Shine P Jacob vs Union Of India
2022 Latest Caselaw 7194 Ker

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
                 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
        THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 2ND ASHADHA, 1944
                        WP(C) NO. 26156 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:

            SHINE P JACOB, AGED 50 YEARS
            S/O. P. M. JACOB, POOVANNUMMOOTTIL HOUSE, T. B.
            JUNCTION, PUNALUR P. O., KOLLAM - 691305.
            BY ADVS.
            ALEXANDER JOSEPH
            AKHILASREE BHASKARAN


RESPONDENT/S:

    1       UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY
            OF FINANCE, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI - 110 001.
    2       THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
            REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, RESERVE BANK OF INDIA,
            16TH FLOOR, CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDING, SHAHID BHAGAT
            SINGH MARG, MUMBAI - 400 001.
    3       THE REGIONAL MANAGER , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, REGIONAL
            OFFICE, BAKERY JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
    4       THE SECRETARY , THE DISASTER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY, NDMA
            BHAWAN, A-1, SAFDARJUNG ENCLAVE, NEW DELHI - 110029.
    5       THE BANKING OMBUDSMAN
            OFFICE OF THE BANKING OMBUDSMAN, RESERVE BANK OF INDIA,
            BAKERY JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033.
    6       THE CHAIRMAN , THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK, TRICHUR - 680 001.
    7       THE REGIONAL MANAGER , REGIONAL OFFICE, SOUTH INDIAN
            BANK, YWCA BUILDING, M. G. ROAD, STATUE,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014.
    8       THE BRANCH MANAGER , THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK,
            PATHANAPURAM BRANCH, PATHANAPURAM - 689695.
    9       THE AUTHORISED OFFICER/CHIEF MANAGER
            THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK, REGIONAL OFFICE, YWCA BUILDING,
            MG ROAD, STATUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695014.
            BY ADVS.
            RAHUL RAJ
            SUNIL SHANKER
            VIDYA GANGADHARAN


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 26156 OF 2021                2



                                  JUDGMENT

When this matter is taken up for consideration, learned

counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition

has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is

dismissed as infructuous.

sd/-

GOPINATH P.

JUDGE ajt

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26156/2021

PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TOKEN ISSUED BY 8TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PAY IN SLIP DATED 08.11.2021 ISSUED BY THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK, TECHNO PARK BRANCH.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 09.11.2021 TO THE 8TH RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 08.11.2021 OF THE 8TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER. Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 18.11.2021 OF THE PETITIONER.

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 16.11.2021 OF THE PETITIONER TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT. Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 09/03/2022 OF THE 8TH RESPONDENT.