Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 129 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 16TH POUSHA, 1944
BAIL APPL. NO. 10623 OF 2022
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.2 & 3:
1 SHIJO P.K.,AGED 43 YEARS
S/O C.U.KURIAKOSE,PUNNAMTHANATHU,
MALAM P.O.,MANARCAUDU,KOTTAYAM686 019.
AREA MANAGER,M/S CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE
COMPANY PVT.LTD.,PALAI BRANCH, PIN - 686575
2 SIVAKUMAR A.N,AGED 49 YEARS
S/O A.K.NARAYANAN NAIR,EDALLUMALIL,
NATTASSERI,S.H.MOUNT P.O.,VIJAYAPURAM,KOTTAYAM
BRANCH MANAGER,M/S CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE
COMPANY PVT.LTD.,PALAI BRANCH., PIN - 686575
BY ADVS.
BINOY VASUDEVAN
SREEJITH SREENATH
RESPONDENTS/STATE:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
PIN - 682031
2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
PALAI POLICE STATION,
PALAI P.O.,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686575
OTHER PRESENT:
PP -M.C.ASHI
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
B.A. No.10623 of 2022 2
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
-------------------
B.A. No.10623 of 2022
----------------------------
Dated this the 6th day of January, 2023
ORDER
Application for anticipatory bail.
2. Petitioners are accused Nos.2 & 3 in Crime
No.3625 of 2022 of Palai Police Station, Kottayam
registered alleging commission of offences
punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 34 of IPC.
3. The prosecution allegation is that, the
petitioners are the Area Collection Manager and
Branch Manager respectively of M/s.Cholamandalam
Investment and Finance Company Pvt. Ltd attached to
its Pala Branch. It is submitted that the company
is a public limited one and is a Non-banking finance
company having its Head Quarters at Chennai and
branches all over Kerala. The Company is conducting
business strictly in accordance with the license
issued by the Reserve Bank of India.
4. The petitioners submit that they are totally
innocent of the charges levelled against them. The
1st accused entered into an agreement for sale of the
vehicle with the defacto complainant. The defacto
complainant has later on paid the amount in full and
settled the due amounts with the company.
Petitioners submit that they have been falsely
implicated in the above said crime.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners
and the learned Public Prosecutor.
6. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the
application for bail mainly contending that after
settling the whole amount the financial company has
not returned back the vehicle to the defacto
complainant. The learned counsel for the
petitioners would submit that the loan agreement
was with the 1st accused and they cannot release the
said vehicle to the defacto complainant.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of
the case, and nature of the allegations, I am of the
opinion that custodial interrogation is not required
for the purpose of investigation and only a limited
custody be granted for the same. I am inclined to
grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but on
stringent conditions. The above bail application is
allowed with the following directions. The
petitioners shall surrender before the investigating
officer on 12.01.2023 and make themselves available
for interrogation. The petitioners shall co-operate
with the investigation. In the event of arrest of
the petitioners in Crime No.3625 of 2022 of
Palai Police Station, they shall be produced before
the jurisdictional Court on the same day and be
released on bail on the following conditions:
(i) The petitioners shall execute a bond for sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;
(ii) The petitioners shall appear before the investigating officer in Crime No.3625 of 2022 of Palai Police Station, on every Saturday at 11 am, till the final report is filed and also appear as and when summoned to do so;
(iii) The petitioners shall not tamper with any evidence;
(iv) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any witness acquainted with them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;
(v) The petitioners shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.
If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated,
the Investigating Officer in Crime No.3625 of 2022
of Palai Police Station, may file an application
before the jurisdictional court for cancellation of
bail.
It is made clear that it is within the power of
the police to investigate the matter and if
necessary to effect recoveries on the information if
any given by any of the petitioners even when the
petitioners are on bail as per the judgment of the
Apex Court in Sushila Aggarwal and others v. State
(NCT of Delhi) and another (2020 (1) KHC 663).
sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM,JUDGE
pm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!