Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12851 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 December, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 37795 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
SHAFI.M.M
AGED 38 YEARS
S/O. MAJEED,
MADATHILPARAMBIL HOUSE,
KOOLIMUTTAM P.O.,
PROPRIETOR CLICK HOME DELIVERY SERVICES,
MATHILAKAM P.O.
THRISSUR DISTRICT., PIN - 680685
BY ADVS.
P.JINISH PAUL
SNEHA V.
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER OF FOOD SAFETY,
COMMISSIONERATE OF FOOD SAFETY,
FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARD AUTHORITY OF INDIA,
THYCAUD.P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695014
2 THE SECRETARY
MATHILAKOM GRAMA PANCHAYAT,
MATHLAKOM P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT., PIN - 680685
BY ADVS.
NOUSHAD K A
AMRIN FATHIMA(K/224/2016)
W.P.(C).No.37795 of 2023
-:2:-
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY
SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 08.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C).No.37795 of 2023
-:3:-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
-----------------------------------------
W.P.(C).No.37795 of 2023
-------------------------------------------
Dated this the 8th day of December, 2023
JUDGMENT
Petitioner had applied for a trade licence for conducting a home
delivery business of various products including food. He has obtained a
registration certificate from the Food Safety and Standards Authority of
India. Petitioner's application before the second respondent was
acknowledged as per Ext.P4 dated 05.01.2023. Petitioner complains
that despite lapse of almost eleven months, the second respondent has
not taken any decision on the said application.
2. Having heard Sri. Jinish Paul, the learned counsel for the
petitioner and Sri. K.A.Noushad, the learned Standing Counsel for the
second respondent as well as Smt. K.Amminikutty, the learned Senior
Government Pleader, I am of the view that, petitioner's application for
trade licence is required to be considered in a time bound manner. The
statute provides a specific time limit within which the application has to
be considered, failing which, a deemed licence can also be claimed by
the applicant.
3. In the above circumstances, there will be a direction to the 2 nd
respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on the application
evidenced by Ext.P4 acknowledgment certificate, as expeditiously as
possible, at any rate, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt
of a copy of this judgment. Considering the circumstances,
proceedings pursuant to Ext.P7 shall be kept in abeyance till a decision
is taken as directed.
Writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE
Jka/08.12.23.
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 37795/2023
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RENTAL AGREEMENT DATED 05-01-2023.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE UDYAM REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE DATED 26-02-2021.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE DATED 05-01-2023 ALONG WITH CONNECTED DOCUMENTS.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT RECEIPT
05-01-2023 ISSUED FROM THE 2ND
RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE E-CHALLAN DATED 02-01-
2023.
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION ALONG
WITH NON-OBJECTION LETTER DATED 22-12- 2022.
Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 13-10-2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!