Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Afsal vs State Of Kerala
2022 Latest Caselaw 5060 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5060 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2022

Kerala High Court
Afsal vs State Of Kerala on 6 May, 2022
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                   PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
       FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 16TH VAISAKHA, 1944
                       BAIL APPL. NO. 3465 OF 2022
 CRIME NO.197/2022 OF Thadiyittaparamba Police Station, Ernakulam


PETITIONER:

            AFSAL
            AGED 48 YEARS
            SON OF ABDUL RAHMAN, KUTTIKATTIL HOUSE,
            KAIPOORIKARA, VAZHAKULAM VILLAGE,
            PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686670
            BY ADVS.
            K.R.PRATHISH
            S.UNNIKRISHNAN (NELLAD)


RESPONDENT:

            STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
            SMT.SREEJA V, SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR


     THIS     BAIL   APPLICATION   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
06.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 BAIL APPL. NO. 3465 OF 2022

                                    2


                   P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
                   --------------------------------
                     B.A. No.3465 of 2022
                    -------------------------------
              Dated this the 6th day of May, 2022


                               ORDER

This Bail Application is filed under Section 439 of

Criminal Procedure Code.

2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.197 of 2022 of

the Thadiyittaparambu Police Station. The above case is

registered against the petitioner alleging offences

punishable under Section 77 of the Juvenile Justice (Care

and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, Section 118 (i) of

Kerala Police Act and Section 6(a), 6(b), 24 of the Cigarette

and Other Tobacco Products Prevention Act, 2003. The

petitioner is in custody from 16.03.2022.

3. The prosecution case is that on 16.03.2022 at 6.50

pm, the accused was found selling prohibited tobacco

product namely 'Hans' from his shop situated near

Hidayatul Muslimeen Madrassa, Kaipoorikara, to a minor BAIL APPL. NO. 3465 OF 2022

child aged about 12 years and also found keeping in his

possession 2414 packets of 'Hans' in the autorickshaw

bearing registration No.KL-07-CG-9886 and a car bearing

registration No.KL-40-P-9097, which were parked near his

shop. Hence it is alleged that the accused committed

offence.

4. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Public

Prosecutor. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that

the petitioner is in custody from 16.03.2022 onwards. The

counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is

falsely implicated in this case. The counsel for the

petitioner submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide

any conditions if this Court grant him bail. The Public

Prosecutor seriously opposed the bail application. The

Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is involved

in other cases also. The Public Prosecutor also submitted

that the petitioner may not be released on bail at this

stage. It is true that the allegations against the petitioner BAIL APPL. NO. 3465 OF 2022

are very serious. But the petitioner is in custody from

16.03.2022 onwards. The apprehension of the prosecution

is that if the petitioner is released on bail, he will commit

similar offences. If any case is registered against the

petitioner subsequent to this order, the prosecution is free

to file an application before the jurisdictional Court to

cancel this bail and the jurisdictional Court will pass

appropriate orders in it, even though the bail order is

passed by this Court. There can be a direction to the

petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer on all

Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays till final report is filed.

During the bail period, if there is any criminal activity on

the part of the petitioner, I once again make it clear that

the Investigating Officer is free to file an application for

cancellation of the bail. With the above conditions, this bail

application can be allowed.

5. Moreover, it is a well accepted principle that the

bail is the rule and the jail is the exception. The Hon'ble BAIL APPL. NO. 3465 OF 2022

Supreme Court in Chidambaram. P v Directorate of

Enforcement (2019 (16) SCALE 870), after considering

all the earlier judgments, observed that, the basic

jurisprudence relating to bail remains the same in as much

as the grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the exception

so as to ensure that the accused has the opportunity of

securing fair trial.

6. Considering the dictum laid down in the above

decision and considering the facts and circumstances of

this case, this Bail Application is allowed with the following

directions:

1. Petitioner shall be released on bail

on executing a bond for Rs.50,000/-

(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two

solvent sureties each for the like sum to

the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court.

2. The petitioner shall appear before

the Investigating Officer for interrogation BAIL APPL. NO. 3465 OF 2022

as and when required. The petitioner shall

co-operate with the investigation and shall

not, directly or indirectly make any

inducement, threat or promise to any

person acquainted with the facts of the

case so as to dissuade him/her from

disclosing such facts to the Court or to any

police officer.

3. Petitioner shall not leave India

without permission of the jurisdictional

Court.

4. Petitioner shall not commit an

offence similar to the offence of which he is

accused, or suspected, of the commission

of which he is suspected.

5. The petitioner shall appear before

the Investigating Officer on all Mondays,

Wednesdays and Fridays at 10 am till final BAIL APPL. NO. 3465 OF 2022

report is filed.

6. If any of the above conditions are

violated by the petitioner, the jurisdictional

Court can cancel the bail in accordance to

law, even though the bail is granted by this

Court.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE

np BAIL APPL. NO. 3465 OF 2022

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 3465/2022

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19.03.2022 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, KAKKANAD IN C.M.P NO. 638 OF 2022 IN CRIME NO. 197 OF 2022 OF THADIYITTAPARAMBU POLICE STATION Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE E COURT STATUS OF THE PROCEEDINGS IN CRL MC NO.722 OF 2022 OF DISTRICT &SESSIONS COURT ERNAKULAM DATED 29.03.2022 Annexure A3 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 08.04.2022 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT ERNAKULAM (FOR THE CASES RELATING TO ATROCITIES & SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN) IN C.M.P NO.224 OF 2022 Annexure A4 CERTIFIED ORDER DATED 27.04.2022 OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE IN C.M.P NO. 252 OF 2022 IN CRIME NO. 197 OF 2022 OF THADIYITTAPARAMBU POLICE STATION Annexure A5 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITIONER IDENTITY CARD FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter