Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8490 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 16TH SRAVANA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 24683 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
1 HASHIM SHAMSUDHEEN,
AGED 42 YEARS
21/667, THEKEPALAVILA, THATTAMALA P.O,
PADEINJARE PADANILAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691020
BY ADV H.PRAVEEN (KOTTARAKARA)
RESPONDENTS:
1 ICICI BANK LTD.,
REPRESNTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER,
REGIONAL OFFICE, CREATIVE COMPLEX,
NEAR FIRE STATION, KADAPPAKADA,
KOLLAM - 691 008
2 THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER,
ICICI BANK LTD, REGIONAL OFFICE,
CREATIVE COMPLEX, NEAR FIRE STATION,
KADAPPAKADA, KOLLAM, PIN - 691008
BY ADV PRADEESH CHACKO
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
07.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WPC No.24683 of 2023
2
C. S. DIAS, J.
-------------------------
W.P.(C.) No.24683 of 2023
-------------------------
Dated this the 07th day of August, 2023
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed to direct the
respondents to permit the petitioner to pay the
overdue amount in instalments and regularise the
loan account.
2. The petitioner's case is that, he had availed
financial assistance from the first respondent
bank to purchase two motor vehicles. Due to
reasons beyond his control, he could not pay the
instalments on time. The respondents have
proceeded against the vehicles under the
Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial
Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
(in short, 'Act') and is threatening to take WPC No.24683 of 2023
physical possession of the same. The petitioner is
willing to pay the overdue amount in instalments
and regularise the loan account. Hence, the writ
petition.
3. Heard; Sri.Praveen Harikumar, the learned
Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.
Pradeesh Chacko, the learned Counsel appearing
for the respondents.
4. Sri. Pradeesh Chacko, on instructions
submitted that the petitioner has in violation of
the conditions of the contract, sold the two
vehicles. It is with great difficulty that the
respondents could repossess one vehicle. The
second vehicle is in possession of a third party.
The respondents are not willing to extend any
facility to the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition
may be dismissed.
5. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in South
Indian Bank Ltd vs. Naveen Mathew Philip WPC No.24683 of 2023
(2023 LiveLaw (SC) 320), after adverting to a
myriad of earlier judicial pronouncements
rendered under the Act, has categorically
declared that High Courts shall not, unless in
extra ordinary circumstances, interfere with
proceedings initiated under the Act, in writ
proceedings under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India.
6. Having considered the pleadings and
materials on record and after appreciating the
rival submissions across the Bar, I am of the
definite view that there are no extraordinary
circumstances made out to entertain the writ
petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India. Nonetheless, it will be upto the petitioner
to workout his statutory remedies, in
accordance with law.
Resultantly, the writ petition is dismissed WPC No.24683 of 2023
without prejudice to the right of the petitioner
to workout his statutory remedies, in
accordance with law.
Sd/-
C. S. DIAS JUDGE SKP/07-08 WPC No.24683 of 2023
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 24683/2023
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, KOLLAM DATED 11/7/2023 IN MC NO. 413/2023 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT R(1)(A) TRUE COPY OF PREPAYMENT LETTER DATED 3.8.2023
TRUE COPY
P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!