Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Divya Rajan vs Bineesh P.B
2022 Latest Caselaw 3030 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3030 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 March, 2022

Kerala High Court
Divya Rajan vs Bineesh P.B on 17 March, 2022
                  IN THE HIGH COURT 0F KERALA AT ERl\IAKULAM

                                        PRESENT

               THE HONOURABLE MR.        JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

                                           &

                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.          JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS

     THURSDAY,        "E 17TH DAY 01= MARCH 2022 / 26TH PHALGUNA,       1943

                                0P /FCI NO. 492 0F: 2021
      AeAINST THE ORDER/]uDGMENT IN Op Gw 206®/2®2® OF I:AMILy

                                    COURT, ERNAKU LAM

PETITIONER :

               DIVYA RAJAN, AGED 35 YEARS, W/0. BINEESH P.B., THUMPA
               VILAYIL HOUSE, AKDUVINAL P.0., VALLIKUNNAM MURI,
               VALLIKUNNAM VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING
               AT AMBADIYIL HOUSE, PAVUMPA P.0. , KARUNAGAPALLY TALUK,
               KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN-690 574.

               BY ADVS.
               P . HARI DAS
               P . C . SHIJIN
               RISHIKESH HARIDAS
               BIJU HARIHARAN


RESPONDENTS :

BINEESH P.B. AGED 39 YEARS, S/0, BABY, RESIDING AT PISHARIKATTIL HOUSE, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, P00THOTTA P.0., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682 307 (NOW RESIDING IN KUWAIT) .

BABY, AGED 66 YEARS, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN T0 THE PETITIONER, RESIDING AT PISHARIKATTIL HOUSE, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, P00THOTTA P.0., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682

NIRMALA, AGED 60 YEARS, W/0. BABY, RESIDING AT PISHARIKATTIL HOUSE, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, P00THOTTA P.0., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682 307.

BINU, AGED 37 YEARS, S/0. BABU, RESIDING AT PISHARIKATTIL HOUSE., MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, P00THOTTA P.0., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682 307.

BABY DAKSHINA, AGED 6 YEARS, D/0. BINEESH P.B AND DIWA RAJAN, RESIDING AT PISHARIKATTIL HOUSE, MANAKUNNAM OP ffi NO. 492 0F 2oZI Z

VILLAGE, P00THOTTA P,O. , ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682

307. ( NOW UNDER THE CUSTODY 0F RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4) .

DEKSHITH, AGED 4 YEARS, S/0. BINEESH P.B. AND DIVYA RAJAN, RESIDING AT PISHARIKATTIL HOUSE, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, P00THOTTA P.0., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682

307. . (NOW UNDER THE CUSTODY 0F RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4),

ADDL. THE COMMISSIONER 0F POLICE KOCHI, OFFICE 0F THE COMMISSIONER 0F POLICE, ABDUL KALAM MARG, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682011

ADDL. R7 IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 22/12/21 IN IA 1/2021 IN 0P(FC) 492/2021

ADDL. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, UDAYAMPER00R POLICE STATION, SH-15, UDAYAMPER00R, KANDANAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN- 682307 '

ADDL. R8 IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 22/12/21 IN IA 1/2021 IN 0P(FC) 492/2021

ADDL R9. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER, REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER, TRIVANDRUM, REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE, SNSM BUILDING, 3,4TH FLOOR, KAITHAMUKKU PETTA RD., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA 695024.

ADDL. R9 IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 22/12/21 IN IA 4/2021 IN 0P(FC) 492/2021.

10 THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, PASSPORT SEVA KENDRAN, KOLLAM PASSPORT SEVA KENDRAM, KOLLAM 74 BUILDING # MC VIII/1578/715 ASN TRUST COMPLEX, NEAR KOLLAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFFICE, VELLAPPALLY NAGAR, KOLLAM, KERALA 691320 I

ADDL. R10 IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDER DATED 22/12/21 IN IA 4/2021 IN 0P(FC) 492/2021

BY ADVS.

               T.U,SUJITH KUMAR
               SRI.SUVIN R.MENON,       CGC




       THIS    0P        (FAMILY   COURT)     HAVING   BEEN   FINALLY   HEARD    0N

17.03.2022, THE COURT 0N THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP qp NO. 492 0F 2021

UDGMENT

A. Arfulhamed Musfaque. I

This original petition was filed cliallenging art order

relating to custody. The petitioner-mother and the lst

respondent-father are nor residents of India and currently

employed in Kuwait. The marital diaputes between them are

pending before the family Court, chavara and the Falnily Court,

Ernakulan. The parfes resolved their disprfes and filed a joint

petition for divorce involdrig Section 1 3 8 of the Hinds Marriage

Act, 1955. The parties also have entered into ari agreement

regarding custody of the children born in their wedlock There

are disputes regarding the mainteriarice. In regard to the

quariftm of maintenance payable to the children I;y the lst

respondent-father, the parties have agreed for resolution of the

disputes.

