Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4678 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 22ND CHAITHRA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 13011 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
CHENGOTTUR MUNEERUL ISLAM SANGHAM
REG.NO.79/1973, CHENGOTTUR PO, VIA KOTTAKKAL,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
KUNJALI, S/O AYAMU, PULLIYIL HOUSE,
CHENGOTTUR PO, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676503
BY ADV R.RAMADAS
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF/
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE/
DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676122
2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICE/
CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
KOTTAKKAL POLICE STATION,
KOTTAKKAL, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676501
3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
KOTTAKKAL POLICE STATION,
KOTTAKKAL, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676501
4 ADVOCATE N.M. MADHU
ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM (ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER APPOINTED AS PER
JUDGMENT DATED 01.11.2019 IN W.P.(C)
NO.25099/2019) CHAMBER NO.315, CHAMBER COMPLEX,
NEAR HIGH COURT, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
WP(C) No.13011 of 2023
2
5 KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
VIP ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI, PIN - 682017
SRI.E.C. BINEESH, GP
SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ, SC
SRI.N.M. MADHU, ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 12.04.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) No.13011 of 2023
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 12th day of April, 2023
Petitioner is the Chengottur Muneerul Islam Sangham,
represented by its Secretary. The petitioner is before this
Court seeking to command respondents 1 to 3 to provide
necessary police assistance to the 4th respondent, who is the
Advocate Commissioner appointed by this Court for the
peaceful conduct of election, as and when required by the
4th respondent.
2. From the pleadings, it is evident that this Court as
per Ext.P1 judgment in W.P.(C) No.25099 of 2019 has
appointed the 4th respondent as Advocate Commissioner for
conducting election to the petitioner-Sangham.
3. The petitioner would submit that there is likelihood
of law and order issues in the conduct of the election and WP(C) No.13011 of 2023
unless respondents 1 to 3 extend sufficient assistance and
protection, the Advocate Commissioner will not be able to
conduct the election peacefully.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner,
the learned Government Pleader representing respondents 1
to 3, the 4th respondent-Advocate Commissioner and the
learned Standing Counsel appearing for the
5th respondent.
5. Taking into consideration the fact that this Court
has considered the necessity of conducting an election to the
petitioner-Sangham and has appointed the 4 th respondent as
Advocate Commissioner as per judgment dated 01.11.2019 in
W.P.(C) No.25099 of 2019, it is incumbent upon respondents
1 to 3 to ensure that the election is being conducted
peacefully without any external obstruction or interference.
In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of
directing that the respondents 2 and 3 shall extend adequate WP(C) No.13011 of 2023
protection for the conduct of election to the petitioner-
Sangham as and when the 4th respondent makes a request
for police assistance.
Sd/-
N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk WP(C) No.13011 of 2023
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13011/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 01.11.2019 IN W.P. (C) NO.25099/2019 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 07.02.2023 IN W.P. (C) NO.25099/2019 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTION NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER DATED NIL Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED NIL PUBLISHED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!