Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5290 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 April, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 4TH VAISAKHA, 1945
CRL.REV.PET NO. 777 OF 2004
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.11.1999 IN ST 1801/1996 OF
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT,MANNARKAD
REVISION PETITIONER/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
K.BALATHARAKAN, KODIKANNATH HOUSE,
EDATHANATTUKARA, VATTAMANNAPURAM P.O., PALAKKAD
DISTRICT.
BY ADV SMT.VANAJA MADHAVAN (EXPIRED)
RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED AND COMPLAINANT:
1 VENUGOPALAN, S/O. GOPALAKRISHNAN, PALAKKAL
HOUSE, EDATHANATTUKARA,, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
2 SANKARAN, S/O. CHAMI, AYNIKOTTIL HOUSE,
EDATHANATTUKARA,, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
3 STATE OF KERALA REP.BY SUB INSPECTOR
OF POLICE, NATTUKAL, MANNARKKAD.
ADV. SRI.SUNIL KUMAR KURIAKOSE PP
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 24.04.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.REV.PET NO. 777 OF 2004
..2..
O R D E R
This revision petition was preferred by the
defacto complainant in a prosecution lodged by the
Sub Inspector of Police, Nattukal against the
respondents, who are the accused for the offences
punishable under Section 447 and 427 r/w 34 of the
Indian Penal code.
2. In Trial Court, for want of evidence,
acquitted the accused.
3. When the matter has came up for
consideration today, the learned counsel for the
revision petitioner submits that the revision
petitioner is no more. I perused the impugned order.
There is nothing on record warranting interference.
The learned counsel for the revision petitioner
submits that nothing further survives in this matter
inasmuch as that the petitioner is no more. The
revision petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE PR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!