2. The petitioner appeared though online. She has been

identified by the learried coimsel appearing for her. The lst

respondent-father is present before this Court. We interacted OP qp NO. 492 0F 20Z1

with both parties. They are firm in their decision to dissolve

their marriage. The divorce petitions filed by the petitioner

before the Family Cotut, Chavara and by the lst respondent-

father before the Family Court, Ernakulam are pending. We are

of the view that the statutory cooling off period can be waived

` since the parties are living separately for the last more than

several years and the petitioner-wife filed the divorce petition in

the year 2019.

3. We are also of the view that the marriage can be

dissolved based on the mutual consent of the parties. In regard

to the custody of the children, the petitioner-mother is appointed

as a natural guardiari and permanent custodian of the children

namely, Dakshina and Dekshith. It is agreed before this Court by

both parties that the children will be taken to kuwait by the

petitioner-mother, the natural guardian and permarient

custodian. The lst respondent-father will have the custody of the

children on every Friday between 10 am and 5 pin. He is also

permitted to contact the children whenever he wishes through Op qp NO. 492 Or 2Ozi

video platform or over phone.

4. The children are now at the parental house of the lst

respondent. If the children are taken to Kuwait, the lst

respondent-father shall pay a sum of Rs.5000/-(Rupees Fife

Thousand only) each to the children as maintenance. However,

if the children remains in India, the lot respondent-father is

bourid to take care of the children. We record the terms arid

conditions agreed by the parties in the 1 3 8 application and that

will form part of the judgment. In the light of settlement above,

we dispose of this original petition with the following orders:

I. We direct Family Court, Chavara to record the

dissolution of marriage betveen the petitioner and the lst

respondent by mutual consent without insisting further

appearance of the parties in O.P (Div) No.500 of 2019 within a

period of two weeks.

11. O.P (G&W) No.2060 of 2020 before the Family court,

Emakulam shall be disposed of recording the settlement of the

parties before this Court in regard to custody of the children. OP ffl NO. 49z or 2021

Ill. We also direct the Family Court, Emakulam to 'close

O.P (G&W) No.1604 of 2021 in the light of settlement arrived at

between the parties before this Court.

IV. The petitioner is permitted to process the VISA as a

sole guardian of the children and the petitioner alone will be

responsible for taking the children to Kuwait.

V. The entire records including school records, Aadhaar

cards etc., shall be handed over by the respondents to the

petitioner-mother at the time in which the children are taken to

Kuwait.

AMUIIAArmMUsmQIJE

JuREE

Sd/-

sour"ous JumE PR OP ffl NO. 492 or 2ozi

APPENDIX 0F 0P (Fcl 492/2021

PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY 0F THE 0,P.(G&W) NO.2®60/2020 BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM, ORIGINALLY FILED BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY 0F THE I.A.NO.4519 0F 2021 IN 0,P(G&W) NO.2060/2020 0F FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 5.10.2021.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY 0F TRANSCRIBED COPY 0F THE ORDER IN IA NO,4518/2021 IN 0.P.(G&W) NO.2060/2020 0F FAMILY COURT ERNAKULAM DATED 6.10.2021.

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY 0F THE POWER 0F ATTORNEY DATED

21. 06 , 2019 .

                                uwlul,                                                       lJir,. -Z
 poe+ Gy`:        i>.cb3.2c>T2_2            \n louzf+.j^JO.?a
        \ t> `o3 . fo2 2_

RE THE HONORABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT EENAIUI,AM I.A.No. j of 2022

o.p.(F.c.) Nor.¥92of 2o21 A

Divya Rajan & Other : Applicants/ Petitioner& 1st responclenl-

Vs.

Bineesh.P.B & others : Respondents/Re`spondent 2-9

APPLICATH®N FILEH) UNDER SE}CTION 13 a OF THB RIHNDU MARREAGE ACT 1955 cF±{)a(-pz}y btl Wi)`j Yto+\\b| uJvul I+|Ldr3ulq*apLl •,c`i ?., `,`

``.,

. (:t,i

- I . .3 . ` ( `,,

`- ,`~'

\

p`uAe`Das(u'2`)`\\:``t``;:\` ¢ './,

i. U . Su3i\hkuw`ay ij'=---i:--i-:-`i--:-:---

AJdvcptaA^`j'

•NN"e`fenwhhop);(ul3/pchiflancfdlrJ-4!pendn\ BEFORE THE H©N®RABELE HIGH COURT 0F KERAELA AT:

ERRI%ULAM I.A.No. ®f 2022

0.P.(F.C.) N©.492 of 2021

APPELHCANTS PETHTHONER & 1ST RBSPONDENT:

1, Divya Rajan, aged 35 years, W/o Bincesh.P.B, Thumpa Vilayil House, Kaduvinal.P.O, Vallikunnam Muri, Vallikunnam Village, Alappuzha District, Now residing at Ambadiyil liouse, Pavumpa.P.O, Karuiiagapally Taluk, Kollam District, Pin: 690574 represented by Iler mother- and power of attorTiey holcler Sumangala Devarajan, aged 57 years, W/o Devai-ajan, resiclent of Sheeja Bhavanam, Maiia|)pally North.P.O, Kari]nagappally, Kollam District, Pin: 690574, now rest.ding at Ambadi.vi House, Pavumba.P.O, Manappally, Karunagappally, Kollam District, Pin: 690574.

