Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13732 Ker
Judgement Date : 26 December, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 5TH POUSHA, 1945
BAIL APPL. NO. 11465 OF 2023
CRIME NO.957/2023 OF Erumeli Police Station, Kottayam
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CRMP 3480/2023 OF DISTRICT COURT &
SESSIONS COURT,KOTTAYAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
ARUN JOY
AGED 35 YEARS
S/O JOY, 3-A COTTAGE, PALLIKKARA,
PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689101
BY ADV DEEPAK TWINKLE SANAL
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA. ERNAKULAM., PIN - 682031
2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER
ERUMELI POLICE STATION, KOTTAYAM., PIN - 686509
3 BIBIN PHILIP
S/O PHILIP VARGHEESE, THAREMALAYIL HOUSE, ERUMELI,
KOTTAYAM., PIN - 686509
SMT. SEETHA. S, SR.PP
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
26.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BAIL APPL. NO. 11465 OF 2023
2
P.G. AJITHKUMAR, J.
-------------------------------
B.A.No. 11465 of 2023
--------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 26th day of December, 2023
ORDER
This is an application for anticipatory bail filed under Section
438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
2. The petitioner is the sole accused in crime No.957 of
2023 of Erumeli Police Station. The offences alleged against the
petitioner are punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC.
3. The prosecution case is that promising to secure a job
Visa in New Zealand, the petitioner had caused the defacto
complainant and his friend to transfer funds worth Rs.18,00,000/-
by way of transferring Rs.17.5 lakhs to the account bearing
No.017607518316190001 of the petitioner with the Thodupuzha
branch of Catholic Syrian Bank and Rs.50,000/- by direct payment
during the period from 01.02.2023 and 15.06.2023. Despite
receiving the money, the petitioner did not provide Visa as assured
and thus he had cheated the defacto complainant and his friend. BAIL APPL. NO. 11465 OF 2023
He did not repay the amount also.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned Public Prosecutor.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend
that petitioner as per the assurance provided VISA and on a
misconception only a complaint was lodged against him. It is
further submitted that the learned Sessions Judge after
considering the entire materials on record observed that the arrest
and detention of the petitioner was unnecessary for the purpose of
investigation into the matter. However, for untenable reasons the
petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed. It is his contention that
considering the nature of the offences alleged against him, his
custodial interrogation is absolutely unnecessary.
6. The learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, would
contend that the petitioner has actively involved in the commission
of the offence and as such, his custodial interrogation is absolutely
necessary. Therefore, the application is liable only to be dismissed.
7. Considering the whole circumstances of the alleged act
of offence in the light of the materials on record, I am of the view BAIL APPL. NO. 11465 OF 2023
that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is appeared
unnecessary. Hence, he can be granted anticipatory bail on strict
conditions.
9. In the result, this bail application is allowed and the
petitioner is directed to surrender before the investigating officer
within two weeks. After interrogation and in the event of his being
arrested, he shall be released on bail on the execution of a bond
for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only), with two solvent
sureties for the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the
investigating officer, and on the following conditions:
(i) He shall appear before the Investigating Officer on every Tuesday and Friday for a period of three months or till the final report is filed, whichever is earlier;
(ii) He shall not leave the limits of the jurisdictional court without prior permission of the Magistrate until further orders;
(iii) He shall not go abroad without the permission of the jurisdictional Court and shall surrender his passport before the investigating officer, and in case he does not have a passport, he shall file an affidavit to that BAIL APPL. NO. 11465 OF 2023
effect;
(iv) He shall not influence or intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence; and
(v) During the bail period, he shall not get involved in any offence.
In case of breach of the bail conditions, the prosecution shall
be at liberty to apply for cancellation of the bail before the
jurisdictional court.
Sd/-
P.G. AJITHKUMAR JUDGE nak BAIL APPL. NO. 11465 OF 2023
APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 11465/2023
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14/12/2023 IN CRL.MP 3480/2023 OF THE SESSIONS COURT; KOTTAYAM
Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE DATED 1/11/2023
Annexure A3 TRUE COPY OF THE EMPLOYMENT VISA
Annexure A4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT
Annexure A5 TRUE COPY OF THE F.I.R DATED 07/09/2023 ERUMELI POLICE STATION ,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT
Annexure A6 TRUE COPY OF THE BANK STATEMENT OF THE AMOUNT TRANSFERRED DATED NIL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!