Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Joseph C. A vs The Assistant General Manager
2023 Latest Caselaw 8741 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8741 Ker
Judgement Date : 9 August, 2023

Kerala High Court
Joseph C. A vs The Assistant General Manager on 9 August, 2023
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                            PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

  WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 18TH SRAVANA, 1945

                      WP(C) NO. 2312 OF 2022

PETITIONER:

          JOSEPH C. A., AGED 60 YEARS
          ADVOCATE CHURATHIL HOUSE, KUDAYATHOOR P. O.,
          THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685587.

          BY ADV AYSHA RAHMAN


RESPONDENTS:

    1     THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
          ZONAL OFFICE, STATE BANK OF INDIA, PANAMPALLY NAGAR,
          KOCHI, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

    2     THE CHIEF MANAGER
          STATE BANK OF INDIA, RACC, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI
          DISTRICT, PIN - 685587.

    3     THE BRANCH MANAGER
          STATE BANK OF INDIA, MUTTOM BRANCH, THODUPUZHA,
          IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN - 685587.

          BY ADVS.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI (SR.)
          S.AMBILY


      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
09.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C)NO.2312 OF 2022

                            :: 2 ::




                          JUDGMENT

Dated this the 9th day of August 2023

The writ petition is filed to direct the respondents

to permit the petitioner to pay the overdue amounts in

instalments and regularise the loan accounts.

2. The petitioner's case is that, he had availed two

loans from the respondent - Bank by creating an

equitable mortgage by deposit of title deeds. Due to

Covid 19 pandemic and other reasons beyond his

control, he could not pay the instalments on time. The

respondents have now issued Ext.P1 notice under

Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction

of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security

Interest Act (in short, 'Act') demanding the petitioner to

close the loan accounts. The petitioner is willing to pay

the overdue amount in equated monthly instalments WP(C)NO.2312 OF 2022

:: 3 ::

and regularise the loan accounts. Hence, the writ

petition.

3. Heard; Sri.Aysha Rahman, the learned counsel

for the petitioner and Smt.S.Ambily, the learned

counsel appearing for the respondents.

4. Smt.S.Ambily, on instructions, submitted that

the petitioner had availed three loans - one educational

loan and two other loans. The overdue amount in the

educational loan is Rs.64,702/-. The petitioner will have

to pay the said overdue amount in one instalment. In

respect of the other two loans, the amount due is

Rs.7,77,162/-. The respondents are willing to permit

the petitioner to pay the above overdue amount in the

said loan accounts in six equated monthly instalments.

The said submission is recorded.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

submitted that the petitioner is ready to accept the

above offer made by the respondents. WP(C)NO.2312 OF 2022

:: 4 ::

6. Having considered the pleadings and materials

on record and the submission made by the learned

counsel appearing for the parties, I am inclined to

exercise the powers of this Court under Article 226 of

the Constitution of India and dispose of the writ

petition.

Resultantly, I dispose of the writ petition in the

following manner:

(i) The respondents are directed to defer further coercive proceedings pursuant to Ext.P1 to enable the petitioner to pay the overdue amount in instalments.

(ii) The petitioner is permitted to pay the overdue amount of Rs.64,702/- in the educational loan on or before 8.9.2023 along with regular instalments.

(iii) The petitioner is also permitted to pay the overdue amount in the two loan accounts amounting to Rs.7,77,162/- in eight equated monthly instalments commencing from 9.9.2023 along with regular instalments.

(iv) Needless to mention, if the petitioner commits default of the condition ordered above, he would lose the benefit of this judgment and WP(C)NO.2312 OF 2022

:: 5 ::

the respondent would be at liberty to proceed with recovery proceedings from the stage it presently stands.

(v) It is made clear that, no further application for modification/extension of time shall be entertained.

sd/-

C.S.DIAS JUDGE jes WP(C)NO.2312 OF 2022

:: 6 ::

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 2312/2022

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 12.01.2022 ISSUED 2ND RESPONDENT.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter