Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Beena vs T.K. Jalaludeen Musliyar
2023 Latest Caselaw 1052 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1052 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2023

Kerala High Court
Beena vs T.K. Jalaludeen Musliyar on 17 January, 2023
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                              PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
   TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 27TH POUSHA, 1944
                     OP(C) NO. 108 OF 2023
IN E.A.NO.15/2023 IN E.P.NO.48/2022 IN OS 102/2014 OF SUB COURT
                      AT PUNALUR, KOLLAM.
PETITIONER:

          BEENA,
          AGED 57 YEARS,
          D/O (LATE) SHAMSUDEEN,
          BARDH, ULIYAKOVIL,
          KOLLAM,
          PIN - 691019.

          BY ADVS.     AYYAPPAN SANKAR
                       S.HRIDYA


RESPONDENT:

          T.K. JALALUDEEN MUSLIYAR,
          AGED 80 YEARS,
          S/O (LATE) THANGAL KUNJU MUSLIYAR,
          MYSAN ARMITAGE, KILIKOLLOOR,
          KOLLAM,
          PIN - 691004

          SMT. A.JANI

      THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
17.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 O.P.(C)No.108/2023

                                      -:2:-




                     Dated this the 17th day of January,2023

                             JUDGMENT

The original petition is filed to direct the Court of

the Subordinate Judge, Kollam, to re-consider the

request of the petitioner in Ext P2 application.

2. The concise case of the petitioner, relevant

for the determination of the original petition, is: she

was the plaintiff in O.S.No.102/2014 before the court

below, filed against the respondent, for a decree for

cancellation of a sale deed and other ancillary reliefs.

The respondent raised a counter claim for a decree of

mandatory injunction. The suit was decreed and the

counter claim was dismissed. The respondent

challenged the decree before this Court in

R.F.A.No.172/2020. This Court, reversed the impugned

decree by dismissing the suit and decreeing the

counter claim. The petitioner was directed to give O.P.(C)No.108/2023

vacant possession of the building to the respondent.

Even though the petitioner challenged the judgment

before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the SLP was

dismissed. The respondent has laid the decree to

execution by filing E.P.No.48/2022. The petitioner is

totally bedridden and needs six months' time to vacate

the building. Although, she filed Ext P2 application

seeking further time to vacate the premises, the

Execution Court dismissed Ext P2 application. The

petitioner has not received the copy of the order

passed in Ext P2. Hence, the original petition.

3. Heard; Sri. Ayyappan Sankar, the learned

counsel appearing for the petitioner and

Smt. A. Jani, the learned counsel appearing for the

respondent.

4. On an analysis of the pleadings and materials

on record, it can be gathered that, this Court had O.P.(C)No.108/2023

directed the petitioner to vacate the building within

three months from 16.11.2022. Admittedly, the

judgment has become final and the time period to

vacate the building has lapsed.

5. The petitioner's present prayer is that she

requires six months more time to vacate the building.

6. It is trite, the Execution Court cannot go

beyond the decree.

7. In the above background, I am of the view

that the petitioner's remedy is to move this Court in

R.F.A.No.172/2020 and seek for enlargement of time,

rather than filing an application before the Execution

Court. Furthermore, judicial discipline warrants me to

adopt the above course.

In the result, with out prejudice to the right of the

petitioner to work out her remedies as observed above,

the original petition is dismissed. In order to enable O.P.(C)No.108/2023

the petitioner to move this Court in R.F.A.No.172/2020,

the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Kollam, is directed

to defer the delivery of the property in E.P.No.48/2022

till 27.01.2023.

Sd/-


                                 C.S.DIAS,JUDGE

DST/17.01.23                                   //True copy//

                                               P.A.To Judge
 O.P.(C)No.108/2023






                             APPENDIX



PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1          TRUE COPY OF THE EXECUTION PETITION E.P.

NO.48/2022 IN O.S. NO.102/2014 DATED 5.7.2022 ON THE FILE OF SUB COURT, KOLLAM

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION E.A. NO.15/2023 IN E.P. NO.48/2022 IN O.S. NO.102/2014 DATED 10.1.2023 ON THE FILE OF SUB COURT, KOLLAM FOR TIME TO VACATE AND TO KEEP ORDER FOR DELIVERY IN ABEYANCE

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ADVANCE PETITION IN E.P.

NO.48/2022 IN O.S. NO.102/2014 DATED 10.1.2023 ON THE FILE OF SUB COURT, KOLLAM

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PRINT OUT OF PROCEEDINGS OF HON'BLE SUB COURT, KOLLAM IN E.P.

NO.48/2022 IN O.S. NO.102/2014 ON 3.1.2023

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter