Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9111 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 1ST BHADRA, 1945
WA NO. 1263 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT WP(C) 34272/2008 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
CANNANORE COUNTY CLUB & RESORTS (P)
LTD.KATTAMPALLY, NARATH.P.O,
KANNUR, REP.BY ITS, DIRECTOR
MR.R.ANANTHA KRISHNAN., PIN - 670601
BY ADVS.
K.PRAVEEN KUMAR
N.KRISHNA PRASAD
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 IN THE WRIT PETITION :
1 KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695004
2 THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER
ELECTRICAL CIRCLE,
VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM,
KANNUR, PIN - 670002
3 THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION,
VALAPATTANAM, KANNUR, PIN - 670010
4 THE SUB ENGINEER IN CHARGE
ELECTRICAL SECTION, KOLACHERRY, PIN - 670601
BY SRI. B PREMOD, SC
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WA No.1263 of 2023
2
DR. A.K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR & MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.JJ
......................................................
WA No.1263 of 2023
.................................................................
Dated this the 23rd day of August, 2023
JUDGMENT
Mohammed Nias.C.P.J
The appellant, the writ petitioner, is aggrieved by the judgment
in WP(C) No. 34272 of 2008 dated 23.05.2020, dismissing the writ
petition filed challenging the demand of the respondents alleging
unauthorized load under the provisions of the Electricity Act,2003.
2. By the impugned judgment, the learned single Judge found
that the appellant has an alternate remedy against the action
proposed under Section 126 of the Electricity Act 2003. However,
without giving any liberty to the petitioner to avail the same, the writ
petition was dismissed.
3. Though the learned senior counsel for the appellant
submitted that the action under Section 126 of the Electricity Act,
2003, was bad for violation of the statutory provisions, we do not
intend to consider the same on merits as the appellant can challenge
the same in the statutory appeal.
WA No.1263 of 2023
4. Accordingly, this writ appeal is disposed of, directing the
appellant to avail the statutory alternate remedy within a month from
today. We note that the appellant has already paid 1/3rd of the
demand pursuant to the orders of this court. The appellant will pay
the balance to make up to 50% of the demand while preferring the
appeal. On the appellant preferring the appeal along with the
payment as directed above, the appellate authority will consider the
same in accordance with the law and pass orders dealing with the
contentions of the appellant within a month thereafter.
The writ appeal is disposed of as above.
Sd/-DR. A.K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
Sd/-MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
JUDGE
dlk/23.8.2023 WA No.1263 of 2023
APPENDIX OF WA 1263/2023 PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES AnnexureA1 TRUE COPY OF THE SRO.NO.229/2005 AnnexureA2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 7.4.2014 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.19000 OF 2010 AnnexureA3 TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 31.01.2020
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!