Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3233 Ker
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 8760 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
U.K. MOHANAN, AGED 62 YEARS, S/O ULAKAN KUNJAN,
RESIDING AT KONKERIL HOUSE, THEKKEMURIYIL KARAYIL,
VADAKKEMURI VILLAGE, UDAYANPURAM P.O, PIN-686143.
BY ADVS.
P.HARIDAS
SRI.BIJU HARIHARAN
SRI.P.C.SHIJIN
SRI.RISHIKESH HARIDAS
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.
2 TAHSILDAR, KOTTAYAM, (LAND TRIBUNAL VAIKOM),
TALUK OFFICE, KOTTAYAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,
PIN-686001.
3 APPELLATE AUTHORITY (L.R), REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRESIDING OFFICER OFFICE OF THE APPELLALATE
AUTHORITY (L.R), NEW BAZAR, ALAPPUZHA, PIN-688001.
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VADAKKEMURI VILLAGE OFFICE,
UDAYANAPURAM P.O., VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT,
PIN-686143.
5 ADDL. R5. VARKEY JOSEPH, PULIPRA HOUSE,
THEKKEMURIYIL KARAYIL, VADAKKEMURI VILLAGE,
UDAYANAPURAM P.O., PIN-686143.
6 ADDL. R6. VAVA, PULPRATHAZHAM HOUSE,
THEKKEMURIYIL KARAYIL, VADAKKEMURI VILLAGE,
UDAYANAPURAM P.O., PIN-686143.
(ADDITIONAL R5 AND R6 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED
13/04/2021 IN IA 2/21 IN WPC NO.8760/2021)
SMT.MABLE C KURIAN - SR.G.P
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
18.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WPC 8760/21
2
JUDGMENT
Though various averments, assertions and allegations have
been urged and made in this Writ Petition, the learned counsel
for the petitioner - Sri.P.Haridas, conceded that unless the 3 rd
respondent - Appellate Authority disposes of Ext.P7 Statutory
Appeal preferred by his client within a time frame, no other
reliefs can be granted, especially because his client seeks that
he be permitted to remit Land Tax on the property in question.
2. The learned Senior Government Pleader - Smt.Mable
C. Kurian, submitted that if Ext.P7 is still pending before the
Appellate Authority, the same can be disposed of as per law;
however, praying that this Court may not make any affirmative
declarations on the entitlement of the petitioner to any relief
and leave it to the competent Authority to take a final decision
as per law.
3. The files show that notices issued to respondents 5
and 6 have been returned with the endorsement 'not known'.
However, in view of the limited directions that I propose WPC 8760/21
herein, am of the view that no prejudice will be caused to them
even if this Writ Petition is disposed of in their absence.
Resultantly, I order this Writ Petition and direct the 3 rd
respondent - Appellate Authority to take up Ext.P7 Statutory
Appeal - if it is still pending - and dispose it of, after
affording the petitioner and all other necessary persons an
opportunity of being heard; thus culminating in an appropriate
order and necessary action thereon as expeditiously as is
possible, but not later than six months from the date of receipt
of a copy of this judgment.
Needless to say, after the afore exercise is completed and
the resultant order received by the petitioner, he will be at
liberty to approach the 4th respondent - Village Officer, who
will then accede - subject to his entitlement having been
established - to his request for remittance of Land Tax over the
property in question, without any avoidable delay thereafter.
Sd/-
RR DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
WPC 8760/21
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 8760/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN O.A.5647/70
OF LAND TRIBUNAL, VAIKOM.
EXHIBIT P1(A) TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
PURCHASE OF KUDIKIDAPPU NO.1105 IN O.A.5647/70 OF LAND TRIBUNAL, VAIKOM DATED 30.05.1970.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION B2.371/2020 ISSUED FROM THE 3RD RESPONDENT AUTHORITY TO THE PETITIONER DATED 3.12.2020.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.
5737/1974 OF SRO, VAIKOM DATED 27/12/1974.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO 1641/1997 OF SRO, VAIKOM DATED 26.05.1997.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.
1902/2000 OF SRO, VAIKOM DATED 27/06/2000.
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE THE LOCATION SKETCH OF THE 20 CENTS PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER WHICH IS SITUATED NEAR TO 10 CENTS OF KUDIKIDAPPU ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VADAKKEMURI TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 102 RESPECTED WITH SECTION 57/(2) OF THE KERALA LAND REFORMS ACT, 1963 WITH PETITION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY WITHOUT THE ANNEXURES THEREIN DATED 02.02.2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!