Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shahul Midad vs The State Of Kerala
2022 Latest Caselaw 4937 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4937 Ker
Judgement Date : 4 May, 2022

Kerala High Court
Shahul Midad vs The State Of Kerala on 4 May, 2022
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                 PRESENT
             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
     WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 14TH VAISAKHA, 1944
                     BAIL APPL. NO. 3102 OF 2022
        CRIME NO.830/2021 OF PATTAMBI POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CMP 1784/2022 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
                      OF FIRST CLASS , PATTAMBI


PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.5:

            SHAHUL MIDAD,
            AGED 30 YEARS
            S/O.HAMZA,
            MALAYIL HOUSE,
            NELLAYA P.O.
            POTTACHIRA,
            PALAKKAD DISTRICT,
            PIN - 679336
            BY ADVS.
            HARIKRISHNAN S.
            P.PRIJITH
            AJAY BEN JOSE
            MANJUNATH MENON
            P.MARTIN JOSE
            SACHIN JACOB AMBAT
            R.GITHESH
            ANNA LINDA V.J
            S.SREEKUMAR (SR.)
            THOMAS P.KURUVILLA


RESPONDENTS:

    1       THE STATE OF KERALA,
            REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
            HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
            ERNAKULAM,
            KOCHI- 682031.
    2       THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
 BAIL APPL.NO.3102 OF 2022

                            2

         PATTAMBI POLICE STATION,
         PATTAMBI,
         PALAKKAD DISTRICT
         PIN - 691303


         BY ADV.SMT.NEEMA T.V, SENIOR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

     THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 04.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 BAIL APPL.NO.3102 OF 2022

                            3



               P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
            --------------------------------
                 B.A.No.3102 of 2022
             -------------------------------
          Dated this the 4th day of May, 2022


                          ORDER

This Bail Application is filed under Section 439 of

Criminal Procedure Code.

2. Petitioner is the 5th accused in Crime No.830

of 2021 of Pattambi Police Station. The above case is

registered against the petitioner and others alleging

offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148,

324, 326 and 307 r/w 149 of the IPC. Petitioner was

arrested on 10.04.2022 and from that date onwards

he is in custody.

3. The prosecution case is that on 28.12.2021,

the petitioner and the other accused formed

themselves into an unlawful assembly armed with

weapons attacked the defacto complainant. BAIL APPL.NO.3102 OF 2022

4. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the

Public Prosecutor. The counsel for the petitioner

submitted that the petitioner has not committed any

offence. The counsel also submitted that the name

of the petitioner is also not mentioned in the FIR.

The counsel again submitted that the allegation

against the petitioner is that he used iron rods and

beat the defacto complainant in his legs. There is

absolutely no injury on legs. The counsel also

submitted that the main allegation is against the

other accused. The petitioner is the 5th accused.

The learned Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the

bail application. The Public Prosecutor submitted

that the offence alleged against the petitioner

includes Section 326 and 307. The Public Prosecutor

submitted that the investigation is at the preliminary

stage. It is true that the allegation against the

petitioner is very serious. But the petitioner is in BAIL APPL.NO.3102 OF 2022

custody from 10.04.2022. It is true that the name

of the petitioner is not mentioned in the FIR. That is

not a reason to grant bail to the petitioner because

that is a matter to be decided by the trial court at

the appropriate stage. Similarly the counsel for the

petitioner also submitted that there is contradiction

in the ocular evidence and medical evidence. That is

also a matter to be decided by the trial court at the

appropriate stage. The Public Prosecutor submitted

that the petitioner is involved in four other crimes

also. It is true that the petitioner is involved in other

cases, but that is not a ground to reject the bail in

the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in

Maulana Mohd. Amir Rashadi v. State Of U.P.

and others [2012(2)SCC 382]. But considering the

entire facts and circumstances of the case and also

the period of detention, I think this bail application

can be allowed.

BAIL APPL.NO.3102 OF 2022

5. Moreover, it is a well accepted principle that

the bail is the rule and the jail is the exception. The

Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chidambaram. P v

Directorate of Enforcement (2019 (16) SCALE

870), after considering all the earlier judgments,

observed that, the basic jurisprudence relating to

bail remains the same inasmuch as the grant of bail

is the rule and refusal is the exception so as to

ensure that the accused has the opportunity of

securing fair trial.

6. Considering the dictum laid down in the

above decision and considering the facts and

circumstances of this case, this Bail Application is

allowed with the following directions:

1. Petitioner shall be released

on bail on executing a bond for

Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand

only) with two solvent sureties each BAIL APPL.NO.3102 OF 2022

for the like sum to the satisfaction of

the jurisdictional Court.

2. The petitioner shall appear

before the Investigating Officer for

interrogation as and when required.

The petitioner shall co-operate with

the investigation and shall not,

directly or indirectly make any

inducement, threat or promise to

any person acquainted with the facts

of the case so as to dissuade

him/her from disclosing such facts to

the Court or to any police officer.

3. Petitioner shall not leave India

without permission of the

jurisdictional Court.

4. Petitioner shall not commit an

offence similar to the offence of BAIL APPL.NO.3102 OF 2022

which he is accused, or suspected, of

the commission of which he is

suspected.

5. If any of the above conditions

are violated by the petitioner, the

jurisdictional Court can cancel the

bail in accordance to law, even

though the bail is granted by this

Court. The prosecution and the

victim are at liberty to approach the

jurisdictional court to cancel the bail,

if there is any violation of the above

conditions.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE DM BAIL APPL.NO.3102 OF 2022

APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 3102/2022

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES ANNEXURE1 TRUE COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO.830 OF 2021 OF PATTAMBI POLICE STATION ANNEXURE 2 TRUE COPY OF FIS IN CRIME NO.830 OF 2021 OF PATTAMBI POLICE STATION ANNEXURE 3 TRUE DRAFT COPY OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY OF DEFACTO COMPLAINANT ANNEXURE 4 TRUE DRAFT COPY OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY OF MR.ANEESH ANNEXURE 5 TRUE COPY OF REMAND REPORT IN CRIME NO.830 OF 2021 OF PATTAMBI POLICE STATION ANNEXURE 6 TRUE COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO.619 OF 2021 OF PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION ANNEXURE 7 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER DATED 12-04-

2022 IN C.M.P.NO.1784 OF 2022 IN CRIME NO.830 OF 2021 PASSED BY JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, PATTAMBI

//TRUE COPY//

PA TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter