Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10655 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 29TH ASWINA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 33675 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
BIJU SEBASTIAN
AGED 48 YEARS
S/O. BENNY BAIJU, THEVALAKKARA HOUSE,
IE NAGAR P.O., CHANGANASSERY,
KOTTAYAM-686106.
BY ADV K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE SECRETARY,
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
IDUKKI, CIVIL STATION, KUYILIMALA,
PAINAVU POST, IDUKKI-685603.
2 THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER,
KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,
KUMILY, K S R T C BUS STATION,
KUMILY, IDUKKI-685509.
OTHER PRESENT:
0
SRI.V.K.SUNIL, SR.GP,
SRI.DEEPU THANKAN, SC(KSRTC)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 21.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.33675/2022
2
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
--------------------------------
W.P.(C).No.33675 of 2022
----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 21st day of October, 2022
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the 1st respondent to grant temporary permit to the petitioner on the modified route Changanassery - Kumily in respect of stage carriage KL-33/K 8242 by considering Exhibit.P4 application, forthwith, in the interest of justice.
ii. To issue any other appropriate writ, direction or order which this Honourable Court deem fit in the circumstances of the case.
(SIC)
2. Petitioner is the holder of a regular permit to
operate service on the route Changanassery - Kattappana.
Since the route distance is 146 kms, the renewal application is
pending. In order to limit the route distance within 140 kms,
the petitioner submitted application for variation of permit by
curtailing the route as Changanassery - Kumily. Ext.P2 is the WP(C).No.33675/2022
application submitted for variation. In the meanwhile the
petitioner submitted Ext.P4 application for temporary permit
for continuing the service on the curtailed route. The
grievance of the petitioner is that Ext.P4 is not considered.
Hence this writ petition.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
the learned Government Pleader. I also heard the learned
Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent.
4. After hearing both sides, I think this writ petition
itself can be disposed of directing the 1 st respondent to
consider Ext.P4 within two weeks.
Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of in the
following manner:
1. The 1st respondent is directed to
consider and pass appropriate orders in
Ext.P4 application for temporary permit
on the modified route Changanassery -
Kumily in respect of stage carriage
bearing registration No.KL-33/K-8242,
after affording an opportunity of
hearing to the petitioner and the 2nd WP(C).No.33675/2022
respondent, as expeditiously as
possible, at any rate, within two weeks
from the date of receipt of a copy of this
judgment.
sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
JV JUDGE
WP(C).No.33675/2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 33675/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE VARIATION APPLICATION
DATED 27.9.2022.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT
VALID TILL 3.10.2022.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED
BY THE PETITIONER ON THE CURTAILED ROUTE DATED 27.9.2022.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!