Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12904 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 December, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
Friday, the 8th day of December 2023 / 17th Agrahayana, 1945
CRL.MC NO. 2792 OF 2023
CRIME NO.1184/2022 OF KOLLAM EAST POLICE STATION, KOLLAM
SC No.867/2023 OF THE FAST TRACK SPECIAL COURT,KOLLAM
PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED:
VIPIN V., S/O.M.C.VIJAYAKUMAR AGED 38 YEARS VIMALALAYAM, SRP MARKET
P.O., SOUTH EAST OF THAZHAVA, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM , PIN - 690539
RESPONDENTS/STATE AND THE COMPLAINANT:
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, PIN - 682031
AND 2 OTHERS
This CRL.MC coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and
this court's order dated 03/04/2023 in Crl.MC.2792/2023 and upon hearing
the arguments of M/S.B.MOHANLAL,ASWIN V. NAIR,Advocates for the
petitioner, and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the 1st and 2nd respondents, the
court passed the following:
p.t.o.
GOPINATH P., J
-------------------------------------
Crl.M.C. No.2792 of 2023
-------------------------------------
Dated this the 8th day of December, 2023
ORDER
Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned Public Prosecutor and having regard to the
judgments of the Supreme Court in Dhruvaram
Murlidhar Sonar (Dr.) v. State of Maharashtra and
Others; 2019 (1) KHC 403 (SC), Pramod Suryabhan
Pawar v. State of Maharashtra and Another; AIR 2019
Supreme Court 4010: AIROnline 2019 SC 904 , and
Mandar Deepak Pawar V. The State of Maharashtra
and Another [2022 LiveLaw (SC) 649] , prima facie I am
of the view that the petitioner is entitled to an interim
order staying further proceedings in S.C.No.867/2023 on
the file of the Fast Track Special Court, Kollam.
Therefore, all further proceedings against the
petitioner in S.C.No.867/2023 on the file of the Fast Track
Special Court, Kollam, will stand stayed for a period of two
months. This order is being granted taking into
consideration the submission of the learned counsel for the
petitioner that admittedly the petitioner and the defacto
complainant/victim were in a relationship for the period
from 2008 to 2013. Despite service of notice there is no
representation for the 3rd respondent. Petitioner shall take
out fresh notice to the 3rd respondent.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P. JUDGE ats
08-12-2023 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!