2, J3ineesh.P.B, aged 39 years, S/o Baby, residing at Pisharikattil House,Manakunnam Vil]agc, Poothotta.P.O, Ei-nakulam District, Pin: 682307. (Whatsapp No: 0096567798520,email:baii`'\/'.1~jiiiceshL'J\i;niail.{``om)

\_.

omdemts ®ndents 2 to 10:-

1. Baby, aged about 66 years, father's name not known to the petitioner, residing at Pisliarikattil House, Ma_nakunnam Village, Poothotta.P.O, Eiiiakulam District, Pin: 682307. ( Whats app No: 9947947846)

2. Nirmala, aged about 60 years, W/o 13aby, residing at Pisharikattil House, Manakunnam Village, Poothotta.P.O, Emakulam District, Pin: 682307. ( Whats app No: 9947947846)

3.Binu, aged about 37 years, S/o Baby, residing at Pisharikattil House, Manakunnam Village, Poothotta.P.O,

~.S_` Ernakulam District, Pin: 682307. ( Wh.ats app No:

9947947846, email bl98 mail.com

4. Baby Dakshina, D/o Bineesh.P.B and Divya Rajan, aged 6 years, residing at Pisharikattil House,Manakunnam Village, Poothotta.P.O, `Ernakulam District, Pin: 682307. ( Now under the custody of respondents 2 to 4)

5. Baby Dekshith, S/o Bineesh.P.B and Dii7ya Rajan, aged 4 years, residing at Pisharikattil House,Manakunnam Village, Poothotta.P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin: 682307. ( Now under the custody of respondents` 2 to 4)

6.The Commissioner of Police, Kochi, Office of the Commissioner of Police, .Abdul Kalam Marg, Marine Drive, Emakulam, Pin- 682011.

7. The Station .House Officer, Udayamperoor Police Station, SH-15, Udayamperoor, Kandanad, Ernakulam, Pin- 682307.

8. The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Officer, Trivandrum, Regional Passport Office,. SNSM Building, 3 , 4th Floor, Kaithamukku Petta Rd , Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695024.

9. The authorized officer, Passport Seva Kendram, Kollam 74 Building # MC VIlr / 1578 / 715 A S.N Trust Complex, Near Kollam Municipal Corporation Office, Vellappally Nagar, Kollam, Kerala 691320

APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 13 8 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955

1. It is submitted that applicants are wife and

husband. Marriage between the lst applicant and the 2nd

applicant was solemnised on 10.04.2011 at Anupana

Auditorium, Pavumba. Two children were born in the said

wedlock namely Dakshina on 07.07.2015 and Dekshith on

EE 03.02.2017. Thereafter applicants are living separately

from 13.06.2019 onwards.

2. It is submitted tha.t lst applicant had fli ed OP (Div)

No.500/2019 for divorce and O.P (G&W) No.509/2019 for

appointing hei- as guardian of the children and their

permanent` custody before the Family Court, Cha.vai-a. Due to la.ck of j.urisdiction, O.P(G&W) .No.509/2019 was

ti-ansferred to the Family Court, Ernafulam and r.e-

numbered as O.P.(G&W) No.2060/2020.

3. It is submitted that 2nd applicant filed

O.P.No.1579/2019 befoi-e the Family Court, Ernakulam and

obtained an expczrfe decree of restitution of conjugal rights j=--_ on 27.04.2020. He also-filed O.P.No.1604/2021 before the _.r<

Family Coil.rt, Ernakulam for divo`i:ce.

4. It is submittea``that now the applicants have been

living separately for a period more than one year and that

they ha.ve not been able to live together and tha.t_±Lhey hay_e

mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.

5. It is agi-eed by the applicants that permanent

custody of the children shall be with the lst applicant and

-F she may be appointed as guardian of them. 2nd applicant is

having no objection in taking the children abroad by the lsl

applicant.

6. It also agreed between the applicants that 2ncl applicant shall give monthly maintenance to the children as fixed by this honourable court after hearing both the parties.

7. It is agreed by the parties that they shall have liberty to approach appropriate forum for their proprietary u and monetary claims against each other.

Under such circumstances, this Honourable Court may be pleased to pass an order dissolving the marriage between the applicants solemnised at Anupama Auclitorium, Pavumba on 10.04.2011, in the best interest of justice.

`-.

•,_!iilr;;-S B"lox 2"tl Applicant Suj ithkumar T . U .

Counsel for the 2ntlApplicant/ lst Respt)ndent

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter