Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 146 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 16TH POUSHA, 1944
BAIL APPL. NO. 10581 OF 2022
O. R. No.12/2022 of Forest Range Officer, Kanhangad,
Kasaragod District
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
JINEESH JAMES
AGED 37 YEARS
KALLARAKKAL HOUSE,
KARIYOTTUCHAL, MALOME VILLAGE,
P.O. CHULLY , VELLARIKUNDU TALUK., PIN - 671533
BY ADVS.
BONNY BENNY
M.RAMESH CHANDER (SR.)
BALU TOM
GOVIND G. NAIR
BEJOY JOSEPH P.J.
RESPONDENT/STATE:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, PIN - 682031
2 FOREST RANGE OFFICER
FOREST RANGE OFFICE,
KANHANGAD , KASARAGODE DISTRICT, PIN - 671315
BY ADVS.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
SHRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN, SPL. G.P. (FOREST)
OTHER PRESENT:
PP -SRI. M.C.ASHI
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 06.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME
DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
B.A. No.10581 of 2022 :2:
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
B.A. No.10581 of 2022
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Dated this the 6th day of January, 2023
ORDER
This is an application for anticipatory bail.
2. The petitioner is the sole accused in O. R. No.12/2022 of
Forest Range Officer, Kanhangad, Kasaragod District, alleging
commission of offences punishable under Section 27(i)(e)(iv) of
Kerala Forest Act, 1961 and Sections 2(16)(a), 2(20), 9, 39, and 51
of the Wild Life(Protection) Act.
3. The prosecution allegation is that, on getting secret
information, the Forest Range Officer and party conducted a search
in the house of the petitioner and found cooked meat which was
allegedly procured by the petitioner by killing a wild animal.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
petitioner has been falsely implicated in the above said crime. The
petitioner submits that he is an auto rickshaw driver and he is the
only person to take care of his family consisting of his wife who is a
cancer patient undergoing treatment at Malabar Cancer Centre.
To substantiate the same, the petitioner has produced Annexure A2
medical certificate issued by the Malabar Cancer Centre. It is the
specific case of the petitioner that the seizure was not done by the
officer who is empowered to do so and therefore the entire
procedure is vitiated.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor upon instructions submitted
that it is true that on getting information that the petitioner was in
possession of meat of wild boar, the meat was seized along with
certain weapons and utensils used for preparing the meat and to
cut the same. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no
other criminal antecedents.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case
and considering the nature of the allegations, I am of the opinion
that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be required
for the purpose of investigation and only a limited custody be
granted for the same. Therefore, I am inclined to grant bail to the
petitioner subject to stringent conditions. In the result, this
application is allowed. It is directed that the petitioner shall
surrender before the investigating officer on 12.01.2023, at 11
a.m, and subject himself for interrogation on that day and on any
other day/days as directed by the investigating officer. The
petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation. In the event of
arrest in O. R. No.12/2022 of Forest Range Officer, Kanhangad,
Kasaragod District, he shall be produced before the jurisdictional
Court on the very same day and shall be released on bail, subject
to the following conditions:-
(i) Petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of
Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two
solvent sureties each for the like-sum to the
satisfaction of the jurisdictional court ;
(ii) The petitioner shall appear before the
investigating officer in O. R. No.12/2022 of Forest
Range Officer, Kanhangad, Kasaragod District , on
every Saturday, at 11 am, until the filing of the final
report;
(iii) Petitioner shall appear before the investigating
officer in O. R. No.12/2022 of Forest Range Officer,
Kanhangad, Kasaragod District as and when
summoned to do so;
(iv) The petitioner shall not attempt to (contact the
victim or the defacto complainant) or interfere with
the investigation or to influence or intimidate any
witness in O. R. No.12/2022 of Forest Range Officer,
Kanhangad, Kasaragod District;
(v)The petitioner shall not involve in any other crime
while on bail.
If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the
investigating officer in O. R. No.12/2022 of Forest Range Officer,
Kanhangad, Kasaragod District may file an application before the
jurisdictional Court, for cancellation of bail.
It is made clear that it is within the power of the police to
investigate the matter and if necessary to effect recoveries on the
information if any given by the petitioner, even when the petitioner
is on bail as per the judgment of the Apex Court in Sushila
Aggarwal and others v. State(NCT of Delhi) and
another(2020(1)KHC 663).
Sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sm/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!