Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12740 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 December, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA,
1945
CRL.MC NO. 1398 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT ST 183/2018 OF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II,PERINTHALMANNA
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:
1 M/S. BHARAT PARANTERALS LTD.
SURVEY NO.144 AND 146, JAROD, SAMIYA ROAD,
HARIPURA VILLAGE, SAVLI TALUKA, VADODARA
DISTRICT, GUJARAT. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING
DIRECTOR, BHARAT R. DESAI, S/O. RAMACHANDRA
DESAI, AGED 57 YEARS,10/A, RANCHOD PARK CO-
OPERATIVE SOCIETY, VIP ROAD, AMIT NAGAR CIRCLE,
HARNI, VADODARA, GUJARAT.,
PIN - 390019
2 BHARAT R. DESAI
S/O. RAMACHANDRA DESAI, AGED 57 YEARS,10/A,
RANCHOD PARK CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, VIP ROAD,
AMIT NAGAR CIRCLE, HARNI, VADODARA, GUJARAT.,
PIN - 390019
3 HEMANG J SHAH
S/O. JAYEBDRABHAI SHAH, AGED 52 YEARS, 27,
PARITOSH SOCIETY, MAHAVIR CHAR RASTA, B/H,
PRAHAR COMPLEX, HARNI, VADODARA, GUJARAT., PIN
- 390019
BY ADVS.
T.D.SUSMITH KUMAR
C.SIVADAS
T.O.DEEPA
RESPONDENTS/STATE/COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH
COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM., PIN - 682031
Crl.M.C.No.1398/2022
..2..
2 DRUG INSPECTOR
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT DRUG CONTROLLER, CIVIL
STATION, KOZHIKODE., PIN - 673020
BY ADVS.
ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA
ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION(AG-11)
SRI GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE, ADGP
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
08.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C.No.1398/2022
..3..
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE
=========================
Crl.M.C.No.1398 of 2022
==========================
Dated this the 8th day of December, 2023
ORDER
This Criminal Miscellaneous Case is filed with the
following prayer:
"On the aforesaid grounds and such other grounds to be urged during the hearing, it is respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to quash Annexure A-2, the Complaint in ST No.183 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Perinthalmanna, and all further proceedings thereof. And also pass any other order or orders which are deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
2. S.T.No.183/2018 pending before Judicial First Class
Magistrate Court-II, Perinthalmanna, is initiated alleging
offences under the provisions of Drugs and Cosmetic Act,
1940. One of the contention raised by the petitioners is that
the complaint is filed after the period mentioned in Section 468
CrPC. This Court directed the Registry to get a report for the
same. A report is submitted by the learned Magistrate. It will
..4..
be better to extract the same:
"On perusal of the case records in ST 183/18, it is seen that the complaint as well as the delay condonation petition (CMP 359/18) were filed on 08-08-2018 before my predecessor's predecessor in office. I may further submit that even though the complaint was taken on file as the above number, no order is seen passed in the delay ondonation petition. I may most humbly submit that I took charge in this court on 0-06-2021 and that I had opportnity to consider this matter only after post cognizance stage and within a short time thereafter it was submitted that matter has been stayed by Hon'ble High Court. The above facts are most humbly submitted for kind consideration."
3. From the above, it is clear that the learned
Magistrate taken on file the complaint without passing orders
in the Delay Condonation Petition. Admittedly, there is a delay.
If that is the case, taking congnizance of the offence without
passing orders in the Delay Condonation Petition is illegal.
Therefore, taking congnizance of the offence on the complaint
can be set aside and there can be a direction to reconsider the
matter. The learned Magistrate will consider the Delay
Condonation Petition first with notice to the petitioners and
thereafter, decide whether the case is to be taken on file.
..5..
Therefore this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is disposed of
with the following direction:
The order taking cognizance of the offence based on
Annexure A2 complaint is set aside. The Judicial First Class
Magistrate Court II, Perinthalmanna, is directed to consider the
petition filed to condone the delay, which is filed along with the
complaint first with notice to the petitioner and thereafter, will
decide whether Annexure A2 complaint is to be taken on file or
not. While deciding the matter, the learned Magistrate will
consider Section 473 CrPC also.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE ACR
..6..
PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A-1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE MAHAZAR DATED 23-09- 2013 PREPARED BY THE COMPLAINANT. Annexure A-2 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE COMPLAINT IN ST NO.183 OF 2018 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, PERINTHALMANNA. Annexure A-3 A TRUE COPY OF LETTER NO. NO. L-
1949/2014/DC DATED 04-03-2016 ISSUED BY THE DRUG INSPECTOR(SPECIAL INTELLIGENCE BRANCH).
Annexure A-4 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 16-03-2016 ADDRESSED TO DRUG INSPECTOR(SIB). Annexure A-5 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 17-01-2012 ADDRESSED TO THE COMMISSIONER, FOOD & DRUGS CONTROL ADMINISTRATION, GANDHINAGAR. Annexure A-6 A TRUE COPY OF THE DEVIATION REQUEST FORM DATED 01-01-2012 PERTAINING TO BATCH NO. BPIFL 0035.
Annexure A-7 A TRUE COPY OF THE PRIMARY LABEL AND LABEL OF THE CARTON PERTAINING TO BATCH NO. BPIFL 0035.
Annexure A-8 A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION OF THE FINISHED PACKS OF ORAL LIQUID PERTAINING TO BATCH NO. BPIFL 0035.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!