Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abraham vs District Geologist
2022 Latest Caselaw 10354 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10354 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 October, 2022

Kerala High Court
Abraham vs District Geologist on 7 October, 2022
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
  FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 15TH ASWINA, 1944
                    WP(C) NO. 31722 OF 2022
PETITIONER

            ABRAHAM
            AGED 69 YEARS
            S/O.SAMUEL, PLAKOOTTATHIL
            NOW RESIDING AT SAJAN HOUSE, THUMBON NORTH,
            PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 532.

            BY ADVS.
            R.SUNIL KUMAR
            A.SALINI LAL
            ARUN KRISHNA

RESPONDENT


            DISTRICT GEOLOGIST
            DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGY,
            MINI CIVIL STATION, ARANMULA,
            PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 532.




            SMT.DEEPA NARAYANAN SR.GP


     THIS    WRIT   PETITION    (CIVIL)     HAVING    COME    UP    FOR
ADMISSION    ON   07.10.2022,    THE     COURT   ON   THE    SAME   DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 W.P(C) No. 31722 of 2022        2
]

                           JUDGMENT

Dated this the 7th day of October, 2022

The petitioner, who is owner of 12.80 Ares of property in

Re-survey Nos.266/4 and 266/20 in Mezhuveli Village of

Kozhencherry Taluk, has filed this writ petition seeking to direct

the respondent to issue Mineral Transit Pass to the petitioner.

2. The petitioner is owner of 12.802 Ares of property.

The petitioner desires to construct a building in the property.

The petitioner therefore approached the Local Self Government

Institution and has obtained a Building Permit.

3. Construction of the building requires levelling of land

and removal of ordinary earth. The petitioner therefore

submitted Ext.P1 application to the respondent-Geologist

seeking to issue Mineral Transit Pass to the petitioner for

transportation of ordinary earth.

4. Though the application for Mineral Transit Pass was

submitted on 08.06.2022, the respondent has not considered

the same. Unless the respondent considers the application

] expeditiously and issues Mineral Transit Pass at the earliest,

the petitioner will be put to untold hardship and financial loss,

contends the petitioner.

5. The Senior Government Pleader entered appearance

on behalf of the respondent and defended the writ petition. The

Senior Government Pleader controverted all material

allegations made by the petitioner, in the writ petition.

6. On behalf of the respondent, it is submitted that a

large number of applications for Mineral Transit Passes are

pending consideration before the respondent. Issuance of

Mineral Transit Passes would require due verification of the

credibility of application and may involve Site Visits also.

Considering the work load in the office of the respondent, at

least three months time is required to take a decision on such

applications.

7. The Senior Government Pleader submitted that

application for Mineral Transit Pass being a statutory

application, if the petitioner has submitted application supported

] by all requisite documents, the same can be considered in

accordance with law.

8. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Senior Government Pleader representing the

respondent.

9. The petitioner wants to construct a building in his

property and has obtained a Building Permit. Construction of

the building would require levelling of land and removal and

transportation of ordinary earth. The petitioner therefore

requires Mineral Transit Pass and has submitted an application

for the same.

10. Rule 26(4) of the Kerala Minerals (Prevention of

Illegal Mining, Storage and Transportation) Rules, 2015

declares that any consignment of minerals without a valid

Transit Pass shall be considered as illicit and the competent

authority and authorised officer may recover the mineral from

the person and also seize the receptacles in which the same is

found and the carrier used in carrying the same.

]

11. The application submitted by the petitioner for

Mineral Transit Pass therefore is a statutory requirement. The

competent authority therefore is bound to consider the

application in accordance with law within a reasonable time.

The writ petition is therefore disposed of directing the

respondent to consider Ext.P1 application filed by the petitioner

and take appropriate decision thereon in accordance with law,

as expeditiously as possible and at any rate, within a period of

one month.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH, JUDGE

smm/12.10.2022

]

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 31722/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 COPY OF THE APPLICATION BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 8/6/22.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter