Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajesh Babu vs Chairman And Managing Director
2022 Latest Caselaw 5016 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5016 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 May, 2022

Kerala High Court
Rajesh Babu vs Chairman And Managing Director on 4 May, 2022
WA No.514/2022                               1/3

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                         PRESENT
                      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
                                            &
                        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
                 Wednesday, the 4th day of May 2022 / 14th Vaisakha, 1944
                                    WA NO. 514 OF 2022

         AGAINST JUDGMENT DATED 13.04.2022 IN WP(C) 8370/2022 OF THIS COURT

                                          ---

   APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS:

      1. RAJESH BABU,AGED 45 YEARS,S/O. M.V.BABU, KARTHIKA, KOTTAPURAM,
         KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM-695 531, PROPRIETOR, UNIVERSAL TELE SERVICES,
         ST. GEORGE BUILDING, PULAMON P.O, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM 691 531.
      2. K.C. JOSEPH, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O.K.K.CHACKO, CHOOLAYI (H),
         AVALOOKUNNU P.O., PUNNAMADA, ALLEPPEY-688 006, PROPRIETOR, MEGA
         TRADING CORPORATION, CHOOLAYIL TOWERS, THATHAMPALLY P.O, FINISHING
         POINT, ALAPPUZHA 688 013.
      3. G. MANOJ KUMAR, AGED 40 YEARS,S/O. GOPALAKRISHNA MADHU NIVAS,
         THATHAMPALLY P.O., ALLEPPEY-688 013, PROPRIETOR, DREAM
         COMMUNICATIONS, MUNICIPAL COMPLEX, VEDIMARA JUNCTION, NORTH PARAVUR,
         ERNAKULAM 683 520.
      4. S. ANIL KUMAR,AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.SIVARAMA PILLAI, ESWARY NILAYAM,
         PUNNAMOODU, VARKALA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 0141, PROPRIETOR,
         AS COMMUNICATIONS, EASWARI NILAYAM, PUNNAMOODU, VARKALA,
         TRIVANDRUM-695 141.BY ADV.SRI.SREEKUMAR G.CHELUR AND
         ADV.SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN IYER

   RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 6/3RD PETITIONER:

      1. CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD., 702,
         BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD., 702, BHARAT SANCHAR BHAWAN, BSNL C.O,
         JANPATH, NEW DELHI 110 001.
      2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD., O/O. OF THE
         CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, BSNL, KERALA CIRCLE, DOOR SANCHAR BHAWAN, PMG
         JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033
      3. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (S&M-CM), BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.,
         O/O. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, BSNL, KERALA CIRCLE, DOOR SANCHAR
         BHAWAN, PMG JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033
      4. THE GENERAL MANAGER, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD., O/O. THE GENERAL
         MANAGER TELECOM, ERNAKULAM 682 016.
      5. THE GENERAL MANAGER, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD., O/O. THE GENERAL
         MANAGER TELECOM, PATHANAMTHITTA 689 101.
      6. THE GENERAL MANAGER, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD., O/O. THE GENERAL
         MANAGER TELECOM, KOLLAM-691 001
      7. SEBASTIAN THOMAS, PROPRIETOR, ANUPAM FOODS, KALLEL COMPLEX,
         THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI 685 584.BY SENIOR ADVOCATE SRI.K.RAM KUMAR AND
         STANDING COUNSEL SRI.T.RAMAPRASAD UNNI
 WA No.514/2022                            2/3

                Prayer for interim relief in the Writ Appeal stating that in
          the circumstances stated in the appeal memorandum, the High Court be
          pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to Exts.P2 to P5
          and dierct the respondents not to proceed further with Exts.P2,P3,P4
          and EOI's issued incorporating S.2B(g) and not to issue any fresh
          EOI incorporating S.2B (g), pending disposal of the writ appeal, in
          the interst of justice.


                 This Writ Appeal coming on for admission on 04.05.2022 upon
          perusing the appeal memorandum, the court on the same day passed the
          following:


                                         ORDER

We have heard Sri.Sreekumar Chelur, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and we are of the view that this appeal deserves to be admitted. It is so ordered.

Sri.K.Ram Kumar, learned Senior Counsel, instructed by Sri.T.Ramaprasad Unni, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, argued that an interim order, can be issued in this case only taking note of the dictum declared by this court in Pushkarraj Constructions Pvt.Ltd and others V. Silppi Constructions and Contractors (2019(3) KHC 566), adding that none of the tenderers are on record.

We do not propose to enter into this issue at this stage and leave it to be decided at the time when it is finally decided.

Resultantly, all action pursuant to the impugned judgment will remain bound by the final decision to be arrived by this court.

List after a month.

          04/05/2022                        Sd/-DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN,JUDGE

                                            Sd/-P.G.AJITHKUMAR,JUDGE
 WA No.514/2022                               3/3




EXT.P2:TRUE COPY OF THE EXPRESSION OF INTEREST (EOI) FOR ERNAKULAM BA EOI NO.KRLCO-15/13 (12)/8/2020-S AND M-CM DATED 22.02.2022. EXT.P3:TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE EXPRESSION OF INTEREST (EOI) FOR PATHANAMTHITTA BA EOI NO.KRLCO-15/13 (12)/7/2020-S AND M- CM PARRT (1) DATED 22.02.2022.

EXT.P4:TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE EXPRESSION OF INTEREST (EOI) FOR KOLLAM BA-EOI NO.KRLCO-15/13(12)/3/2020-S AND M-CM DATED 23.02.2022.

EXT.P5:TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 25.02.2022 ADDRESSED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

04-05-2022 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter