Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1791 Ker
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 12TH MAGHA, 1944
CRL.MC NO. 390 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 127/2020 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS
MAGISTRATE COURT, KARUNAGAPPALLY
PETITIONERS:
1 SIYAD HUSSAIN,
AGED 36 YEARS,
S/O SEENATHU BEVI, KAITHAVILA VADAKKATHIL (H),
SOUTH MYNAGAPPALLY, MYNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM,
PIN - 690 519.
2 AJMAL,
AGED 21 YEARS,
S/O ABDUL SAMAD, VILAYIL PADINJATTATHIL (H),
MARARITHOTTAM, KALLELIBHAGAM, KOLLAM, PIN - 690 519.
3 SHAFEEK K,
AGED 28 YEARS,
S/O. OOMERKUTTY, MAHADEVAN COLANY, KALLELIBHAGAM P.O.,
KARUNAGAPALLY KOLLAM, PIN - 690 519.
BY ADV AISWARYA E J VETTIKOMPIL
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 031.
2 SHAHIR S.,
AGED 24 YEARS, S/O SHAJI, KATTOOR THEKKATHIL (H),
KALLELIBHAGOM P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM,
PIN - 690 519.
PP SEETHA S,ADV.CHRISTINE MATHEW
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.MC NO.390 OF 2023
2
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
--------------------------------
Crl.M.C.No.390 of 2023
---------------------------------
Dated this the 1st day of February, 2023
ORDER
Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C
to quash all proceedings against them.
2. Petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 3 in C.C.No.127 of 2020 on the
files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Karunagappally
registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323 r/w Section 34 of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860. The 2nd respondent is the defacto complainant.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned
counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned Public Prosecutor.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the
matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the
petitioners ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering
the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by
continuing the proceedings.
5. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10
SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High
Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the
victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings. This
view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v. State of CRL.MC NO.390 OF 2023
Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra Yadav and
Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].
6. I have perused Annexure-3 affidavit filed by the 2nd respondent.
The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon verification, it is
understood that the affidavit is genuine, and the defacto complainant
stands by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the matter has been
settled and no public interest is involved in this case. There is no
impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. The continuance of the
proceedings will only be an exercise in futility.
7. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioners in
C.C.No.127 of 2020 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate
Court, Karunagappally are quashed.
This Crl.M.C is allowed.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE ak CRL.MC NO.390 OF 2023
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 390/2023
PETITIONERS ANNEXURES:-
Annexure 1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.
125/2020 OF KARUNAGAPPALLY POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT
Annexure 2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.125/2020 OF KARUNAGAPPALLY POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT
Annexure 3 THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT
RESPONDENTS ANNEXURES:-NIL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!