRIUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
WPC 31333/17
2
2 THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
O/O THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETIES,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
3 THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
O/O THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
KOZHIKKODE - 673 001.
4 THE ASSISTNAT REGISTRAR OF CO-OEPRATIVE SOCIETIES
O/O ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETIES,KOYILANDY - 673 620.
5 KOYILANDY TALUK AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE
MARKETING SOCIETY LTD. NO. 1786,PERAMBRA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,PIN - 673 525.
6 THE KERALA CO-OPERATIVE EMPLOYEES PENSION BOARD
PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004,REPRESENTED
BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADVS.
SRI.M.SASINDRAN, SC
SRI.P.P.JACOB
SMT.RESMI THOMAS -GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 11.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WPC 31333/17
3
JUDGMENT
The petitioners seek a direction to respondents to implement
Ext.P2 order and they rely upon the judgment of this Court in
WP(C)No.22693/2016 - a copy of which has been produced on
record as Ext.P5.
2. Sri.P.C.Sasidharan - learned counsel for the petitioners,
submitted that the petitioners are identically situated as the ones
in the aforementioned judgment and therefore, entitled to the
same reliefs as ordered therein.
3. However, Sri.P.P.Jacob - learned counsel for the
Society, vehemently argued that Ext.P2 order is not applicable to
the petitioners since they were never engaged on substantive
basis, but only for daily wages. He explained that when the
ration shops conducted by the Society were stopped, an option
was given to the petitioners to run it - not as employees but in
the manner of a contract - and therefore, that the benefits under
Ext.P2 can never be claimed by them. He concluded his
submissions saying that, in any event, his client intends to WPC 31333/17
challenge Ext.P2, for which purpose, he sought liberty.
4. Even when I hear Sri.P.P.Jacob on the afore lines, the
fact remains that Ext.P2, prima facie, appears to deal with the
case of the petitioners also and their names have been included
in the list of persons found eligible to the benefits ordered
therein. Obviously, therefore, if the Society has a case that Ext.P2
will not apply to the petitioners, it is for them to take up the
matter appropriately with the Assistant Registrar and to obtain
necessary clarification, rather than take a stand before this Court
that it is not so.
5. When I say as afore, I am fully cognizant of the
further submissions of Sri.P.P.Jacob, that the Assistant Registrar
has no jurisdiction to issue Ext.P2. However, as long as there is
no challenge mounted against it by the Society, they cannot
impel such a contention, nor can it be countenanced by this
Court.
6. That said, I notice from Ext.P2 that the Assistant
Registrar had directed the Society to place an Action Taken
Report before him within the time frame fixed therein. Since the WPC 31333/17
petitioners say that no action has been taken in their case by the
Society until now, it is certainly for the Assistant Registrar to
initiate apposite action in terms of law.
Resultantly, I order this Writ Petition and direct the 4 th
respondent - Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies to hear
the petitioners, as also the Society and conclude further
proceedings pursuant to Ext.P2 as per law and in terms of the
various statutory provisions of the Kerala Co-operative Societies
Act and Rules.
The afore exercise shall be completed not later than three
months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Sd/-
RR DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
WPC 31333/17
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 31333/2017
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTION.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 04.5.2016.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ENTITLEMENT OF THE 1ST
PETITIONER IN TERMS OF THE PAY REVISION ORDER.
EXHIBIT P3(A) TRUE COPY OF THE ENTITLEMENT OF THE 2ND PETITIONERIN TERMS OF THE PAY REIVISION ORDER.
EXHIBIT P3(B) TRUE COPY OF THE ENTITLEMENT OF THE 3RD PETITIONER IN TERMS OF THE PAY REVISION ORDER.
EXHIBIT P3(C) TRUE COPY OF THE ENTITLEMENT OF THE 4TH PETITIONER IN TERMS OF THE PAY REVISION ORDER.
EXHIBIT P3(D) TRUE COPY OF THE ENTITLEMENT OF THE 5TH PETITIONER IN TERMS OF THE PAY REVISION ORDER.
EXHIBIT P3(E) TRUE COPY FO THE ENTITLEMENT OF THE 6TH PETITIONER IN TERMS OF THE PAY REVISION ORDER.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE CALCULATION STATMENT OF THE FIXATION OF PAY IN TERMS OF THE PAY REVISION ORDER PREPARED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P4(A) TRUE COPY OF THE CALCULATION STATMENT OF THE FIXATION OF PAY IN TERMS OF THE PAY REVISION ORDER PREPARED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P4(B) TRUE COPY OF THE CALCULATION STATMENT OF THE FIXATION OF PAY IN TERMS OF THE PAY REVISION ORDER PREPARED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P4(C) TRUE COPY OF THE CALCULATION STATMENT OF THE FIXATION OF PAY IN TERMS OF THE PAY REVISION ORDER PREPARED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P4(D) TRUE COPY OF THE CALCULATION STATMENT OF THE FIXATION OF PAY IN TERMS OF THE PAY REVISION ORDER PREPARED BY THE 5TH PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P4(E) TRUE COPY OF THE CALCULATION STATMENT OF THE FIXATION OF PAY IN TERMS OF THE PAY REVISION ORDER PREPARED BY THE 6TH PETITIONER.
WPC 31333/17
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 22693 OF 2016 DATED 10.08.2016 EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.4.2017
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!