Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4663 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 22ND CHAITHRA, 1945
MACA NO. 1217 OF 2014
AGAINST THE AWARD DATED 09.10.2013 IN O.P(MV) NO.1777/2006 OF ADDITIONAL MOTOR
ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, ALAPPUZHA.
APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS:
1 SAROJINI AMM,
AGED 59 YEARS,
W/O.RAVEENDRANATH,
RAJANI NIVAS, MANNANCHERY P.O.,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
2 RAJANI,
AGED 29 YEARS,
D/O.RAVEENDRANATH, RAJANI NIVAS,
MANNANCHERY P.O.,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT
3 ABHILASH R RAVI,
AGED 28 YEARS,
S/O.RAVEENDRANATH, RAJANI NIVAS,
MANNANCHERY P.O.,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
4 LAKSHMIKUTTY AMMA,
AGED 82 YEARS,
W/O.KESAAPILLAI, PALAKKODU VEETTIL,
VALAMANGALAM, THURAVOOR P.O.,
CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.P.G.SURESH
SRI.HARISH VASUDEVAN
SRI.RAJAN VISHNURAJ
SRI.G.SUDHEER
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1 P.S.SHAMEEN,
S/O.SAITHA SAINALBDHEEN, PARAPARAMBATH HOUSE, MADAVANA, PANAANGAD
P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 506.
2 JUSTINE,
S/O.JOSEPH, VALLACHIRA VEETTIL,
KODAMTHURUTH P.O.,
CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 524.
3 THE MANAGER,
NATIONAL INSURACE COMPANY LTD, THRIPPONITHURA BRANCH,
THRIPPONITHURA P.O.,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 301,
(INSURER OF THE BUS BEARING REG. NO.KL-6A.3799).
MACA NO. 1217 OF 2014
2
4 NAVAS,
S/O.SEETHI,
MUDAPPANA VEETTIL,
KANJIRAMATTOM, MARATHAZHAM P.O.,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 315.
(OWNER OF LORRY BEARING REG.NO.KL-7-AU-1143).
5 SANAKRANKUTTY,
S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, MATTATHIL HOSUE,
KADAPARA DESAM, POIKA P.O.,
THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 001.
(DRIVER OF LORRY BEARING REG.NO.KL-7-AU-1143).
6 THE MANAGER
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD,
JYOTHI BAZAR, THODUPUZHA P.O.,
IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 584.
(INSURER OF THE LORRY BEARING REG.NO.KL-7-AU-1143).
BY ADVS.
SRI.ALEXY AUGUSTINE
SRI.GEORGE CHERIAN SR.
SMT.LATHA SUSAN CHERIAN
SMT.SARAH SALVY
SMT.K.S.SANTHI
THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
12.04.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
MACA NO. 1217 OF 2014
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 12th day of April, 2023.
Appeal was posted for hearing on this day. There was no
representation for the appellants.
2. Representation was not there for the appellants even on
the last posting date. This Court had directed the counsel
representing the appellants to come and argue the matter this day.
He did not turn up to argue.
In the above circumstances, appeal stands dismissed for non
prosecution.
Sd/-
MARY JOSEPH
JUDGE JJ
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!